[Alagna, V., Bagarello, V., Di Prima, S., Iovino, M., 2016. Determining hydraulic properties of a loam soil by alternative infiltrometer techniques. Hydrol. Process., 30, 2, 263–275.10.1002/hyp.10607]Search in Google Scholar
[Bagarello, V., Castellini, M., Di Prima, S., Iovino, M., 2014. Soil hydraulic properties determined by infiltration experiments and different heights of water pouring. Geoderma, 213, 492–501.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.032]Search in Google Scholar
[Beatty, S.M., Smith, J.E., 2013. Dynamic soil water repellency and infiltration in post-wildfire soils. Geoderma 192, 160–172.10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Buczko, U., Bens, O., Fischer, H., Hüttl, R.F., 2002. Water repellency in sandy luvisols under different forest transformation stages in northeast Germany. Geoderma, 109, 1–2, 1–18.10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00137-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Buczko, U., Bens, O., Hüttl, R.F., 2005. Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma, 126, 3–4, 317–336.10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Cerdà, A. 1996. Seasonal variability of infiltration rates under contrasting slope conditions in southeast Spain. Geoderma, 69, 217–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cerdà, A., Doerr, S.H., 2007. Soil wettability, runoff and erodibility of major dry-Mediterranean land use types on calcareous soils. Hydrol. Process., 21, 17, 2325–2336.10.1002/hyp.6755]Search in Google Scholar
[DeBano, L.F., 2000. Water repellency in soils: a historical overview. J. Hydrol., 231–232, 4–32.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00180-3]Search in Google Scholar
[de Jonge, L.W., Jacobsen, O.H., Moldrup, P., 1999. Soil water repellency: effects of water content, temperature, and particle size. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 3, 437–442.10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030003x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil. 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour. Res., 30, 9, 2507–2517.10.1029/94WR00749]Search in Google Scholar
[Doerr, S.H., 1998. On standardizing the ‘Water Drop Penetration Time’ and the ‘Molarity of an Ethanol Droplet’ techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: A case study using medium textured soils. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf., 23, 7, 663–668.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199807)23:7<663::AID-ESP909>3.0.CO;2-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., Walsh, R.P.D., 1996. Soil hydrophobicity variations with depth and particle size fraction in burned and unburned Eucalyptus globulus and Pinus pinaster forest terrain in the Águeda Basin, Portugal. Catena, 27, 1, 25–47.10.1016/0341-8162(96)00007-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., Walsh, R.P.D., 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Sci. Rev., 51, 1–4, 33–65.10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebel, B.A., Moody, J.A., Martin, D.A., 2012. Hydrological conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire. Water Resour. Res., 48, W03529.10.1029/2011WR011470]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J., Goebel, M.-O., 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 1, 57–66.10.2136/sssaj2005.0057]Search in Google Scholar
[Fér, M., Leue, M., Kodešová, R., Gerke, H.H., Ellerbrock, R.H., 2016. Droplet infiltration dynamics and soil wettability related to soil organic matter of soil aggregate coatings and interiors. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 64, 2, 111–120.10.1515/johh-2016-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[García, F.J.M., Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K., Ritsema, C.J., 2005. Water repellency under natural conditions in sandy soils of southern Spain. Soil Research, 43, 3, 291–296.10.1071/SR04089]Search in Google Scholar
[Iovino, M., Castellini, M., Bagarello, V., Giordano, G., 2016. Using static and dynamic indicators to evaluate soil physical quality in a sicilian area. Land Degradation & Development, 27, 2, 200–210.10.1002/ldr.2263]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallett, P.D., Baumgartl, T., Young, I.M., 2001. Subcritical water repellency of aggregates from a range of soil management practices. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 1, 184–190.10.2136/sssaj2001.651184x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallin, I., Douglas, P., Doerr, S.H., Bryant, R., 2013. The role of drop volume and number on soil water repellency determination. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 5, 1732–1743.10.2136/sssaj2013.04.0130]Search in Google Scholar
[Helsel, D.R., Hirsch, R.M., 2002. Statistical methods in water resources. Techniques of Water resources investigations, Book 4, chapter A3. U.S. Geological Survey. 522 p. Publication available at: http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3/]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunter, A.E., Chau, H.W., Si, B.C., 2011. Impact of tension infiltrometer disc size on measured soil water repellency index. Can. J. Soil Sci., 91, 1, 77–81.10.4141/cjss10033]Search in Google Scholar
