Will Total Knee Replacement Ever Provide Normal Knee Function?

1. Pop TS. Elemente de ortopedie, Târgu Mureș: Univesity Press. 2005.Search in Google Scholar

2. Archibeck MJ, Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Glant TT. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:185-195.Search in Google Scholar

3. Messier SP, Loeser RF, Mitchell MN, et al. Exercise and weight loss in obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1062-1072.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04781.x10983905Search in Google Scholar

4. Christensen R, Astrup A, Bliddal H. Weight loss: the treatment of choice for knee osteoarthritis? a randomized trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:20-27.10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.00815639633Search in Google Scholar

5. Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, et al. The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2632-2636.10.1002/art.1053012384921Search in Google Scholar

6. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:339-344.10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.0830339Search in Google Scholar

7. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. Results of the knee replacement patient outcomes research team study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163-173.10.2106/00004623-199802000-000039486722Search in Google Scholar

8. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Eng J Med. 2000;342:1016-1022.10.1056/NEJM20000406342140510749964Search in Google Scholar

9. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:93-110.10.1097/00003086-199811000-000159917673Search in Google Scholar

10. Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:27-31.10.1097/BLO.0b013e318159c5ff17891041Search in Google Scholar

11. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:12-25.10.1097/01.blo.0000148594.05443.a3Search in Google Scholar

12. Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, Davis AM. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:907-918.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.01418687289Search in Google Scholar

13. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35-43.10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1eSearch in Google Scholar

14. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2000;71:262-267.10.1080/000164700317411852Search in Google Scholar

15. Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed-versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1172-1179.10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.21031Search in Google Scholar

16. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:49-64.10.1097/00003086-198801000-00010Search in Google Scholar

17. Deyle GD, Allison SC, Matekel RL, et al. Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther. 2005;85:1301-1317.10.1093/ptj/85.12.1301Search in Google Scholar

18. Heijink A, Gomoll AH, Madry H, et al. Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:423-435.10.1007/s00167-011-1818-0Search in Google Scholar

19. Fabi DW, Mohan V, Goldstein WM, Dunn JH, Murphy BP. Unilateral vs Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Risk Factors Increasing Morbidity. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:668-673.10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.011Search in Google Scholar

20. Luyten FP, Denti M, Filardo G, Kon E, Engebretsen L. Definition and classification of early osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:401-406.10.1007/s00167-011-1743-2Search in Google Scholar

21. Palmer S. Total Knee Arthroplasty. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1250275-overviewSearch in Google Scholar

22. Gill Gs. Joshi AB. Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:209-214.Search in Google Scholar

23. Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS, van der Tweel I, Kimpen JL, Sinnema G. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:653-661.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.013Search in Google Scholar

24. Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:831-840.10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80183-5Search in Google Scholar

25. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740-747.10.1054/arth.2001.2392211547372Search in Google Scholar

26. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57-63.Search in Google Scholar

27. Bellamy N, Lybrand SG, Gee T. (2002) An evaluation of the convergence between three different methods of response status assignment (RSA) based on the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Proceedings of the 66th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

28. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.Search in Google Scholar

29. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:757-768.10.1080/1745367051004534516470427Search in Google Scholar

30. Harato K, Bourne RB, Victor J, Snyder M, Hart J, Ries MD. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the genesis ii prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. The Knee. 2008;15:217-221.10.1016/j.knee.2007.12.00718325770Search in Google Scholar

31. Chaudhary R, Beaupré LA, Johnston DW. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2579-2586.10.2106/JBJS.G.0099519047702Search in Google Scholar

32. Seon JK, Park JK, Shin YJ, Seo HY, Lee KB, Song EK. Comparisons of kinematics and range of motion in high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: Cruciate retaining vs. Substituting designs. Knee Surg Sport Tr A. 2011;19:2016-2022.10.1007/s00167-011-1434-z21331651Search in Google Scholar

33. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;271:1349-1357.10.1001/jama.1994.03510410061034Search in Google Scholar

34. Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:204-210.10.1097/00003086-199202000-00030Search in Google Scholar

35. Schurman DJ, Matityahu A, Goodman SB, et al. Prediction of postoperative knee flexion in Insall-Burstein II total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1998;353:175-184.10.1097/00003086-199808000-000209728172Search in Google Scholar

36. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:950-955.10.1302/0301-620X.75B6.82450908245090Search in Google Scholar

37. Brosseau L, Milne S, Wells G, et al. Efficacy of continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:2251-2264.Search in Google Scholar

38. Postel JM, Thoumie P, Missaoui B, et al. Continuous passive motion compared with intermittent mobilization after total knee arthroplasty. Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007;50:244-257.Search in Google Scholar

39. Pope R, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW. Continuous passive motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Does it offer any benefits? Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2000;37:179-188.Search in Google Scholar