[Bickart, B.A. 1992. “Question-Order Effects and Brand Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Consumer Knowledge.” In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, edited by N. Schwarz and S. Sudman. 63–80. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Bishop, G.F., R.W. Oldendick, and A.J. Tuchfarber. 1983. “Effects of Filter Questions in Public Opinion Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 528–546. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268810.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bishop, G.F. 1987. “Context Effects on Self-Perceptions of Interest in Government and Public Affairs.” In Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, edited by H.-J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, and S. Sudman. 179–199. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4798-2_10]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgers, N., E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2000. “Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality.” Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 66: 60–75. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/075910630006600106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borgers, N., D. Sikkel, and J. Hox. 2004. “Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point.” Quality & Quantity 38: 17–33. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ceci, S.J., D.F. Ross, and M.P. Toglia. 1987. “Suggestibility of Children’s Memory: Psycholegal Implications.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116: 38–49. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.38.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E., N. Borgers, and A. Smits. 2004. “Pretesting Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J.M. Rothgeb, M.P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer. 409–429. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471654728.ch20]Search in Google Scholar
[Fallon, Jr., T. and M. Schwab-Stone. 1994. “Determinants of Reliability in Psychiatric Surveys of Children Aged 6–12.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 35: 1391–1408. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01282.x.7868635]Search in Google Scholar
[Festinger, L. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7: 117–140. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, M. 2005. “Children and Adolescents as Respondents: Experiments on Question Order, Response Order, Scale Effects and the Effect of Numeric Values Associated with Response Options.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 701–725.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, M. 2009. “The Reliability of Children’s Survey Responses: The Impact of Cognitive Functioning on Respondent Behavior.” In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2008. Data Collection: Challenges, Achievements and New Directions. Ottawa: StatCan. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-522-x/2008000/article/10961-eng.pdf (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gawronski, B. and J. Cesario. 2013. “Of Mice and Men: What Animal Research Can Tell Us About Context Effects on Automatic Responses in Humans.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 17: 187–215. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480096.23470281]Search in Google Scholar
[Goswami, U. 2010. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444325485]Search in Google Scholar
[Heinzel, F. 2000. “Methoden und Zugänge der Kindheitsforschung im Überblick.” In Methoden der Kindheitsforschung: Ein Überblick über Forschungszugänge zur kindlichen Perspektive, edited by F. Heinzel. 21–35. Weinheim: Juventa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, E. and H. Schuman. 1991. “Open Survey Questions as Measures of Personal Concern with Issues: A Reanalysis of Stouffer’s Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties.” In Sociological Methodology, edited by P. Marsden. 81–96. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.10.2307/270932]Search in Google Scholar
[Knäuper, B., N. Schwarz, D. Park, and A. Fritsch. 2007. “The Perils of Interpreting Age Differences in Attitude Reports: Question Order Effects Decrease with Age.” Journal of Official Statistics 23: 515–528.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kränzl-Nagl, R. and L. Wilk. 2000. “Möglichkeiten und Grenzen standardisierter Befragungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Faktoren soziale und personale Wünschbarkeit.” In Methoden der Kindheitsforschung: Ein Ü berblick über Forschungszugänge zur kindlichen Perspektive, edited by F. Heinzel. 59–75. Weinheim: Juventa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping With the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213–236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. 1999. “Survey Research.” Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537–567. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537.15012463]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. and D.F. Alwin. 1987. “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201–219. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269029.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipski, J. 2000. “Zur Verlässlichkeit der Angaben von Kindern bei standardisierten Befragungen.” In Methoden der Kindheitsforschung: Ein Überblick über Forschungszugänge zur kindlichen Perspektive, edited by F. Heinzel. 77–86. Weinheim: Juventa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, S., L. Haddon, and A. Gorzig. 2012. Children, Risk and Safety Online: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847428837.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, L.L. and T.F. Harlow. 1992. “Basking and Brooding: The Motivating Effects of Filter Questions in Surveys.” In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, edited by N. Schwarz and S. Sudman. 81–96. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_7]Search in Google Scholar
[McNeal, J.U. 1992. Kids as Customers: A Handbook of Marketing to Children. New York: Lexington Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Preacher, K.J. 2002. Calculation for the Test of the Difference Between Two Independent Correlation Coefficients [Computer software]. Available at: http://quantpsy.org. (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynolds, W.M. 1993. “Self Report Methodology.” In Handbook of Child and Adolescent Assessment, edited by T.H. Ollendick and M. Hersen. 98–120. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuman, H. and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. 1999. “Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers.” American Psychologist 54: 93–105. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. 2003. “Self-Reports in Consumer Research: The Challenge of Comparing Cohorts and Cultures.” Journal of Consumer Research 29: 588–594. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/346253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. and J. Bienias. 1990. “What Mediates the Impact of Response Alternatives on Frequency Reports of Mundane Behaviors?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 4: 61–72. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N., H. Bless, F. Strack, G. Klumpp, H. Rittenauer-Schatka, and A. Simons. 1991. “Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the Availability Heuristic.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 195–202. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. and G. Bohner. 2001. “The Construction of Attitudes.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intraindividual Processes, edited by A. Tesser and N. Schwarz. 436–457. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631210344.2002.00022.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. and H.J. Hippler. 1995. “Subsequent Questions May Influence Answers to Preceding Questions in Mail Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59: 93–97. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269460.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N., H.J. Hippler, B. Deutsch, and F. Strack. 1985. “Response Scales: Effects of Category Range on Reported Behavior and Comparative Judgments.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 388–395. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268936.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarz, N. and D. Oyserman. 2001. “Asking Questions About Behavior: Cognition, Communication, and Questionnaire Construction.” American Journal of Evaluation 22: 127–161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, J. 2008. “Children as Respondents: The Challenge for Quantitative Methods.” In Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, edited by P. Christensen and A. James. 87–108. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strack, F. 1992. “‘Order Effects’ in Survey Research: Activation and Information Functions of Preceding Questions.” In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, edited by N. Schwarz and S. Sudman. 23–34. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Strack, F. 1994. Zur Psychologie der standardisierten Befragung: Kognitive und Kommunikative Prozesse. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-78890-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Strack, F. and N. Schwarz. 2007. “Asking Questions: Measurement in the Social Sciences.” In Psychology’s Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines, edited by M. Ash and T. Sturm. 225–250. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. and K.A. Rasinski. 1988. “Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement.” Psychological Bulletin 103: 299–314.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., K.A. Rasinski, N. Bradburn, and R. D’Andrade. 1989. “Carryover Effects in Attitude Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 495–524. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warren, A.R. and P. Lane. 1995. “Effects of Timing and Type of Questioning on Eyewitness Accuracy and Suggestibility.” In Memory and Testimony in the Child Witness, edited by M.S. Zaragoza, J.R. Graham, G.C.N. Hall, R. Hirschman and Y.S. Ben-Porath. 44–60. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar