[1. Lee MS, Bokhoor P, Park SJ, et al. Unprotected left main coronary disease ant ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a contemporary review and argument for percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:791-795.10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.00520723848]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in Patients With De Novo Left Main Disease Treated With Either Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYN-TAX) Trial. Circulation. 2010;121:2645-2653. DOI: 10.1161/CirculationAHA.109.899211.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.89921120530001]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Girasis C, Garg S, Räber L, et al. SYNTAX score and Clinical SYNTAX score as predictors of very long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a substudy of SIRolimus-eluting stent compared with pacliTAXel-eluting stent for coronary revascularization (SINTAX) trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:3115-3127. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr369.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr36921951630]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fernandez-Friera L, Garcia-Alvarez A, Guzman G, Garcia JM. Coronary CT and the Coronary Calcium Score, the Future of ED Risk Stratification? Current Cardiology Rev. 2012 May;8:82-97.10.2174/157340312801784989340627722708911]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Polonsky TS, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Risk Classification for Coronary Heart Disease Prediction. JAMA. 2010;303:1610-1616.10.1001/jama.2010.461303374120424251]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Gagnor A, Tomassini F, Romagnoli E, et al. Percutaneous left main coronary disease treatment without on-site surgery back-up in patients with acute coronary syndromes: immediate and 2 year outcomes. Catheter Cardiovascular Interv. 2012;799:79-87.10.1002/ccd.2322521735530]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lee MS, Sillano D, Latib A, et al. Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovascular Interv. 2009;73:15-21.10.1002/ccd.2171219089930]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Claver E, Curos A, Lopez-Ayerbe J, et al. Clinical predictors of left main coronary artery disease in higk risk patients with a first episodes of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiologie. 2006;59:794-800.10.1157/13091883]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Winj W, Kohl P. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)ant the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developped with the special contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2501-2505.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Ayca B, Akin F, Celik O, et al. Does SYNTAX score predict in-hospital outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Kardiologia Polska. 2014;72,9:806-813. DOI 10.5603.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Sahn DY, Gur M, Elbasam Z, et al. SYNTAX score is a predictor of angiographic no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Disease. 2013;24:148-153.10.1097/MCA.0b013e32835c471923363986]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Brkovic V, Dobric M, Giga V, et al. Additive prognostic value of the SYNTAX scre over GRACE, TIMI, ZWOLLE, CADILLAC and PAMI risk scores in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary interventions. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2013;29:1215-1228.10.1007/s10554-013-0202-123443340]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Sadowski M, gutkowski W, Janion-Sadowska A, Gasior M, Gierlotka M, Janion M, Polonski L. Acute myocardial infacrtion due to left main coronary artery disease: A large multicenter national registry. Cardiology Journal 2003:20 190-196.10.5603/CJ.2013.003323558878]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Karabulut A, Cakmak M. Treatment stretegies in the left main coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndromes. J Saudi Heart Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.002 (article in press)]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Benedek T, Gyongyosi M, Benedek I. Multi-slice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angi-ography for Quantitative Assessment of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Sun Z, Cao Y. Multislice CT angi-ography assessment of left coronary artery: correlation between bifurcation angle and dimensions and development of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79:e90-95.10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.01521543178]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Sim DS, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, et al. Clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Interventional Heart Journal. 2013;54(4):185-191.10.1536/ihj.54.18523924928]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Pappalado A, Mamas MA, Imola F, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease as culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention. 2011;4:618-626.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.01621700247]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Puricel s, Adorjan P, Oberhansli M, et al. Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study. Eurointervention. 2011;7:697-704.10.4244/EIJV7I6A11221986328]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Vis MM, Beijk MA, Grundeken MJ, et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis on primary percutaneous coronary intervention of an unprotected left main coronary artery culprit lesion in a setting of acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention. 2013;6:317-324.10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.02023597607]Search in Google Scholar