Exploring the Factors Associated with MOOC Engagement, Retention and the Wider Benefits for Learners

1. Caufield, M., Collier, A., & Halawa, S. (2013). Rethinking online community in MOOCs used for blended learning. Educause Review Online, 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

2. DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “course:” reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74-84.10.3102/0013189X14523038Search in Google Scholar

3. Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative Methods in Educational Research: The role of numbers.Search in Google Scholar

4. Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., & Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal (Online First).10.3102/0002831215584621Search in Google Scholar

5. Guardia, L., Maina, M., & Sangra, A. (2013). MOOC design principles: A pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. eLearning Papers, 33.Search in Google Scholar

6. Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs.10.1145/2556325.2566247Search in Google Scholar

7. Hadi, S. M., & Gagen, P. (2016). New model for measuring MOOCs completion rates. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/20434486/New_model_for_measuring_MOOCs_completion_ratesSearch in Google Scholar

8. Hadi, S. M., & Rawson, R. (2016). Driving learner engagement and completion within MOOCs: a case for structured learning support. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hew, K. F. (2014). Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology (Online First).Search in Google Scholar

10. Hone, K. S., & El Said, G, R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Computers and Education, 98, 157-168.10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016Search in Google Scholar

11. Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2014. EADTU. Retrieved from http://www.eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

12. Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth. Educause Review.Search in Google Scholar

13. Leach, M., Hadi, S. M., & Bostock, A. (2016). Supporting diverse learner goals through modular design and micro-learning. Paper presented at the European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. London: Continuum, made easy.Search in Google Scholar

14. Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.10.1177/1052562904271199Search in Google Scholar

15. Petronzi, D., Hadi, S. M., & Leach, M. (2016). Do self-assigned learning intentions reflect upon or predict MOOC engagement? Unpublished Research Paper.Search in Google Scholar