[Baumanis I., Birģelis J., Paegle M. 1992. How promising for Latvia is lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm.). Mežzinātne, 1, 4–14 (in Latvian with English abstract).]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumanis I., Jansons Ā., Gaile A. 2006. Inventorying and creating a database for long-term trial plots in forest research. Mežzinātne, 16, 102–112 (in Latvian with English abstract).]Search in Google Scholar
[Białobok S. 1975. Scots pine – Pinus sylvestris L. Foreign Service Publications Department, Washington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burton L. 2012. Introduction to forestry science, 3rd edition. Cengage Learning, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bušs K. 1976. Basis of Forest classification in Latvia SSR. LRZTIPI, Rīga (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cieszewski C.J., Bella I.E. 1989. Polymorphic height and site index curves for lodgepole pine in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 1151–1160.10.1139/x89-174]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Elfving B., Ericsson T., Rosvall O. 2001. The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden—a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 141, 15–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elfving B., Norgren O. 1993. Volume yield superiority of lodgepole pine compared to Scots pine in Sweden. In: Proceedings of IUFRO meeting and Frans Kempe Symposium 1992 on Pinus contorta provenances and breeding, 69–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallagher G.J., Lynch T.J., Fitzsimons B. 1987. Lodgepole pine in the Republic of Ireland II. Yield and management of coastal lodgepole pine. Forest Ecology and Management, 22, 185–203.10.1016/0378-1127(87)90104-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Honda H., Fisher B. 1978. Tree branch angle: maximizing effective leaf area. Science, 199, 888–890.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jansons A., Matisons R., Lībiete-Zālīte Z., Baders E., Rieksts-Riekstiņš J. 2013. Relationships of height growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) with climatic factors in Zvirgzde, Latvia. Baltic Forestry, 19, 236–244.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jansons A., Sisenis L., Neimane U., Rieksts-Riekstins J. 2013. Biomass production of young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) stands in Latvia. Forest, 6, 10–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kärkkäinen L., Matala J., Härkönen K., Kellomäki S., Nuutinen S. 2008. Potential recovery of industrial wood and energy wood raw material in different cutting and climate scenarios for Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32, 934–943.10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Koch P. 1996. Lodgepole pine in North America. Forest Products Society, Washington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsen J.B. 1980. Older provenance trials with Pinus contorta in Denmark. Pinus contorta as an Exotic Species. In: Proceedings of IUFRO meeting 1980 on Pinus contorta provenances in Norway and Sweden, 45–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindelöw A., Björkman C. 2001. Insects on lodgepole pine in Sweden—current knowledge and potential risks. Forest Ecology and Management, 141, 107–116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lines R. 1996. Experiments on lodgepole pine seed origins in Britain. Technical paper 10. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mäkinen H., Colin F. 1998. Predicting branch angle and branch diameter of Scots pine from usual tree measurements and stand structural information. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 1686–1696.10.1139/x98-141]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mauriņš A., Zvirgzds A. 2006. Dendrology. Latvijas Universitātes apgāds, Rīga (in Latvian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchi P.R., O’Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H., Wagner H. 2013. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson A. 1993. Wood properties of Pinus contorta. In: Proceedings of IUFRO meeting and Frans Kempe Symposium 1992 on Pinus contorta provenances and breeding, 38–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pfister R.D., Daubenmire R. 1975. Ecology of Lodgepole pine Pinus contorta Dougl. In: Management of lodgepole pine ecosystems (ed.: D.M. Baumgartner). Washington State University, Pullman, 27–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.Rproject.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sable I., Grinfelds U., Jansons A., Vikele L., Irbe I., Verovkins A., Treimanis A. 2012. Comparison of the properties of wood and pulp fibbers from lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). BioResources, 7, 1771–1783.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauter U.H. 1997. Potential of small dimensioned, low quality round wood of Scots pine for the production of valuable timber. In: Role of wood production in ecosystem management. Proc. of the Sustainable Forestry Working Group at the IUFRO (eds.: R.J. Barbour, K.E. Skog), 59–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savill P., Evans J., Auclair D., Falck J. 1997. Plantation silviculture in Europe. Oxford University Press, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shmulsky R., Jones P.D. 2011. Forest products and wood science. John Wiley and Sons, New York.10.1002/9780470960035]Search in Google Scholar
[Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. Freeman and Company, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiskittel A.R., Kershaw J.A., Hofmeyer P.V., Seymour R.S. 2009. Species differences in total and vertical distribution of branch- and tree-level leaf area for the five primary conifer species in Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1695–1703.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wheeler N.C., Critchfield W.B. 1985. The distribution and botanical characteristics of lodgepole pine: biogeographical and management implications. In: Lodgepole pine, the species and its management (ed.: D.M. Baumgartner et al.). Washington State University, Pullman, 1–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whiteman A., Brown C. 1999. The potential role of forest plantations in meeting future demands for industrial wood products. International Forestry Review, 1, 143–152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Žiogas A., Juronis V., Sneškiene V., Gabrilavičius R. 2006. Pathological condition of introduced conifers in the forests of South-Western and Western Lithuania. Baltic Forestry, 12, 234–242.]Search in Google Scholar
