[1. T. Anderson, D. Schum, W. Twining, Analysis of Evidence, ed. 2, Cambridge University Press, 2005;10.1017/CBO9780511610585]Search in Google Scholar
[2. L. Baribeau, L’art d’apprécier les témoignages, Journal du Barreau, vol. 37, nr. 2/2005;]Search in Google Scholar
[3. M. Franchimont, A. Jacobs, A. Masset, Manuel de procédure pénale, ed. 2, Larcier, 2006;]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Th. Hoscheit, Chronique de droit judiciaire privé: Les témoins, Pas. t. 32;]Search in Google Scholar
[5. John D. Jackson, Sarah J. Summers, The Internalisation of Criminal Evidence, Cambridge University Press, 2012;]Search in Google Scholar
[6. M.G. Massé, Le Droit Commercial dans ses rapports avec le Droit Des Gens et Le Droit Civil, t. VI, Paris, 1847;]Search in Google Scholar
[7. S. Menétrey, Procédure Civile Luxembourgeoise. Approche comparative, Larcier, 2016;]Search in Google Scholar
[8. D. Mougenot, Droit des Obigations. La preuve, Larcier, 2002, p. 272;]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Pierre Van Ommeslaghe, Traité de Droit Civil Belge. Les obligations, t. II, Bruylant, 2013;]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Roscoe’s Digest of the Law of evidence in Criminal Cases, ed. 5, London, 1861;]Search in Google Scholar
[11. A. Sayed, Corruption in international Trade and Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2004, p. 96;]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Theo. L. De Vinne, The Invention of Printing, New York, 1876;]Search in Google Scholar
[13. A. Watson, Critical Studies in Ancient Law, Comparative Law and Legal History, Hart Publishing, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
