1. bookVolumen 6 (2013): Edición 1 (September 2013)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1313-9053
Primera edición
08 Sep 2014
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Comparison of Four Methods for Corneal Thickness Measurement

Publicado en línea: 30 Nov 2016
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 6 (2013) - Edición 1 (September 2013)
Páginas: 37 - 42
Recibido: 21 Nov 2012
Aceptado: 26 Jun 2013
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1313-9053
Primera edición
08 Sep 2014
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

1. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken- Dror G, Avni I, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;3 (9): 729-35.10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058Search in Google Scholar

2. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5):367-408.10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7Search in Google Scholar

3. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 20(6):7 4- 20.10.1001/archopht.120.6.714Search in Google Scholar

4. Wheeler NC, Morantes CM, Kristensen RM, Pettit TH, Lee DA. Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters. Am J Ophthalmol. 992; 3(6):645-5 .10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74788-9Search in Google Scholar

5. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol. 2008 ;28(5):333-8.10.1007/s10792-007-9143-9Search in Google Scholar

6. Taylor JR. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. 2nd ed. Sausalito, Calif. USA: University ScienceBooks; 997. p. 5-55.Search in Google Scholar

7. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 ;43(6): 79 -5.Search in Google Scholar

8. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Huang D, Schuman JS, et al. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 994; 2( 2): 584-9.Search in Google Scholar

9. Piotrowiak I, Soldanska B, Burduk M, Kaluzny B, Kaluzny J. Measuring Corneal Thickness with SOCT, the Scheimpflug System, and Ultrasound Pachymetry. ISRN Ophthalmology Volume 20 2 (20 2), Article ID 8693 9, 5 pages doi: 0.5402/20 2/8693 9.Search in Google Scholar

10. M. Shaheeda, Lee GKY, Rao SKR, Wong AL, Cheng AC, Li EY, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante Anterior Segment-Optical Coherence Tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48( 2): 5499-504.10.1167/iovs.07-0591Search in Google Scholar

11. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach. Surv of Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5): 367-408.10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7Search in Google Scholar

12. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 35(2): 3 -7.10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01886-XSearch in Google Scholar

13. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, Mandelli G, Gomarasca S, Orzalesi N. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(2): 74-7.10.1136/bjo.2003.023416177201414736765Search in Google Scholar

14. Kitsos G, Gartzios C, Asproudis I, Bagli E. Central corneal thickness in subjects with glaucoma and in normal individuals (with or without pseudoexfoliation syndrome). Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3( ): 537-42.10.2147/OPTH.S6484Search in Google Scholar

15. Cairns G, McGhee CNJ. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 3 ( ):205-20.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.047Search in Google Scholar

16. Iskander NG, Anderson Penno E, Peters NT, Gimbel HV, Ferensowicz M. Accuracy ofOrbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 200 ;27(5):68 -5.10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00820-3Search in Google Scholar

17. Chakrabarti HS, Craig JP, Brahma A, Malik TY, McGhee CNJ. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbs can slit¬scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 200 ; 27( ): 823- 8.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, Banerjee S, Naroo SA, Shah S. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(6): 272-7.10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.049Search in Google Scholar

19. Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, Drexler W, Findl O. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 4 ( ):7- 2.10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.048Search in Google Scholar

20. Geggel HS, Talley AR. Delayed onset keratectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 999;25(4):582-6.10.1016/S0886-3350(99)80060-1Search in Google Scholar

21. Lattimore MR Jr, Kaupp S, Schallhom S, Lewis R IV. Oibscan pachymetry; implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology. 999; 06(5):977-8 .10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00519-9Search in Google Scholar

22. Bourne WM, McLaren JW. Clinical responses of the corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78(3):56 -72.Search in Google Scholar

23. Maurice DM, Giardini AA. A simple optical apparatus for measuring the corneal thickness, and the average thickness of the human cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 20 2; 35(3): 69-77.10.1136/bjo.35.3.169132370814821293Search in Google Scholar

24. Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Oibscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33( 0): 70 -7.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.04017889763Search in Google Scholar

25. Bouiges JL, Alfonsi N, Lalibeit JF, Chagnon M, Renard G, Legeais J-M, et al. Average 3- dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Ophthalmology. 2009; 6( ):2064-7 .10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.03619744719Search in Google Scholar

26. Jahadi HR, Katbab A, Khalili MR, Abtahi MB. Comparison of comeal thickness measurements using Galilei. Cornea 20 0;29( 0): 09 -5.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ho T, Cheng ACK, Rao SK, Lau S, Leung CKS, Lam DSC. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Suig. 2007;33(7): 77-82.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028Search in Google Scholar

28. Tam ES and Rootman DS. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound bio microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(6): 79-84.10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01921-1Search in Google Scholar

29. Wong ACM, Wong CC, Yuen NSY, Hui SP. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye (Lond). 2002; 6(6):7 5-2 .10.1038/sj.eye.670021112439665Search in Google Scholar

30. Jalbert I, Stapleton F, Papas E, Sweeney DF, CoroneoM. In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(2):225- 36.10.1136/bjo.87.2.225177151612543757Search in Google Scholar

31. Li HF,PetrollWM,Moller-PedersenT,Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and comeal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 997; 6(3 ):2 4-2 .Search in Google Scholar

32. Jalbert I, Papas E, Sweeney DF, Stapleton F. Instrument, diurnal, and day to day repeatability of in vivo measurements of the central human cornea using slit scanning confocal microscopy and modified optical pachometiy. Invest Ophthalmol VisSci. 2002;43:E-Abstract 7 3.Search in Google Scholar

33. Vesaluoma M, Perez-Santonja J, Petroll WM, Linna T, Alio J, Tervo T. Corneal stromal changes induced by myopic LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2000;4 (2):369-76.Search in Google Scholar

34. Stave J, Slowik C, Somodi S, et al. Keratocyte density in the in vivo cornea. Automatic quantification with a modified confocal microscope MICROPHTHAL. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 998;2 3:38-44. Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo