Acceso abierto

Grammatical Change Trends in Contemporary Czech Newspapers

   | 24 ene 2018

Cite

[1] Baker, P. (2009). The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3):312–337.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bakSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Bartoň, T., Cvrček, V., Čermák, F., Jelínek, T., and Petkevič, V. (2009). Statistiky češtiny. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, Praha.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Duguid, A. (2010). Newspaper discourse informalisation: a diachronic comparison from keywords. Corpora, 5(2):109–138.10.3366/cor.2010.0102Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hajič, J. (2004). Disambiguation of Rich Inflection (Computational Morphology of Czech). Karolinum, Praha.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Herman, O. and Kovář, V. (2013). Methods for Detection of Word Usage over Time. In Seventh Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2013, pages 79–85, Tribun EU, Brno, Czech Republic.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hilpert, M. and Gries, S. T. (2009). Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(4):385–401.10.1093/llc/fqn012Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hnátková, M. et al. (2014). The SYN-series corpora of written Czech. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014, pages 160–164, ELRA, Reykjavík, Iceland.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hundt, M. and Mair, C. (1999). ’Agile’ and ’Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4(2):221–242.10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hunSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Křen, M. (2013). Odraz jazykových změn v synchronních korpusech. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, Praha.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Křen, M. et al. (2016). SYN2015: Representative Corpus of Contemporary Written Czech. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016, pages 2522–2528, ELRA, Portorož, Slovenia.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Křen, M. et al. (2016). SYN corpus, version 4 from 16. 9. 2016. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. Accessible at: http://www.korpus.cz.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Leech, G. (2004). Recent grammatical change in English: Data, description, theory. In Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), pages 61–81, Rodopi, Amsterdam, Netherlands.10.1163/9789004333710_005Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mair, C., Hundt, M., Leech, G., and Smith, N. (2002). Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: A comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2):245–264.10.1075/ijcl.7.2.05maiSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Millar, N. (2009). “Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2):191–220.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03milSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Rychlý, P. (2007). Manatee/Bonito – A Modular Corpus Manager. In First Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2007, pages 65–70, Brno, Czech Republic.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-4287
ISSN:
0021-5597
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Linguistics and Semiotics, Theoretical Frameworks and Disciplines, Linguistics, other