Assessing the maximum limit of SAR-OSL dating using quartz of different grain sizes

Anechitei-Deacu, Valentina; Timar-Gabor, Alida; Constantin, Daniela; Trandafir-Antohi, Oana; Valle, Laura Del; Fornós, Joan J; Gómez-pujol, Lluís; Wintle, Ann G.

Acceso abierto

Assessing the maximum limit of SAR-OSL dating using quartz of different grain sizes

Valentina Anechitei-Deacu

Anechitei-Deacu, Valentina

,

,

,

Oana Trandafir-Antohi

Trandafir-Antohi, Oana

,

,

,

y

11 ago 2018

Volumen 45 (2018): Edición 1 (Enero 2018)

Acerca de este artículo

Artículo anterior

Artículo siguiente

Cite

Descargar portada

Categoría del artículo: Regular Articles

Publicado en línea: 11 ago 2018

Páginas: 146 - 159

Recibido: 08 ene 2018

Aceptado: 20 abr 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0092

Palabras clave
quartz, SAR-OSL, aeolianites, dose response, saturation characteristics, accuracy

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Location of aeolianites (shown in red) that outcrop on the coast of Eivissa, Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean (inset).

Simplified stratigraphic log from Cala Bassa showing structural units and location of samples (stars) for OSL measurements. Each OSL age is the weighted average obtained for the fine and coarse quartz fractions.

Representative SAR dose response curves and decay curves for fine and coarse quartz. (a) SAR dose response curve for an aliquot of 4–11 μm quartz extracted from sample M#6# and test results. Inset shows a typical normalised natural OSL signal and response to 250, 1000 and 2000 Gy compared with that for calibration quartz in response to 4.81 Gy. (b) Same data for an aliquot of 63–90 μm quartz extracted from sample M#6#. The error bars often fall within the data point on the graph.

SAR dose response curves for doses up to 2000 Gy for aliquots of 4–11, 63–90, 90–125, 125–180 and 180–250 μm quartz extracted from sample M#6#. The inset shows an enlargement for the dose region up to 500 Gy. The number of aliquots used for each fraction and the equations used to fit the curves are also indicated.

Average SAR dose response curve for doses up to 6000 Gy for 3 aliquots of 4–11 μm from M#6#.

Saturation characteristics (D01, D02) obtained from the data in Fig. 5, calculated when using increasingly high doses.

Average (n=3) SAR dose-response curves constructed after giving 1500 Gy in addition to the natural dose. (a) Data for 4–11 μm grains from sample M#6#. (b) Same data for 63–90 μm grains from sample M#6#. The sensitivity corrected signal related to the natural plus 1500 Gy dose is shown as a horizontal line projected onto the dose response curve.

Average Ln∗/Tn∗ plotted as a function of equivalent dose + laboratory dose, average Lr/Tr measured after one bleach as in dose recovery test and average Lx/Tx measured in a SAR sequence. (a) Data for 4–11 μm quartz from sample M#6#. (b) Same data for 63–90 μm quartz from sample M#11#. Each measurement on fine quartz is the average of three to thirteen aliquots, whereas for the coarse fraction between three and seven aliquots have been used for measurements. The dose response curves were fitted using the sum of two saturating exponential functions. Inset in Fig. 9a presents the same data but enlarged for the low dose region.

The (Ln/Tn)/(Lx/Tx) and (Lr/Tr)/(Lx/Tx) ratios as a function of dose obtained using the data in Fig. 8 and Table S4. (a) Data for 4–11 μm quartz from sample M#6#. (b) Data for 63–90 μm quartz from sample M#11#.

SAR dose-response curves constructed for (a) fine and (b) coarse grains from sample XF 153 after adding 7715 Gy and 4676 Gy, respectively, in addition to the natural dose. These results were obtained using one aliquot for each quartz fraction. The sensitivity corrected signal corresponding to the sum of natural and added dose is interpolated on the constructed dose response curve.

Average Ln∗/Tn∗ values plotted as a function of equivalent dose + laboratory dose, average Lr/Tr measured after one bleach as in dose recovery and average Lx/Tx values measured in a SAR sequence. (a) Data for 4–11 μm quartz from sample XF 153. (b) Same data for 63–90 μm quartz from sample XF 153. For both fine and coarse quartz, between two and four aliquots were used for measurements. The dose response curves were fitted using the sum of two saturating exponential functions.

