[Armstrong Soule, C.A. and Madrigal, R. (2015)*, “Anchors and norms in anonymous pay-what-you-want pricing contexts”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 167-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Atlas, S. (2015)*, “Rebate what you want”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 43, p. 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azar, O.H. (2007), “The social norm of tipping: A review”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 37, pp. 380-402.10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00165.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2011), “A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 924-973.10.1177/0899764010380927]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertini, M. and Koenigsberg, O. (2014), “When customers help set prices”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 57-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bondos, I. and Lipowski, M. (2016)*, “Effectiveness of PWYW – Are there interchannel differences?”, in: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference 2016 Management, Knowledge and Learning, May 25-27, Timisoara. Available at http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-16-1/papers/ML16-033.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Borck, R., Frank, B. and Robledo J.R. (2006)*, “An empirical analysis of voluntary payments for information goods on the Internet”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 18, pp. 229-239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourreau, M., Dogan, P. and Hong, S. (2015)*, “Making money by giving it for free: Radiohead’s pre-release strategy for In Rainbows”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 37, pp. 77-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chao, Y., Fernandez, J. and Nahata, B. (2015), “Pay-what-you-want pricing: Can it be profitable?”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 176-185.10.1016/j.socec.2014.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Z. and Liang, X. (2014), “The performance of pay-as-you-wish pricing with relational and forward-looking customers”, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), June 25-27, Beijing. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6943418 (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dorn, T. and Suessmair, A. (2016)*, “Is it really worth it? A test of pay-what-you-want pricing strategies in a German consumer behavior context”, Global Business and Economics Review, Vol. 18, pp. 82-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drevs, F. (2013)*, “The challenge of the unknown – The effect of pay-what-you-want on the market success of publicly subsidized films”, Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Vol. 36, pp. 255-270.]Search in Google Scholar
[El Harbi, S., Grolleau, G. and Bekir, I. (2014), “Substituting piracy with a pay-what-you-want option: Does it make sense?”, European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 37, No. 2., pp. 277-297.10.1007/s10657-011-9287-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel, C. (2011), “Dictator games: A meta study”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 583-610.10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Fay, S. (2004), “Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel”, Marketing Science, Vol. 23, pp. 407-418.10.1287/mksc.1040.0062]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernandez, J. and Nahata, B. (2009), “Pay what you like”, MPRA Paper No. 16265, Louisville University. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16265/ (accessed December 13, 2016).10.2139/ssrn.1433845]Search in Google Scholar
[Gahler, M. (2016)*, Pay-What-You-Want im Internet, Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-12201-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Gautier, P.A. and Van der Klaauw, B. (2012)*, “Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 27, pp. 63-84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L.D. and Brown, A. (2010)*, “Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving”, Science, Vol. 329, pp. 325-327.10.1126/science.1186744]Search in Google Scholar
[Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L.D. (2012)*, “Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, pp. 7236-7240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gravert, C. (2014)*, “Pride and patronage – The effect of identity on pay-what-you-want prices at a charitable bookstore”, Economics Working Papers 2014-04, Aarhus University. Available at http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/68738741/wp14_04.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Greene, W.H. (2013), Econometric analysis (7th ed.), Pearson: New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greiff, M. and Egbert, H. (2016), “A survey of the empirical evidence on PWYW pricing”, MPRA Paper No. 68693, Justus-Liebig University Giessen and Anhalt University of Applied Sciences. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68693/ (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Greiff, M., Egbert, H. and Xhangolli, K. (2014), “Pay what you want – But pay enough! Information asymmetries and PWYW pricing”, Management & Marketing, Vol. 9, pp. 193-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilbert, L.P. and Suessmair, A. (2015)*, “The effects of social interaction and social norm compliance in pay-what-you-want situations”, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 5, pp. 548-556.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hildenbrand, A., Pabst, E., Schilling, U., Bitsch, L. and Hanf, J.H. (2016)*, “Der Pay-What-You-Want-Mechanismus als Preissetzungsmechanismus für einverkostungen“, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics, September 15–16, Vienna.10.24989/OEGA.JB.26.