[Alho, J.M. and B.D. Spencer. 2005. Statistical Demography and Forecasting. New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakker, C. 2014. Valuing the Census. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand. Available at: www.stats.govt.nz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, J.O. 1985. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhutta, Z.A., J.K. Das, A. Rizvi, M.F. Gaff, N. Walker, S. Horton, P. Webb, A. Lartey, and R.E. Black. 2013. “Evidence-based Interventions for Improvement of Maternal and Child Nutrition: What Can Be Done and at What Cost?” Lancet 382: 452-477.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradshaw, D., D. Bourne, and N. Nannan. 2003. “What Are the Leading Causes of Death among South African Children?” MRC Policy Brief, No 3., Medical Research Council, Bellville.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buehler, J.W. and D.R. Holtgrave. 2007. “Challenges in Defining an Optimal Approach to Formula-Based Allocations of Public Health Funds in the United States.” BMC Public Health 7: 44. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-44.10.1186/1471-2458-7-44185170817394645]Search in Google Scholar
[Cope, I. 2015. The Value of Census Statistics in England and Wales. Note by the Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom. United Nations Economic and Social Council, 4 September 2015. Report ECE/CES/GE.41/2015/16. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.41/2015/mtg1/CES_GE.41_2015_16_-_UK.pdf (accessed 25 March 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dickens, C. 1985. Bleak House. 1852-53. New York: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Downes, T.A. and T.E. Pogue. 2002. “How Best to Hand Out Money: Issues in the Design and Structure of Intergovernmental Aid Formulas.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 329-352.]Search in Google Scholar
[General Register Office for Scotland. 2006. 2011 Census Business Case. Prepared by John Aldridge, Consultant, July 2006. Available at: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/8345/response/20302/attach/3/business%20case.pdf (accessed 8 March 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruskal, W.H. 1984. “The Census as a National Ceremony.” In Federal Statistics and National Needs prepared for the Subcommittee on Energy, Nuclear Proliferation and Government Processes, an arm of the Committee on Government Affairs of the United State Senate, by the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, 177-180. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manski, C.F. 2011. “Actualist Rationality.” Theory and Decision 71: 195-210.10.1007/s11238-009-9182-y]Search in Google Scholar
[May, J., M. Dimbabo, J. Tamri, G. Wright, Z. Seeskin, and B.D. Spencer. 2013. Cost Benefit Analysis of South Africa’s Population Census, Final Report, 21 May, 2013. Bellville, South Africa: Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape.]Search in Google Scholar
[May, J. and P. Lehohla. 2005. “Counting the Costs of a 21st Century Census: South Africa’s Census 2001.” Development Southern Africa 22: 215-232.10.1080/03768350500163279]Search in Google Scholar
[McCaa, R., A. Esteve, S. Ruggles, and M. Sobek. 2006. “Using Integrated Census Microdata for Evidence-Based Policy Making: The IPUMS-International Global Initiative.” The African Statistical Journal 2: 83-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melnick, D. 2002. “The Legislative Process and the use of Indicators in Formula Allocations.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 353-370.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministry for Welfare and Population Development. 1998. White Paper on Population Policy. 7 September 1998. Pretoria: Government Gazette.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council. 1980. Estimating Population and Income of Small Areas. Panel on Small-Area Estimates of Population and Income, Committee on National Statistics. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council. 1985. Natural Gas Data Needs in a Changing Regulatory Environment. Panel on Statistics on Natural Gas, Committee on National Statistics. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council. 2003. Statistical Issues in Allocating Funds by Formula. Panel on Formula Allocations, edited by T.A. Louis, T.B. Jabine, and M.A. Gerstein. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[National Treasury. 2013. Annexure W1 to the Budget Review: Explanatory Memorandum to the Division of Revenue, National Treasury, Pretoria. Available at: http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2013/review/Annexure%20W1.pdf (accessed 1 August 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[National Treasury. 2015. Website Annexure to the 2015 Budget Review: Explanatory Memorandum to the Division of Revenue, National Treasury, Pretoria. Available at: http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2015/review/Annexure%20W1.pdf (accessed 1 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nigerian Tribune. 2016. “Towards a Credible Census.” Available at: http://tribuneonlineng.com/towards-credible-census/ (accessed 16 January 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Parliament of the Republic of South Africa. 2014. Announcements, Tablings and Committee Reports No. 95-2014 [First Session, Fifth Parliament, 19 November 2014], 3402, Cape Town. Available at: http://www.parliament.gov.za/live/commonrepository/Processed/20141124/593735_1.pdf (accessed 2 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Parliament of the United Kingdom. 2009. Draft Census (England and Wales) Order 2009 etc - Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200809/ldselect/ldmerit/176/17606.htm (accessed 8 March 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Redfern, P. 1974. “The Different Roles of Population Censuses and Interview Surveys, Particularly in the U.K. Context.” International Statistics Review 42: 131-146.10.2307/1403076]Search in Google Scholar