The ratios (Ln/Tn)/(Lx/Tx) and (Lr/Tr)/(Lx/Tx) as a function of dose obtained using the data in Fig. 11 and Tables S6 and S7. (a) Data for 4–11 μm quartz from sample XF 153. (b) Same data for coarse grains from sample XF 153.

Equivalent doses (De), dosimetry measurements and OSL ages_ The luminescence and dosimetry data are indicated along with the random uncertainties; the uncertainties mentioned with the OSL ages are the overall uncertainties_ All the errors correspond to 1σ_

Sample code	Grain size (μm)	Water content (%)	D_e (Gy)	U-Ra (Bq/kg)	Th (Bq/kg)	K (Bq/kg)	Total random error (%)	Total systematic error (%)	Total dose rate (Gy/ka)	Age (ka)	Weighted average age (ka)
M#11#	4–11	4	133 ± 2 n=8	16.2 ± 0.7	2.0 ± 0.6	19.3 ± 3.5	3.4	9.8	0.73 ± 0.02	183 ± 19	172 ± 12
	63–90		107 ± 4 n=8				4.8	6.1	0.61 ± 0.02	177 ± 14
	90–125		103 ± 5 n=11				5.7	6.2	0.60 ± 0.02	173 ± 15
	125–180		107 ± 6 n=10				6.4	6.2	0.60 ± 0.02	180 ± 16
	180–250		91 ± 5 n=11				6.3	6.2	0.59 ± 0.02	155 ± 14
M#6#	4–11	4	175 ± 2 n=8	16.0 ± 0.6	2.0 ± 0.5	54.9 ± 3.0	2.6	8.9	0.80 ± 0.02	220 ± 20	236 ± 15
	63–90		16.5 ± 0.2				3.3	5.6	0.67 ± 0.01	247 ± 16
	90–125		155 ± 9 n=9				6.2	5.6	0.66 ± 0.01	237 ± 20
	125–180		175 ± 7 n=10				4.6	5.6	0.65 ± 0.01	270 ± 20
	180–250		137 ± 6 n=8				4.9	5.6	0.65 ± 0.01	212 ± 16
M#9#	4–11	2	179 ± 2 n=8	16.5 ± 0.2	2.7 ± 0.5	24.2 ± 3.1	2.4	10.0	0.73 ± 0.02	244 ± 25	251 ± 16
	63–90		139 ± 6 n=12				4.8	5.5	0.60 ± 0.01	233 ± 17
	90–125		146 ± 5n=10				4.1	5.5	0.59 ± 0.01	249 ± 17
	125–180		148 ± 5 n=10				4.0	5.6	0.58 ± 0.01	254 ± 17
	180–250		161 ± 7 n=10				4.9	5.6	0.58 ± 0.01	278 ± 21

Idioma:: Inglés

Calendario de la edición:: 1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:: Geociencias, Geociencias, otros

RSS Feed de revista

Assessing the maximum limit of SAR-OSL dating using quartz of different grain sizes

Categoría del artículo: Regular Articles

Publicado en línea: 11 ago 2018

Páginas: 146 - 159

Recibido: 08 ene 2018

Aceptado: 20 abr 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0092

Palabras clave
quartz, SAR-OSL, aeolianites, dose response, saturation characteristics, accuracy

© 2018 V. Anechitei-Deacu., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Equivalent doses (De), dosimetry measurements and OSL ages_ The luminescence and dosimetry data are indicated along with the random uncertainties; the uncertainties mentioned with the OSL ages are the overall uncertainties_ All the errors correspond to 1σ_

Assessing the maximum limit of SAR-OSL dating using quartz of different grain sizes

Valentina Anechitei-Deacu

Alida Timar-Gabor

Daniela Constantin

Oana Trandafir-Antohi

Laura Del Valle

Joan J Fornós

Lluís Gómez-pujol

Ann G. Wintle

Categoría del artículo: Regular Articles

Publicado en línea: 11 ago 2018

Páginas: 146 - 159

Recibido: 08 ene 2018

Aceptado: 20 abr 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0092

Palabras clavequartz, SAR-OSL, aeolianites, dose response, saturation characteristics, accuracy

© 2018 V. Anechitei-Deacu., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Equivalent doses (De), dosimetry measurements and OSL ages_ The luminescence and dosimetry data are indicated along with the random uncertainties; the uncertainties mentioned with the OSL ages are the overall uncertainties_ All the errors correspond to 1σ_

Palabras clave
quartz, SAR-OSL, aeolianites, dose response, saturation characteristics, accuracy