[1. The Government of the Republic of Lithuania (2012). Lithuania’s Progress Strategy 2030. Internet access: https://lrv.lt/uploads/main/documents/files/EN_version/Useful_information/lithuania2030.pdf [accessed January 20, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[2. MOSTA (2018). Executive summary of the questionnaire report on reasons of low cooperation levels between scientific and business institutions in Lithuania “Science and Business cooperation on scientific research and experimental activities“ (in Lithuanian only). Internet access: https://mosta.lt/images/documents/atasakaitos/Mokslo%20ir%20verslo%20bendradarbiavimo%20MTEP%20srityje%20tyrimo%20rezultat%C5%B3%20ataskaita_MOSTA_2018.pdf [accessed January 20, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[3. European Commission (2018). The European Union’s Efforts to Simplify Legislation. 2018 Annual Burden survey. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2018-annual-burden-survey_en.pdf [accessed January 28, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[4. European Commission (2016). Better Regulations for Innovation-driven Investment at the EU level. Internet access: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/404b82db-d08b-11e5-a4b5-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-79728021 [accessed January 28, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[5. European Commission (2016). Joint Report on Health Care and Long-Term Care Systems & Fiscal Sustainability. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economy-finance/joint-report-health-care-and-long-term-care-systems-fiscal-sustainability-0_en [accessed January 28, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[6. European Commission (2016). Open innovation book: Open innovation. Open Science. Open to the world-a vision for Europe. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe [accessed January 30, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[7. OECD (2015). Highlight of the OECD Science, Technology and Industry scoreboard 2015. Internet access: http://www.oecd.org/sti/Science-brief-scoreboard.pdf [accessed June 10, 2019].10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2015-en]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Xu, G., Wu, Y., Minshall, T., Zhou, T. (2017). Exploring Innovation Ecosystems across Science, Technology, and Business: A case of 3D printing in China // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 136, pp. 208–221. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.03010.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Jucevicius, G., Grumadaite, K. (2014). Smart Development of Innovation Ecosystem // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 156, pp. 125–129. doi: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2014.11.133.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.133]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Giest, S. (2019). Trust Dynamics in Innovation Networks: The Chicago Life Science Cluster // Administration & Society. Vol. 51, Issue 2, pp. 325–324. doi: 10.1177%2F009539971770152210.1177/0095399717701522]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Valkokari, K, Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., Jylhä-Ollila, S. (2017). Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies // Technology Innovation Management Review. Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 12–24. doi: 10.22215/timreview/106110.22215/timreview/1061]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lundvall, B. A., Borrás, S., (2004). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy // The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Vol. 1. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Ramberg, I., Knell, M. (2012). Challenges measuring effects of research and innovation policy interventions in ex-post impact evaluations. A synthesis report. Internet access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260552896_Challenges_measuring_effects_of_research_and_innovation_policy_interventions_in_expost_impact_evaluations_A_synthesis_report [accessed August, 27 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Varga, A., Sebestyén, T., Szabó, N., Szerb, L. (2018). Estimating the Economic Impacts of Knowledge Network and Entrepreneurship Development in Smart Specialization Policy // Regional studies. Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 48–59. Doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.152702610.1080/00343404.2018.1527026]Search in Google Scholar
[15. OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation. Enhancing Research Performance through Evaluation, Impact Assessment and Priority Setting. Internet access: https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/Enhancing-Public-Research-Performance.pdf [accessed August 27, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[16. European Commission. (2018). Science, Research and Innovation Performance 2018, Chapter I.4. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/srip-report-chap-1-4_2018_en.pdf [accessed November 16, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[17. European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2015). Efficiency Estimates of Health Care Systems. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2015/pdf/ecp549_en.pdf [accessed January 29, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[18. McKinsey & Company (2019). Precision Medicine: Opening the Aperture. Internet access: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/precision-medicine-opening-the-aperture [accessed August 14, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[19. ScienceDirect, online database of scientific and medical research. Internet access: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/economic-policy [accessed August 15, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Open Innovation community, online platform. Internet access: http://openinnovation.net/about-2/open-innovation-definition/ [accessed August 15, 2019].]Search in Google Scholar