Acceso abierto

Adaptive Intervention Methodology for Reduction of Respondent Contact Burden in the American Community Survey


Cite

Bates, N., J. Dahlhamer, P. Phipps, A. Safir, and L. Tan. 2010. “Assessing Contact History Paradata Quality Across Several Federal Surveys.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Vancouver, BC, July 31-August 5, 2010. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 91–105. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2010/Files/306005_55654.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Bates, N., J. Dahlhamer, and E. Singer. 2008. “Privacy Concerns, Too Busy, or Just Not Interested: Using Doorstep Concerns to Predict Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 591–612.Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P.P., P. Chen, and K. Wang. 2013. “Using Level-of-Effort Paradata in Non-Response Adjustments with Application to Field Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 176: 147–168. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bothwell, L. and S. Podolsky. 2016. “The Emergence of the Randomized, Controlled Trial.” New England Journal of Medicine 375: 501–504. Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1604635.10.1056/NEJMp160463527509097Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bradburn, N. 1978. “Respondent Burden.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, San Diego, California, August 14–17, 1978. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 35–40. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/papers/1978_007.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. Design and Methodology: American Community Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/methodology/design-and-methodology.html (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Dyer, W. 2004. “Contact History Instrument.” In IBUC Proceedings, International Blaise Users Conference, Qubec, Canada, September 22–24, 2004. International Blaise Users Group. 35–61. Available at: www.blaiseusers.org/2004/papers/03.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, T. 1967. Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach. Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S., T. Yan, and S. Tsai. 2014. “Response Burden: What Predicts It and Who is Burdened Out?” In AAPOR Proceedings, American Association for Public Opinion Research, Anaheim, California, May 15–18, 2014. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. 4568–4577. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st140170.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D. 2013. “Effect of Changing Call Parameters in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing Operation.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS13-RER-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Griffin_03.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D. 2014. “Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Visit Interviewing Operation – Phase 2 Results.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS14-RER-07. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2014/acs/2014_Griffin_01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D. and T. Hughes. 2013. “Analysis of Alternative Call Parameters in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS13-RER-11. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Griffin_02.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D. and D. Nelson. 2014. “Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Visit Interviewing Operation – Phase 1 Results (Part 2).” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS14-RER-22. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2014/acs/2014_Griffin_02.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D., E. Slud, and C. Erdman. 2015. “Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Visit Interviewing Operations – Phase 3 Results.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS14-RER-28-R1. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2015/acs/2015_Griffin_01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R. and S. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistics Society: Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., J. Wagner, and E. Peytcheva. 2007. “Use of Interviewer Judgments about Attributes of Selected Respondents in Post-Survey Adjustment for Unit Nonresponse: An Illustration with the National Survey of Family Growth.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 29-August 2, 2007. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 3428–3431. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2007/Files/JSM2007-000782.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Hedlin, D., Dale, T., Haraldsen, G., and Jones, J. eds. 2005. Developing Methods for Assessing Perceived Response Burden. Research Report. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, Oslo: Statistics Norway, and London: Office for National Statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/10-DEVELOPING-METHODS-FOR-ASSESSING-PERCEIVED-RESPONSE-BURDEN.pdf/1900efc8-1a07-4482-b3c9-be88ee71df3b (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, T., E. Slud, R. Ashmead, and R. Walsh. 2016. “Results of a Field Pilot to Reduce Respondent Contact Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing Operation.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS16-RER-07. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Hughes_01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Klein, J. and M. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag.10.1007/b97377Search in Google Scholar

Kreuter, F., K. Olson, K.J. Wagner, T. Yan, T. Ezzati-Rice, C. Casas-Cordero, M. Lemay, A. Peytchev, R. Groves, and T. Raghunathan. 2010. “Using Proxy Measures and Other Correlates of Survey Outcomes to Adjust for Non-response: Examples from Multiple Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 173: 389–407. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00621.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00621.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: An Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 176: 169–189. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maitland, A., C. Casas-Cordero, and F. Kreuter. 2009. “An Evaluation of Nonresponse Bias using Paradata from a Health Survey.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, August 1–6, 2009. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 370–378. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2009/Files/303004.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Mills, G. 2016. “Simulated Effects of Changing Calling Parameters and Workload Size on Computer Assisted Telephone Interview Productivity in the American Community Survey.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS16-RER-22. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Mills_02.pdf (accessed August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Olson, K. and R. Groves. 2012. “An Examination of Within-Person Variation in Response Propensity over the Data Collection Field Period.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 29–51.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, L. and J. Frankel. 1983. “Respondent Burden: A Test of Some Common Assumptions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 36–53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/268765.10.1086/268765Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Slud, E. 1998. “Predictive Models for Decennial Census Household Response.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Dallas, Texas, August 9–13, 1998. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. 272–277. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/papers/1998_043.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Slud, E. 1999. “Analysis of 1990 Decennial Census Checkin-Time Data.” In FCSM Proceedings Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Washington, DC, November 15–17, 1999. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wp-content/uploads/sites/242/2014/05/IX-B_Slud_FCSM1999.pdf (accessed August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Slud, E. and C. Erdman. 2013. “Adaptive Curtailment of Survey Follow-up Based on Contact History Data.” In FCSM Proceedings Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Washington, DC, November 4–6, 2013. 1–11. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wpcontent/uploads/sites/242/2014/05/B1_Slud_2013 FCSM.pdf (accessed August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Virgile, M. 2015. “Measurement Error in American Community Survey Paradata and 2014 Redesign of the Contact History Instrument.” Center for Statistical Research and Methodology Report Series (Survey Methodology #RSM2016-01). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/RSM2016-01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J. and T. Raghunathan. 2010. “A New Stopping Rule for Surveys.” Statistics in Medicine 29: 1014–1024. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3834.10.1002/sim.383420131311Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zelenak, M.F. and M. Davis. 2013. “Impact of Multiple Contacts by Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview and Computer-Assisted Personal Interview on Final Interview Outcome in the American Community Survey.” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS13-RER-08. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Zelenak_01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Zelenak, M.F. 2014. “Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Visit Interviewing Operation – Phase 1 Results (Part 1).” American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS14-RER-06. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2014/acs/2014_Zelenak_01.pdf (accessed February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics