The Development and Design of Engineering Economic Indicator System for Nanotechnology Industry Product Manufacturing: A Case Study of Latvia / Inženierekonomisko Rādītāju Sistēmas Attīstība Un Izveide Nanotehnoloģiju Industrijas Produktu Ražošanai: Latvijas Pieredze

1. Geipele, I., Staube, T., Ciemlejа, G., Zeltins, N., Ekmanis, J. (2015). Identity of Innovative Multifunctional Material Manufacturing Business in Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences. 52 (4), 3-18. DOI: 10.1515/LPTS-2015-0019.10.1515/lpts-2015-0019Search in Google Scholar

2. Ministry of Education and Science of Latvia (2007). Study of Mechanical Engineering and Metalworking Industries of Latvia. Retrieved from http://visc.gov.lv/profizglitiba/dokumenti/metmat/aprobacija/1-NO/1-NO-MetalapstradesNozare/1-NO-M-NozaresApraksts.pdf (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar

3. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2014). Research and Development Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.csb.gov.lv/sites/default/files/publikacijas/nr_36_petniecibas_statistika_14_00_lv.pdf (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar

4. Es-Sadki, N., & Hollanders, H. (2014). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. European Union, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ministry of Education and Science of Latvia (2013). About Development of Smart Specialisation Strategy. Retrieved from http://tap.mk.gov.lv/mk/tap/?pid=40291636 (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar

6. Liu, Z. & Sha, J. (2012). Static and dynamic analysis of industrial structure in Inner Mongolia based on BCG matrix. In 2012 Int. Conf. on Social Science and and Environment Protection, 9-11 November 2012 (pp. 3-8). Jiujiang, China: Science and Engineering Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

7. Urbahs, A., Urbaha, M., Savkovs, K., & Andrejeva, D. (2015). Protective Antifriction Multilayer Coating by Ion-Plasma Sputtering Development Technological Process Analysis. In Mechanika 2015: 20th Int. Scientific Conf., 23-24 April, 2015 (pp.253-256). Kaunas, Lithuania: Kaunas University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

8. The Boston consulting Group. Most Deals Aim for Technology and Segment Leadership. Retrieved from: https://www.bcgperspectives.com/.Search in Google Scholar

9. The Boston consulting Group (2014). The Shifting Economics of Global Manufacturing: How Cost Competitiveness Is Changing Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/lean_manufacturing_globalization_shifting_economics_global_manufacturing/.Search in Google Scholar

10. Internet Center for Management and Business Administration. The BCG Growth-Share Matrix. Retrieved from: http://www.netmba.com/strategy/matrix/bcg/.Search in Google Scholar

11. Grieger, K. D., Laurent, A., Miseljic, M., Christensen, F., Baun, A., & Olsen, S. I. (2012). Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals? Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14 (7), 1-23. DOI:10.1007/s11051-012-0958-6.10.1007/s11051-012-0958-6Search in Google Scholar

12. Hischier, R., & Walser, T. (2012). Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. Science of the Total Environment. 425, 271-282. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.001.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.00122483746Search in Google Scholar

13. Som, C., Berges, M., Chaudhry, Q., Dusinska, M., Fernandes, T. F., Olsen, S. I., & Nowack, B. (2010). The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. Toxicology. 269 (2), 160-169. DOI:10.1016/j.tox.2009.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hanks, S. H., Watson, C. J., Jansen, E., & Chandler, G. N. (1993). Tightening the life cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high technology organizations. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 18 (2), 5-30.Search in Google Scholar

15. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. A. (1984). Longitudinal study of the corporate life-cycle. Management Science. 30, 1161-1183.10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161Search in Google Scholar

16. Warusawitharana, M. (2012). Profitability and the Lifecycle of Firms. Federal Reserve Board, WP 2012-63.Search in Google Scholar

17. Robinson, K. C., & McDougall, P. P. (2001). Entry Barriers and New Venture Performance: A Comparison of Universal and Contingency Approaches. Strategic Management Journal. 22 (6/7), 659-685. DOI: 10.1002/smj.186.10.1002/smj.186Search in Google Scholar

18. Hardman, R. (2006). A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors. Environmental Health Perspectives. 114 (2), 165-172. DOI:10.1289/ehp.8284.10.1289/ehp.8284136782616451849Search in Google Scholar

19. Bhat, J. S. A. (2005). Concerns of new technology based industries - the case of nanotechnology. Technovation. 25 (5), 457-462. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.001.10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.001Search in Google Scholar

20. Thukral, I.S., Von Ehr, J., Walsh, S., Greon, A.J., Van de Sijde, P., & Adham, K.A. (2008). Entrepreneurship, emerging technologies, emerging markets. International Small Business Journal. 26 (1), 101-116. DOI: 10.1177/0266242607084656.10.1177/0266242607084656Search in Google Scholar

21. Walsh, S. (2004). Roadmapping a disruptive technology: A case study the emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 71 (1), 161-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2003.10.003.10.1016/j.techfore.2003.10.003Search in Google Scholar

22. Adamsone-Fiskovica, A. (2012). Science-society relations in Latvia: communicative practices and discourses. Doctoral thesis. Riga: Zinatne, 252 p. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2769.2489 (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

23. Society Institute for Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility. Sustainability Index. Retrieved from: http://incsr.eu/lv/novertejums/ilgtspejas-indekss/ (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar

24. European Union Research and Innovation (2014). Research and Innovation performance in the EU. Innovation Union progress at country level. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/state-of-the-union/2014/iuc_progress_report_2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

25. Bertelsmann Stiftung (2014). Sustainable governance indicators SGI. 2014 Rule of Law Report. Retrieved from: http://www.sgi-network.org/docs/2014/thematic/SGI2014_Rule_of_Law.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

26. Tambovceva, T., Geipele I. (2011). Environmental Management Systems Experience among Latvian Construction Companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 17 (3), 491-506. DOI:10.3846/20294913.2011.603179.10.3846/20294913.2011.603179Search in Google Scholar

27. European Union Health Portal (2010). The Assessment Problems of Risk Caused by Nanomaterials. Health-EU. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/newsletter/59/newsletter_lv.htm (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar

28. ICMM International Council on Mining & Metals (2014) Health and safety performance indicators. Report January 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.icmm.com/document/6613. Search in Google Scholar

29. Information system. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/287895/information-system.Search in Google Scholar

30. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia (2010). Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030. Retrieved from: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B7A5865F-0D1B-42AE-A838-FBA4CA31674D/0/Latvia_2010.pdf. Search in Google Scholar