Does Zipf’s law hold for Polish cities?

Alperovich, G & Deutsch, J 1995, ‘The size distribution of urban areas: Testing for the appropriateness of the Pareto distribution using a generalized Box-Cox transformation function’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 35, pp. 267–276.10.1111/j.1467-9787.1995.tb01258.xSearch in Google Scholar

Auerbach, F 1913, ‘Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration’, Petermann’s Geographische Mitteilungen, vol. 59, pp. 74–76.Search in Google Scholar

Bee, M, Riccaboni, M & Schiavo, S 2013, ‘The size distribution of US cities: Not Pareto, even in the tail’, Economics Letters, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 232–237.10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.035Search in Google Scholar

Berry, BJL & Okulicz-Kozaryn, A 2011, ‘The city size distribution debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas’, Cities, vol. 29, Supplement 1, pp. 17–23.10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Black, D & Henderson, V 2003, ‘Urban evolution in the USA’, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 3, pp. 343–372.10.1093/jeg/lbg017Search in Google Scholar

Bosker, EM, Brakman, S, Garretsen, H & Schramm, M 2008, ‘A century of shocks: the evolution of the German city size distribution 1925 – 1999’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 38, pp. 330–347.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Brakman, S, Garretsen, H & van Marrewijk, C 2009, The New Introduction to Geographical Economics, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511818745Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, TA 1990. ‘One-stage structural models to explain city size’. Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 27, pp. 294–307.10.1016/0094-1190(90)90003-6Search in Google Scholar

CSO 2011, Ludność w gminach. Stan w dniu 31 marca 2011 r. - wyniki spisu ludności i mieszkań 2011 r., Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Deichmann, U & Henderson, V 2000, ‘Urban and regional dynamics in Poland’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2457.10.1596/1813-9450-2457Search in Google Scholar

Eeckhout, J 2004, ‘Gibrat’s law for (all) cities’, American Economic Review, vol. 94, no.5, pp. 1429–1451.10.1257/0002828043052303Search in Google Scholar

Fazio, G & Modica, M 2015, ‘Pareto or log-normal? Best fit and truncation in the distribution of all cities’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 736–756.10.1111/jors.12205Search in Google Scholar

Gabaix, X 1999, ‘Zipf’s law and the growth of the cities’, American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 129–132.10.1257/aer.89.2.129Search in Google Scholar

Gabaix, X & Ioannides, YM 2004, ‘The evolution of city size distributions’ in The Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, vol. IV, eds. JV Henderson and J-F Thisse, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 2341–2380.10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80010-5Search in Google Scholar

Gabaix, X & Ibragimov, R 2011, ‘Rank-1/2: A simple way to improve the OLS estimation of tail exponents’, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 24–39.10.1198/jbes.2009.06157Search in Google Scholar

Giesen, K, Zimmermann, A & Suedekum, J 2010, ‘The size distribution across all cities-double Pareto lognormal strikes’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 129–137.10.1016/j.jue.2010.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Val, R, Ramos, A, Sanz-Gracia, F & Vera-Cabello, M 2015, ‘Size distributions for all cities: Which one is best?’, Papers in Regional Science, vol. 94(1), pp. 177–196.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, BM 1975, ‘A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution’, Annals of Statistics, vol. 3(5), pp. 1163–1174.10.1214/aos/1176343247Search in Google Scholar

Ioannides, Y & Skouras, S 2013, ‘US city size distribution: Robustly Pareto, but only in the tail’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 18–29.10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Lotka, AJ 1925, Elements of Physical Biology, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, A 1920, Principles of Economics, Macmillan. London.Search in Google Scholar

Modica, M 2014, ‘Does the EU have homogeneous urban structure area? The role of agglomeration and the impact of shocks on urban structure’ in ERSA conference papers, no. 14, p. 229, European Regional Science Association.Search in Google Scholar

Necula, C, Ibragimov, M, Valetka, U, Bobeica, G, Radu, AN, Mukhamedkhanova, K & Radyna, A 2010, ‘City size distribution dynamics in transition economies. A cross-country investigation’. Available from: <https://www.cerge.cuni.cz/pdf/gdn/irp/IRP-cities-growth-rates-necula-ibragimov-valetka.pdf>. [10 February 2016].Search in Google Scholar

Nitsch, V 2005, ‘Zipf zipped’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 57, pp. 86–100.10.1016/j.jue.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, KT & Resnick, M 1980, ‘The size distribution of cities: an examination of the Pareto law and primacy’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 8, pp. 165–86.10.1016/0094-1190(80)90043-1Search in Google Scholar

Soo, KT 2005, ‘Zipf’s law for cities: a cross-country investigation’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 35, pp. 239–63.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Veneri, P 2016, ‘City size distribution across the OECD: Does the definition of cities matter?’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 59, pp. 86–94.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, GK 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology, Addison-Wesley, New York.Search in Google Scholar