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, F., Appelmann, E. and Lenzen, M. (2016), Pay-What-You-Want, Eul: Lohmar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, F., Lenzen, M., Meyer, F. and Appelmann, E. (2013)*, “The role of altruistic and egoistic motivations in pay what you want situations”, in: Kubacki, K. (Ed.), Ideas in Marketing: Finding the New and Polishing the Old – Proceedings of the 2013 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) annual conference, Springer: New York, pp. 28-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, F., Meyer, F. and Appelmann, E. (2014)*, “The moderating role of loyalty and satisfaction on the effectiveness of altruistic and egoistic motivation in pay what you want situations”, Paper presented at the Association of Consumer Research European Conference.10.1007/978-3-319-10951-0_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Isaac, R.M., Lightle, J.P. and Norton, D.A. (2015), “The pay-what-you-want business model: Warm glow revenues and endogenous price discrimination”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 215-223.10.1016/j.socec.2015.02.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Jang, H. and Chu, W. (2012)*, “Are consumers acting fairly toward companies? An examination of pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 32, pp. 348-360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, J.W. and Cui, A.P. (2013)*, “To influence or not to influence: External reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, pp. 275-281.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jostrup, E. and Salic, E. (2015)*, “Pay for it and love it more: A comparative study in marketing psychology between the two campaign methods pay what you want and free”, Bachelor psychology course student paper, Department of Psychology, Lund University. Available at http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=7365833&fileOId=7365971 (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jung, M.H., Nelson, L.D., Gneezy, A. and Gneezy, U. (2014a), “Paying more when paying for others”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 107, pp. 414-431.10.1037/a0037345]Search in Google Scholar
[Jung, M.H., Nelson, L.D., Gneezy, A. and Gneezy, U. (2014b)*, “Signaling virtue: Charitable behavior under consumer elective pricing”, SSRN paper 2447960. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2447960&download=yes (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jung, M.H., Perfecto, H. and Nelson, L.D. (2016)*, “Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field experimental settings”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53, pp. 354-368.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahsay, G.A. and Samahita, M. (2015), “Pay-what-you-want pricing schemes: A self-image perspective”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Vol. 7, pp. 17-28.10.1016/j.jbef.2015.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.-Y., Kaufmann, K. and Stegemann, M. (2014a)*, “The impact of buyer-seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, pp. 409-423.10.1007/s11002-013-9261-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009)*, “Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 44-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2010a)*, “Pay-what-you-want – Praxisrelevanz und Konsumentenverhalten“, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 80, pp. 147-169.10.1007/s11573-009-0345-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2010b)*, “Kish: Where customers pay as they wish”, Review of Marketing Science, Vol. 8, Article 3, pp. 1-12.10.2202/1546-5616.1118]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2014b)*, “Sampling, discounts or pay-what-you-want: Two field experiments”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 31, pp. 327-334.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Krämer, F., Schmidt, K.M., Spann, M. and Stich, L. (2015)*, “Delegating pricing power to customers: Pay what you want or name your own price”, Discussion Paper No. 10605, Centre for Economic Policy Research London. Available at http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10605 (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawczyk, M., Kukla-Gryz, A. and Tyrowicz, J. (2015)*, “Pushed by the crowd or pulled by the leaders? Peer effects in pay-what-you-want”, Faculty of Economic Sciences Working Papers No. 25/2015 (173), University of Warsaw. Available at http://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/files/1514/3872/2613/WNE_WP173.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunter, M. (2015)*, “Exploring the Pay-What-You-Want payment motivation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, pp. 2347-2357.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunter, M. and Braun, D. (2013)*, “The price is up to you!” – “Oh no! What am I gonna do?” Customers’ product category inexperience and belief about other customers’ payments under pay-what-you-want conditions, European Journal of Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 15-21.10.18374/EJM-13-2.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, S.R., Baumgartner, H. and Pieters, R. (2011)*, “Are you really paying what you wish? Interpersonal influences on price decisions”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 39, pp. 540-541.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, S.R., Baumgartner, H. and Pieters, R. (2015)*, Are you really paying as little as possible? Constraints on consumers’ self-interest seeking in participative pricing, Unpublished manuscript.]Search in Google Scholar
[León, F.J., Noguera, J.A. and Tena-Sánchez, J. (2012)*, “How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato”, Social Science Information, Vol. 51, pp. 389-417.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, M. (1990), “Choose your own price: An exploratory study requiring an expanded view of price’s functions”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 710-714.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, M., Flynn, S.M. and Helion, C. (2013)*, “Do consumers prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 36, pp. 96-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machado, F. and Sinha, R.K. (2012)*, “The viability of pay what you want pricing”, Manuscript submitted to Management Science. Available at http://ebape.fgv.br/sites/ebape.fgv.br/files/Working-Paper-Fernando-Machado-Viability-of-Pay-What-you-Want-Pricing.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mak, V., Zwick, R., Rao, A.R. and Pattaratanakun, J.A. (2015)*, “’Pay what you want’ as threshold public good provision”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 127, pp. 30-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marett, K., Pearson, R. and Moore, R.S. (2012)*, “Pay what you want: An exploratory study of social exchange and buyer-determined prices of iProducts”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 30, Article 10, pp. 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.P. and Sinha, I. (2005), “Reference price research: Review and propositions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 84-102.10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84]Search in Google Scholar
[Mendoza-Abarca, K.I. and Mellema, H.N. (2016), “Aligning economic and social value creation through pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 7, pp. 101-125.10.1080/19420676.2015.1015437]Search in Google Scholar
[Mills, P. (2011)*, “Economic and financial insights from a cross-cultural pay-what-you-want study”, in: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Behavioral Finance and Economics, September 21-23, Los Angeles. Available at https://p11.secure.hostingprod.com/@www.aobf.org/ssl/attachments/2011/ABF_2011_Proceedings_Book.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mills, P. (2013)*, “Trust, reciprocity and fairness in a large scale pay what you wish experiment”, in: Competitive Paper Session, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics, SABE/IAREP(ICABEEP conference, Atlanta. Available at http://apps.clayton.edu/SABE-IAREP-ICABEEP-Conference/Papers/Download/26 (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mousazadeh, M. and Izadkhah, M. (2015): “The ultimatum game: A comprehensive literature review”, Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 158-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Natter, M. and Kaufmann, K. (2015), “Voluntary market payments: Underlying motives, success drivers and success potentials”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 149-157.10.1016/j.socec.2015.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Newholm, T. and Shaw, D. (2007), “Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 6, pp. 253-270.10.1002/cb.225]Search in Google Scholar
[Park, S., Nam, S. and Lee, J. (2016)*, “Charitable giving, suggestion, and learning from others: Pay-What-You-Want experiments at a coffee shop”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, in press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.010.10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Parvinen, P., Pöyry, E. and Kaptein, M. (2013)*, “Pay-what-you-want pricing – The impact of framing”, Paper presented at the American Marketing Association Winter Marketing Educator Conference, February 15-17, Las Vegas, 110-121. Available at http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/86740067/pay-what-you-want-pricing-impact-framing (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perfecto, H., Jung, M.H. and Nelson, L.D., (2014)*, “Precision aversion in pay-what-you-want pricing”, in: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society of Consumer Research, March 6-8, Miami. Available at http://www.myscp.org/pdf/conference%20documents/SCP2014_Proceedings_04282014.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perfecto, H., Jung, M.H., Nelson, L.D., Gneezy, A. and Gneezy, U. (2013)*, “Default effects under pay-what-you-want: Evidence from the field”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 41, pp. 265-266.]Search in Google Scholar
[Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879]Search in Google Scholar
[Pöyry, E. (2015), “Pay-what-you-want pricing research: Review and propositions”, in: Ahearne, M. and Hughes, D.E. (Eds.), 2015 AMA Marketing Summer Educators’ Conference “Improving Business Practice Through Marketing Insight”, August 14-16, Chicago, Vol. 26, L-23-L-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pöyry, E. and Parvinen, P. (2014)*, “Pay-what-you-want – A field experiment on anonymity and reference price cues”, in: Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A.L., and Nordfält, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the “Shopper Marketing & Pricing Conference”, May 8-10, Stockholm, 18-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pöyry, E., Parvinen, P. and Kaptein, M. (2013)*, “Using pay-what-you-want in new product pricing”, in: Proceedings of the 2013 Aalto University-GAMMA Joint Symposium, April 26, Helsinki, 54-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Racherla, P., Babb, J.S. and Keith, M.J. (2011)*, “Pay-what-you-want pricing for mobile applications: The effect of privacy assurances and social information”, in: Proceedings of the 4th Information Systems Applied Research Conference, November 3-6, Wilmington. Available at http://proc.conisar.org/2011/pdf/1833.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reese, J.D. (2012)*, Participatory pricing in sport: An examination of name-your-own-price and pay-what-you-want, Dissertation Texas A&M University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reese, J.D. (2013)*, “Participatory pricing in sport: An examination of name-your-own-price and pay-what-you-want”, Faculty Publications Paper 12, Stephen F. Austin State University at Nacogdoches, Texas. Available at http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=management_facultypubs (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Regner, T. (2014), “Social preferences? Google Answers!”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 85, pp. 188-209.10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Regner, T. (2015)*, “Why consumers pay voluntarily: Evidence from online music”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 205-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regner, T. and Barria, J.A. (2009)*, “Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 71, pp. 395-406.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regner, T. and Riener, G. (2012)*, “Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the Internet: A natural field experiment”, Institute for Competition Economics Discussion Paper No. 82, University of Dusseldorf. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/10419/68231/1/734357842.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Riener, G. (2008)*, “How free is your lunch: Evidence from an “Eat-as-you-want-pay-as-you-wish” restaurant”, University of Essex. Available at http://deewan.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Riener.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012)*, “Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a pay-what-you-want restaurant”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 476-483.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, R. (2015)*, “An insight into pay-what-you-want pricing”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 733-748.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, R., Rabbanee, F.K. and Sharma, P. (2016a)*, “Exploring the interactions among external reference price, social visibility and purchase motivation in pay-what-you-want pricing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, pp. 816-837.10.1108/EJM-10-2014-0609]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, R., Rabbanee, F.K. and Sharma, P. (2016b)*, “Antecedents, outcomes, and mediating role of internal reference prices in pay-what-you-want pricing”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 34, pp. 117-136.10.1108/MIP-08-2015-0157]Search in Google Scholar
[Saccardo, S. and Gneezy, A. (2014)*, “Want vs. can: Self-signaling via participative price appeals”, in: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Society of Consumer Research, March 6-8, Miami. Available at http://www.myscp.org/pdf/conference%20documents/SCP2014_Proceedings_04282014.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Saccardo, S., Li, C., Samek, A. and Gneezy, A. (2015)*, “Shifting mindset in consumer elective pricing”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 43, pp. 7-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Santana, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2011)*, “Buying what you can get for free: How self-presentation motives influence payment decisions in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 39, pp. 253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Santana, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2013)*, “We’re in this together: How sellers, social values, and relationship norms influence consumer payments in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Manuscript submitted to Journal of Marketing. Available at http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/programs/sites/programs/files/marketing/seminar_papers/paper_santana_fa13.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Santana, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2015)*, “Because we’re partners: How social values and relationship norms influence consumer payments in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 43, pp. 8-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Santana, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2016)*, “Because we’re partners: How social values and relationship norms influence consumer payments in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Manuscript submitted to Journal of Marketing Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlüter, A. and Vollan, B. (2015), “Flowers and an honour box: Evidence on framing effects”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 186-199.10.1016/j.socec.2014.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, K.M., Spann, M. and Zeithammer, R. (2015)*, “Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets”, Management Science, Vol. 61, pp. 1217-1236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schons, L.M., Rese, M., Wieseke, J., Rasmussen, W., Weber, D. and Strotmann, W.-C. (2014)*, “There is nothing permanent except change – Analyzing individual price dynamics in “pay-what-you-want” situations”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, pp. 25-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schröder, M., Lüer, A. and Sadrieh, A. (2015)*, “Pay-what-you-want or mark-off-your-own-price – A framing effect in customer-selected pricing”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 200-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sleesman, D.J. and Conlon, D.E. (2016) )*, “Encouraging prosocial decisions: The role of fairness salience and uncertainty”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, in Press, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1970.10.1002/bdm.1970]Search in Google Scholar
[Small, D.A. and Cryder, C. (2016), “Prosocial consumer behavior”, Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 107-111.10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Stegemann, M. (2014)*, Success factors of pay what you want pricing, Dissertation University of Muenster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steiner, F. (1997), “Optimal pricing of museum admission”, Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 307-333.10.1023/A:1007432901540]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, S. and Gierl, H. (2014)*, “Pay what you want: How to affect the price consumers are willing to pay”, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Research in Advertising, June 26-28, Amsterdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tudón, J.F. (2015), “Pay what you want because I don’t know how much to charge you”, Economic Letters, Vol. 137, pp. 41-44.10.1016/j.econlet.2015.10.021]Search in Google Scholar
[Veit, K. and Ammermann, S. (2013)*, Why would you pay? An exploratory study in pay-what-you-want pricing, Masters Thesis, School of Economics and Management, Lund University. Available at (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ven, L. van de (2012)*, Fair play via fair pay: A PWYW pricing strategy for fairtrade, Master Thesis, School of Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam. Available at http://www.rsm.nl/fileadmin/Images_NEW/Events/Sustainability_Forum/Thesis_Laura_van_de_Ven_RSM_2012_2013.pdf (accessed December 13, 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Waskow, S., Markett, S., Montag, C., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Kramarz, V. and Reuter, M. (2016)*, “Pay what you want! A pilot study on neural correlates of voluntary payments for music”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, in press, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01023.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01023]Search in Google Scholar
[Weisstein, F.L., Kukar-Kinney, M. and Monroe, K.B. (2016)*, “Determinants of consumers’ response to pay-what-you-want pricing strategy on the Internet”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, pp. 4313-4320.]Search in Google Scholar
