This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Agee, C. (2007). Improving the peer review process. Healthcare Executive, 22(3), 72–74.17523355AgeeC.2007Improving the peer review processHealthcare Executive2237274Search in Google Scholar
Cainelli, G., Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E., & de Felice, A. (2015). The strength of strong ties: How co-authorship affect productivity of academic economists? Scientometrics, 102(1), 673–699.10.1007/s11192-014-1421-5CainelliG.MaggioniM.A.UbertiT.E.de FeliceA.2015The strength of strong ties: How co-authorship affect productivity of academic economists?Scientometrics1021673699Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dorigo, M., & Blum, C. (2005). Ant colony optimization theory: A survey. Theoretical Computer Science, 344(2), 243–278.10.1016/j.tcs.2005.05.020DorigoM.BlumC.2005Ant colony optimization theory: A surveyTheoretical Computer Science3442243278Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Freville, A. (2004). The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(1), 1–21.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00274-1FrevilleA.2004The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overviewEuropean Journal of Operational Research1551121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gandhi, J., & Sauser, B. (2008). Knowledge networks: How independence and subject matter experts can influence project reviews. Engineering Management Journal, 20(1), 19–28.10.1080/10429247.2008.11431752GandhiJ.SauserB.2008Knowledge networks: How independence and subject matter experts can influence project reviewsEngineering Management Journal2011928Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang, H., & Zhong, X. (2006). The problems and improvement on science projects review (in Chinese). Science and Technology Management Research, 10, 25–26.HuangH.ZhongX.2006The problems and improvement on science projects review (in Chinese)Science and Technology Management Research102526Search in Google Scholar
Ho, S., Sang, H., Kyung, A.K., Eun, J.C., & Keun, H.R. (2017). Proposal reviewer recommendation system based on big data for a national research management institute. Journal of Information Science, 43(2), 147–158.10.1177/0165551516644168HoS.SangH.KyungA.K.EunJ.C.KeunH.R.2017Proposal reviewer recommendation system based on big data for a national research management instituteJournal of Information Science432147158Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Husian, M., Upreti, N., & Gupta, D. (2010). Genetic algorithm: Review and application. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 2(2), 451–454.KumarM.HusianM.UpretiN.GuptaD.2010Genetic algorithm: Review and applicationInternational Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management2245145410.2139/ssrn.3529843Search in Google Scholar
Li, N.N., Zhang, J.N., Gu, J.H., & Liu, B.Y. (2007). Solving expert assignment problem using improved genetic algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (pp. 934–937). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.LiN.N.ZhangJ.N.GuJ.H.LiuB.Y.2007Solving expert assignment problem using improved genetic algorithmIn IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics934937Washington, DCIEEE Computer SocietySearch in Google Scholar
Li, N., Zhao, Z., Gu, J., & Liu, B. (2008). Ant colony optimization algorithm for expert assignment problem. In IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (pp. 660–664). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.LiN.ZhaoZ.GuJ.LiuB.2008Ant colony optimization algorithm for expert assignment problemIn IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics660664Washington, DCIEEE Computer SocietySearch in Google Scholar
Li, J., Peng, J., & Wei, Y. (2013). Adaptive parallel genetic algorithm for expert assignment problem. In the 6th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (pp 23–26). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.LiJ.PengJ.WeiY.2013Adaptive parallel genetic algorithm for expert assignment problemIn the 6th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design2326Washington, DCIEEE Computer SocietySearch in Google Scholar
Martello, S., & Toth, P. (1987). Algorithms for knapsack problems. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 132, 213–257.10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73237-7MartelloS.TothP.1987Algorithms for knapsack problemsNorth-Holland Mathematics Studies132213257Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(1), 60–67.MilgramS.1967The small world problemPsychology Today21606710.1037/e400002009-005Search in Google Scholar
Wang, M. (2007). The selection of science and technology appraisal expert and judgement method for their appraisal behavior. R&D Management, 19(3), 119–122, 129.WangM.2007The selection of science and technology appraisal expert and judgement method for their appraisal behaviorR&D Management193119122129Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Su, J., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2002). Some suggestions on the evaluation and management of National Natural Science Foundation of China (in Chinese). Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 16(3), 185–186.WangQ.SuJ.LiJ.LiuY.2002Some suggestions on the evaluation and management of National Natural Science Foundation of China (in Chinese)Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China163185186Search in Google Scholar
Wu, S. (1996). Peer review methodology. Beijing: Beijing Science Press.WuS.1996Peer review methodologyBeijing: Beijing Science PressSearch in Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Li, Z., Zheng, Z., Xie, H., & Wang, C. (2016). Evaluation of applications for national natural science foundation in 2015: An overview (in Chinese). Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 1, 4–7.ZhangX.LiZ.ZhengZ.XieH.WangC.2016Evaluation of applications for national natural science foundation in 2015: An overview (in Chinese)Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China147Search in Google Scholar
