[Adams, D. C., Slice, D. E., & Rolf, F. J. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16.10.1080/11250000409356545]Search in Google Scholar
[Ascher, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2015). Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Available at: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baylac, M., Villemant, C., & Simbolotti, G. (2003). Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80(1), 89–98. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00221.x10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00221.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohart, G. E. (1972). Management of wild bees for the pollination of crops. Annual Review of Entomology, 17, 287–312.10.1146/annurev.en.17.010172.001443]Search in Google Scholar
[Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 435 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, M. T., & Wicker, L. R. (2000). Discriminant analysis. In: Tinsley H. E. A. Brown S. D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Academic Press, San Diego, California: 209–235.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Meulemeester, T., Michez, D., Aytekin, A. M., Danforth, B. N. (2012). Taxonomic affinity of halictid bee fossils (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) based on geometric morphometrics analyses of wing shape. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 10(4), 755-764. DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2011.62870110.1080/14772019.2011.628701]Search in Google Scholar
[Dolati, L., Nazemi Rafie, J., & Khalesro, H. (2013). Landmark-based morphometric study in the fore and hind wings of an Iranian race of European honeybee (Apis mellifera meda). Journal of Apicultural Science, 57 (2), 187-197. DOI: 10.2478/jas-2013-002810.2478/jas-2013-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[Eardley, C., Roth, D., Clarke, J., Buchmann, S., Gemmill. B. (Eds). (2006). Pollinators and pollination: A resource book for policy and practice. African Pollinator Initiative. Pretoria. 77 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Francoy, T. M., Franco, F. F., & Roubik, D. W. (2012). Integrated landmark and outline-ased morphometric methods efficiently distinguish species of Euglossa (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini). Apidologie, 43, 609–617. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-012-0132-210.1007/s13592-012-0132-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Francoy, T. M., Silva, R. A. O., Nunes-Silva, P., Menezes, C., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L. (2009). Gender identification of five genera of stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini) based on wing morphology. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8, 207–214.10.4238/vol8-1gmr557]Search in Google Scholar
[Gemmill-Herren, B., Aidoo, K., Kwapong, P., Martins, D., Kinuthia, W., Gikungu, M., Eardley, C. (2014). Priorities for research and development in the management of pollination services for agriculture in Africa. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 12(6), 40-51.10.26786/1920-7603(2014)1]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerula, D., Tofilski, A., Wegrzynowicz, P., Skowronek, W. (2009). Computer-assisted discrimination of honey bee subspecies used for breeding in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 53 (2), 105-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez, V. H. (2008). Phylogeny and classification of the bee tribe Megachilini (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Megachilidae), with emphasis on the genus Megachile. PhD Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 274 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Güler, Y., Aytekin, A. M., & Cagatay, N. (2006). Systematical studies on Anthidiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) geometric morphometric approach. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 49(3), 474-483.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan P. D. (2001). PAST Version 2.17: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kandemir, İ., Moradi, M. G., Özden, B., Özkan, A. (2009). Wing geometry as a tool for studying the population structure of dwarf honeybees (Apis florea Fabricius 1876) in Iran. Journal of Apicultural Research, 48(4), 238-246. DOI: 10.3896/IBRA.1.48.4.0310.3896/IBRA.1.48.4.03]Search in Google Scholar
[Klingenberg, C. P. (2011). MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 353–357. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x21429143]Search in Google Scholar
[Mac Leod, N. (2001). Landmarks, localization, and the use of morphometrics in phylogenetic analysis. In: Edgecombe, G., Adrain, J., Lieberman, B. (Eds.), Fossils, phylogeny, and form: an analytical approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York: 197-233.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michener, C. D. (2007). The bees of the world, second edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. xvi+[i]+953 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L., Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42, 150-161. DOI: 10.1051/apido/201004810.1051/apido/2010048]Search in Google Scholar
[Nazemi Rafie, J., Mohamadi, R., & Teimory, H. (2014). Comparison of two morphometrics methods for discriminating of honey bee (Apis mellifera meda Sk.) populations in Iran. International Journal of Zoology and Research, 4, 61-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oleska, A., & Tofilski, A. (2014). Wing geometric morphometrics and microsatellite analysis provide similar discrimination of honey bee subspecies. Apidologie, 46(1):49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0300-710.1007/s13592-014-0300-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlinov, I. Y. (2001). Geometric morphometrics, a new analytical approach to comparison of digitized images. Zoological Journal of Moscow, 79, 1-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pitts-Singer, T. L., & Cane, J. H. (2011). The alfalfa leaf-cutting bee, Megachile rotundata: the world’s most intensively managed solitary bee. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 221–237. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-14483610.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144836]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohlf, F. J. (2010). tpsDIG, Version 2.16. A program for digitizing landmarks and outlines for geometric morphometrics. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheffield, C. S., Ratti, C., Packer, L., Griswold, T. (2011). Leafcutter and mason bees of the genus Megachile Latreille (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Canada and Alaska. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 18, 1–107. DOI: 10.3752/cjai.2011.1810.3752/cjai.2011.18]Search in Google Scholar
[StatSoft Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tofilski, A. (2008). Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie, 39(5), 558-563. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200803710.1051/apido:2008037]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, N. M., & Goodell, K. (2000). Association of mandible shape and nesting material in Osmia Panzer (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): A morphometric analysis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93(2), 318-325.10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0318:AOMSAN]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar