From Distributional Semantics to Conceptual Spaces: A Novel Computational Method for Concept Creation

Allott, N., and Textor, M. 2012. Lexical Pragmatic Adjustment and the Nature of Ad Hoc Concepts. International Review of Pragmatics 4(2).10.1163/18773109-00040204Search in Google Scholar

Arora, S.; Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Ma, T.; and Risteski, A. 2015. Random Walks on Context Spaces: Towards an Explanation of the Mysteries of Semantic Word Embeddings. CoRR abs/1502.03520.Search in Google Scholar

Baroni, M., and Lenci, A. 2010. Distributional Memory: A General Framework for Corpus Based Semantics. Computational Linguistics 36(4):673–721.10.1162/coli_a_00016Search in Google Scholar

Baroni, M.; Dinu, G.; and Kruszewski, G. 2014. Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 238–247. Baltimore, Maryland: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/v1/P14-1023Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. 1993. Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of Compositional System of Perceptual Symbols. In Collins, A. F.; Gathercole, S. E.; Conway, M. A.; and Morris, P. E., eds., Theories of Memory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 29–101.Search in Google Scholar

Bengio, Y.; Ducharme, R.; Vincent, P.; and Jauvin, C. 2003. A Neural Probabilistic Language Model. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:1137–1155.Search in Google Scholar

Blei, D. M.; Ng, A. Y.; and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993–1022.Search in Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. 1990. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P. F.; deSouza, P. V.; Mercer, R. L.; Della Pietra, V. J.; and Lai, J. C. 1992. Class-Based n-gram Models of Natural Language. Computational Linguistics 18(4):467–479.Search in Google Scholar

Carston, R. 2010. Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22(1):153–180.Search in Google Scholar

Cimiano, P.; Staab, S.; and Tane, J. 2003. Automatic acquisition of taxonomies from text: FCA meets NLP. In In Proceedings of ECML/PKDD Workshop on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A. 2006. Language, Embodiment, and the Cognitive Niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(8).10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012Search in Google Scholar

Clark, S. 2015. Vector Space Models of Lexical Meaning. In Lappin, S., and Fox, C., eds., The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118882139.ch16Search in Google Scholar

Collobert, R., and Weston, J. 2008. A Unified Architecture for Natural Language Processing: Deep Neural Networks with Multitask Learning. In Proceedings of the 25 th International Conference on Machine Learning.10.1145/1390156.1390177Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, volume 47, 5–20.Search in Google Scholar

Deerwester, S.; Dumais, S. T.; Furnas, G. W.; Landauer, T. K.; and Harshman, R. 1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Jounal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6):391–407.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(4):133–187.10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1Search in Google Scholar

Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. 2000. Conceptual Space: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Miffline.Search in Google Scholar

Grefenstette, E., and Sadrzadeh, M. 2011. Experimental Support for a Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Z. 1957. Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure. Language 33(3):283–340.10.2307/411155Search in Google Scholar

Hassan, S., and Mihalcea, R. 2011. Semantic Relatedness Using Salient Semantic Analysis. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7971Search in Google Scholar

Hill, F.; Korhonen, A.; and Bentz, C. 2014. A Quantitative Empirical Analysis of the Abstract/Concrete Distinction. Cognitive Science 38:162–177.10.1111/cogs.1207623941240Search in Google Scholar

Huang, E. H.; Socher, R.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2012. Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume Long Papers: Volume 1, 873–882.Search in Google Scholar

Kanejiya, D.; Kumar, A.; and Prasad, S. 2003. Automatic Evaluation of Students Answers using Syntactically Enhanced LSA. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 03 workshop on Building educational applications using natural language processing, 53–60.Search in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. 1964. The Act of Creation. London, UK: Hutchinson.Search in Google Scholar

Lapesa, G., and Evert, S. 2013. Evaluating Neighbor Rank and Distance Measures as Predictors of Semantic Priming. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, O.; Goldberg, Y.; and Dagan, I. 2015. Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 3.10.1162/tacl_a_00134Search in Google Scholar

Lund, K., and Burgess, K. 1996. Producing High-Dimensional Semantic Spaces from Lexical Co-Occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28(2):203–208.10.3758/BF03204766Search in Google Scholar

Manning, C., and Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; and Dean, J. 2013. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. In Proceedings of ICLR Workshop.Search in Google Scholar

Mikolov, T.; Yih, W.-T.; and Zweig, G. 2013. Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 246–251.Search in Google Scholar

Milajevs, D.; Kartsaklis, D.; Sadrzadeh, M.; and Purver, M. 2014. Evaluating Neural Word Representations in Tensor-Based Compositional Settings. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 708–719. Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/v1/D14-1079Search in Google Scholar

Moffat, D., and Kelly, M. 2006. An investigation into people’s bias against computational creativity in music composition. In Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity.Search in Google Scholar

Padó, S., and Lapata, M. 2007. Dependency-Based Construction of Semantic Space Models. Computational Linguistics 33(2):161–199.10.1162/coli.2007.33.2.161Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, M. T.; Müllensiefen, D.; and Wiggins, G. A. 2010. The role of expectation and probabilistic learning in auditory boundary perception: A model comparison. Perception 39(10):1367–1391.10.1068/p650721180358Search in Google Scholar

Pennington, J.; Socher, R.; and Manning, C. D. 2014. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.10.3115/v1/D14-1162Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17(1):67–99.10.1007/s11023-007-9066-2Search in Google Scholar

Rychlý, P., and Kilgarriff, A. 2007. An efficient algorithm for building a distributional thesaurus (and other Sketch Engine developments). In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions, 41–44. Prague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1557769.1557783Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, H. 1992. Dimensions of Meaning. In Proc. ACM/IEEE Conference, 787–796.Search in Google Scholar

Snow, R.; Jurafsky, D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2006. Semantic Taxonomy Induction from Heterogenous Evidence. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 801–808. Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1220175.1220276Search in Google Scholar

Socher, R.; Huval, B.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2012. Semantic Compositionality Through Recursive Matrix-vector Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL ’12, 1201–1211. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Turney, P. D., and Pantel, P. 2010. From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (37):141–188.10.1613/jair.2934Search in Google Scholar

Widdows, D. 2004. Geometry and Meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, G. A. 2006. A Preliminary Framework for Description, Analysis and Comparison of Creative Systems. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems 19(7):449–458.10.1016/j.knosys.2006.04.009Search in Google Scholar

Yogatama, D.; Faruqui, M.; Dyer, C.; and Smith, N. A. 2015. Learning Word Representations with Hierarchical Sparse Coding. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning.Search in Google Scholar