[Jungerius, P.D., Dejong, J.H., 1989. Variability of water repellence in the dunes along the Dutch coast. Catena, 16, 4–5, 491–497.10.1016/0341-8162(89)90030-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, D.M., Reynolds, W.D., Elrick, D.E., Clothier, B.E., 1985. A comparison of three field methods for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity. Can. J. Soil Sci., 65, 3, 563–573.10.4141/cjss85-060]Search in Google Scholar
[Leue, M., Gerke, H.H., Godow, S.C., 2015. Droplet infiltration and organic matter composition of intact crack and biopore surfaces from clay-illuvial horizons. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 178, 2, 250–260.10.1002/jpln.201400209]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichner, L., Holko, L., Zhukova, N., Schacht, K., Rajkai, K., Fodor, N., Sándor, R., 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 60, 4, 309–318.10.2478/v10098-012-0027-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichner, L., Capuliak, J., Zhukova, N., Holko, L., Czachor, H., Kollar, J., 2013a. Pines influence hydrophysical parameters and water flow in a sandy soil. Biologia, 68, 6, 1104–1108.10.2478/s11756-013-0254-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichner, L., Hallett, P.D., Drongová, Z., Czachor, H., Kovacik, L., Mataix-Solera, J., Homolák, M., 2013b. Algae influence the hydrophysical parameters of a sandy soil. Catena, 108, 58–68.10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Lilliefors, H.W., 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 62, 318, 399–402.10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma'shum, M., Farmer, V., 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Soil Research, 23, 4, 623–626.10.1071/SR9850623]Search in Google Scholar
[McKissock, I., Gilkes, R.J., Harper, R.J., Carter, D.J., 1998. Relationships of water repellency to soil properties for different spatial scales of study. Soil Research, 36, 3, 495–508.10.1071/S97071]Search in Google Scholar
[Moody, D.R., Schlossberg, M.J., 2010. Soil water repellency index prediction using the molarity of ethanol droplet test. Vadose Zone J., 9, 4, 1046–1051.10.2136/vzj2009.0119]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, D.W, Sommers, L.E., 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Book Series, no.5, pt. 3. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 961–1010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nyman, P., Sheridan, G., Lane, P.N.J., 2010. Synergistic effects of water repellency and macropore flow on the hydraulic conductivity of a burned forest soil, south-east Australia. Hydrol. Process., 24, 2871–2887.10.1002/hyp.7701]Search in Google Scholar
[Pekárová, P., Pekár, J., Lichner, L., 2015. A new method for estimating soil water repellency index. Biologia, 70, 11, 1450–1455.10.1515/biolog-2015-0178]Search in Google Scholar
[Philip, J.R., 1957. The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations. Soil Sci., 84, 257–264.10.1097/00010694-195709000-00010]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez-Alleres, M., Benito, E., de Blas, E., 2007. Extent and persistence of water repellency in north-western Spanish soils. Hydrol. Process., 21, 17, 2291–2299.10.1002/hyp.6761]Search in Google Scholar
[Sepehrnia, N., Hajabbasi, M.A., Afyuni, M., Lichner, Ľ., 2016. Extent and persistence of water repellency in two Iranian soils. Biologia, 71, 1137–1143.10.1515/biolog-2016-0135]Search in Google Scholar
[Soil Survey Staff, 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th ed. NRCS, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillman, R.W., Scotter, D.R., Wallis, M.G., Clothier, B.E., 1989. Water-repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity. Aust. J. Soil Res., 27, 4, 637–644.10.1071/SR9890637]Search in Google Scholar
[Tschapek, M., 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, 147, 2, 137–149.10.1002/jpln.19841470202]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandervaere, J.P., Vauclin, M., Elrick, D.E., 2000. Transient flow from tension infiltrometers: II. Four methods to determine sorptivity and conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1272–1284.10.2136/sssaj2000.6441272x]Search in Google Scholar
[Van’t Woudt, B.D., 1959. Particle coatings affecting the wettability of soils. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64, 2, 263–267.10.1029/JZ064i002p00263]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogelmann, E.S., Reichert, J.M., Prevedello, J., Consensa, C.O.B., Oliveira, A.É., Awe, G.O., Mataix-Solera, J., 2013. Threshold water content beyond which hydrophobic soils become hydrophilic: The role of soil texture and organic matter content. Geoderma, 209–210, 177–187.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Warrick, A.W., 1998. Appendix 1: Spatial variability. In: Hillel, D. (Ed.): Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 655–675.10.1016/B978-012348525-0/50026-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, C.L., Letey, J., 1970. Indices for characterizing soil-water repellency based upon contact angle-surface tension relationships. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 34, 6, 841–844.10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400060011x]Search in Google Scholar