[1. Prazeres CE, Cury RC, Carneiro AC, Rochitte CE. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Assessment of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Room. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2013;101:562-569.10.5935/abc.20130208410681524145392]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Sato Y, Imazeki T, Inoue F, et al. Detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery plaques by multislice computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Report of 2 cases. Circ J. 2004;68:263-266.10.1253/circj.68.263]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Litt H, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1393-1403.10.1056/NEJMoa1201163]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Boden WE, Shah PK, Gupta V, Ohman EM. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;50:311-351.10.1016/j.pcad.2007.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25-e146.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095-2128.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197-2223.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Prazeres CE, Cury RC, Carneiro AC, Rochitte CE. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency room. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2013;101:562-569.10.5935/abc.20130208]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Gilard M, Le Gal G, Cornily JC, et al. Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1686-1689.10.1001/archinte.167.15.168617698693]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:3042-3050.10.1093/eurheartj/ehm46617981829]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2008;94:1386-1393.10.1136/hrt.2008.14529218669550]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:iii-iv,ix-143.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.02817084268]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;245:720-731.10.1148/radiol.245306189917951354]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724-1732.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.03119007693]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-2144.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.05819095130]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. 64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2007;93:1386-1392.10.1136/hrt.2006.112771201688917344332]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006;114:2251-2260.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.63480817075011]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1642-1650.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052274776619406338]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319-326.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.04417659199]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous interventions in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:704-711.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.07121816305]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909-2945.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn41619004841]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Ross MA, O’Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multislice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863-871.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.06417320744]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM. Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1414-1422.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.06821939822]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:299-308.10.1056/NEJMoa1201161366221722830462]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:880-892.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.06123395069]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Frauenfelder T, Appenzeller P, Karlo C, et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:789-799.10.1007/s00330-008-1231-319015860]Search in Google Scholar