[Savage, I.R. 1985. “Hard-Soft Problems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80: 1-7.10.1080/01621459.1985.10477118]Search in Google Scholar
[Say, L. and R. Raine. 2007. “A Systematic Review of Inequalities in the Use of Maternal Health Care in Developing Countries: Examining the Scale of the Problem and the Importance of Context.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85: 812-817.10.2471/BLT.06.035659]Search in Google Scholar
[Schirm, A.L., A.M. Zaslavsky, and J.L. Czajka. 1999. “Large Numbers of Estimates for Small Areas.” Proceedings of the 1999 FCSM Research Conference. Available at: https://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2014/05/IV-A_Schirm_FCSM1999.pdf (accessed 7 March 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Seeskin, Z.H. and B.D. Spencer. 2015. “Effects of Census Accuracy on Apportionment of Congress and Allocations of Federal Funds.” Institute for Policy Research Working Paper WP- 15-05. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Available at: http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/papers/2015/ipr-wp-15-05.html (accessed 8 March 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sims, C.A. 1984. “Can We Measure the Benefits of Data Programs?” In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section: American Statistical Association, 60-67. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1980a. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Used to Allocate Funds. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-6099-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1980b. “Effects of Biases in Census Estimates on Evaluation of Postcensal Estimates.” In National Research Council, 1980, Estimating Population and Income of Small Areas. Panel on Small-Area Estimates of Population and Income: 232-6. Committee on National Statistics, Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1980c. “Implications of Equity and Accuracy for Undercount Adjustment: A Decision- Theoretic Approach.” In U.S. Bureau of the Census, Conference on Census Undercount: Proceedings of the 1980 Conference: 204-216. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Commerce.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1982a. “Feasibility of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Data Programs.” Evaluation Review 6: 649-672.10.1177/0193841X8200600505]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1982b. “Technical Issues in Allocation Formula Design.” Public Administration Review 4: 524-529.10.2307/976122]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.D. 1985. “Statistical Aspects of Equitable Apportionment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80: 815-822.10.1080/01621459.1985.10478188]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2011. Mid-Year Population Estimates, 2011. Report P0302. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2012a. Census 2011, Census in Brief. Report 03-01-41. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2012b. CENSUS 2011: Post Enumeration Survey, Report 03-01-46. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2014a. Annual Report 2013/2014 (Book 1). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Available at: http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/STATSAnnual_Report_2013-2014.pdf (accessed 2 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2014b. “Population Household Surveys in the Case of South Africa.” Presentation at the Workshop on Strengthening the Collection and Use of International Migration Data for Development, 18-21 November 2014, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Available at: http:// www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/events/other/workshop/docs/Session%20VI%20South%20Africa.pdf (accessed 3 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stats SA. 2016. Community Survey 2016: Technical Report 03-01-01, Statistics South Africa, Pretoria. Available at: http://cs2016.statssa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CS-2016-Technical-report_Web.pdf (accessed 1 August 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[The Globe and Mail. 2011. “Traditional Census the Only Option for 2016, Statistics Canada Says.” Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/traditional-census-the-only-option-for-2016-statistics-canada-says/article556243/ (accessed 4 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[The Guardian. 2015. “Census in Doubt as 10-year Data Collection Is Considered.” Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/19/census-in-2016-indoubt-as-10-year-data-collection-considered (accessed 4 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[The Journal. 2012. “2016 Census May Be Delayed in Government Spending Review.” Available at: http://www.thejournal.ie/2016-census-may-be-delayed-in-governmentspending-review-455663-May2012/ (accessed 4 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Yemek, E. 2005. Understanding Fiscal Decentralisation in South Africa. IDASA Budget Information Service Occasional Paper. Cape Town: Institute for Democratic Alternatives in South Africa. Available at: http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/CC107.pdf (accessed 1 March 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaslavsky, A.M. and A.L. Schirm. 2002. “Interactions between Survey Estimates and Federal Funding Formulas.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 371-391. ]Search in Google Scholar
