Cite

An arduous debate has developed around the question of whether the multiple IMF’s ‘stabilization’ interventions in developing countries have actually met one of the most important of its initial programmatic goals, i.e., the provision of resources to members, with a view to eliminating temporary Balance of Payments maladjustments, avoiding at the same time destroying ‘national or international prosperity’. More importantly, there have been many voices claiming that these programs have rather accentuated poverty than alleviated it. We explore this claim both theoretically and empirically. Our results show an unequivocal negative relationship between IMF lending and poverty in the developing world.

eISSN:
2344-4150
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, Economic Theory, Systems and Structures, Microeconomics, Macroecomics, other