Acceso abierto

Quality of Rivers: Comparison of Hydro-Morphological, Physical-Chemical and Biological Methods


Cite

[1] Du Plessis A, Global Water Scarcity and Possible Conflicts Freshwater Challenges of South Africa and Its Upper Vaal River: Current State and Outlook. Springer Water. 2017; 45-62. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319495019.10.1007/978-3-319-49502-6_3Search in Google Scholar

[2] McDonald RIP, Green D, Balk BM, Fekete C, Revenga M, Montgomery TM. Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(15):6312-6317. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011615108.10.1073/pnas.1011615108307688021444797Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Srebotnjak T, Carr G, de Sherbinin A, Rickwood C. A global Water Quality Index and hot-deck imputation of missing data. Ecol Indic. 2012; 17:108-119. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Turley MD, Bilotta GS, Extence CA, Brazier RE. Evaluation of a fine sediment biomonitoring tool across a wide range of temperate rivers and streams. Freshwater Biol. 2014;59(11):2268-2277 DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12429.10.1111/fwb.12429Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Nichols SJ, Barmuta LA, Chessman BC, Davies PE, Dyer FJ, Harrison ET, et al. The imperative need for nationally coordinated bioassessment of rivers and streams. Mar Freshwater Res. 2017;68(4):599-613. DOI: 10.1071/mf15329.10.1071/MF15329Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Beavan L, Sadler J, Pinder L. The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia. 2001;445:97-108. DOI: 10.1023/a:1017584105641.10.1023/a:1017584105641Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Tavzes B, Urbanic G, Toman MJ. Biological and hydromorphological integrity of the small urban stream. Phys Chem Earth. 2006;31:1062-1074. DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2006.07.009.10.1016/j.pce.2006.07.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Sandin L. The relationship between land-use, hydromorphology and river biota at different spatial and temporal scales: a synthesis of seven case studies. Fund Appl Limnol. 2009;174:1-5. DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0174-0001.10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0174-0001Search in Google Scholar

[9] Fan JT, Semenzin E, Meng W, Giubilato E, Zhang Y, Critto. et al. Ecological status classification of the Taizi River Basin, China: a comparison of integrated risk assessment approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(19):14738-14754. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4629-x.10.1007/s11356-015-4629-x25989855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Miserendino M, Kutschker A, Brand C, La Manna L, Di Prinzio C, Papazian G, et al. Ecological status of a Patagonian mountain river: Usefulness of environmental and biotic metrics for rehabilitation assessment. Environ Manage. 2016;57(6):1166-1187. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0688-0.10.1007/s00267-016-0688-026961305Search in Google Scholar

[11] Directive 2000/60/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 23 Oct. 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (WFD). Official J Europ Communities L 327/1, 2000. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Duffy BT, George SD, Baldigo BP, Smith AJ. Assessing condition of macroinvertebrate communities and bed sediment toxicity in the Rochester Embayment Area of Concern, New York, USA. J Great Lakes Res. 2017; 43(5):890-898. DOI:10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.002.10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, van Oel PR. Advancing Water Footprint Assessment research: Challenges in monitoring progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 6. Water-Sui. 2017;9(6). DOI: 10.3390/w9060438.10.3390/w9060438Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Szoszkiewicz KS, Jusik, I, Lewin I. Czerniawska-Kusza J, Kupiec M, Szostak M. Macrophyte and macroinvertebrate patterns in unimpacted mountain rivers of two European ecoregions. Hydrobiologia. 2018;808(1):327-342. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3435-5.10.1007/s10750-017-3435-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Heatherly TII, Whiles MR, Royer TV, David MB. Relationships between water quality, habitat quality, and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Illinois streams. J Environ Qual. 2007;36:1653-1660. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0521.10.2134/jeq2006.052117940265Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Verdonschot PFM. Impact of hydromorphology and spatial scale on macroinvertebrate assemblage composition in streams. Integr Environ Assess Manage. 2009;5:97-109. DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-028.1.10.1897/IEAM_2008-028.119431295Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Timm H, Kairo K, Mols T, Virro T. An index to assess hydromorphological quality of Estonian surface waters based on macroinvertebrate taxonomic composition. Limnologica. 2011;41:398-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2011.09.006.10.1016/j.limno.2011.09.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Cortelezzi A, Sierra MV, Gomez N, Marinelli C, Capitulo AR. Macrophytes, epipelic biofilm, and invertebrates as biotic indicators of physical habitat degradation of lowland streams (Argentina). Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:5801-5815. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2985-2.10.1007/s10661-012-2985-223149840Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Urbanic G. Hydromorphological degradation impact on benthic invertebrates in large rivers in Slovenia. Hydrobiologia. 2014;729:191-207. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1430-4.10.1007/s10750-012-1430-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Błachuta J, Szoszkiewicz K, Gebler D, Schneider SC. How do environmental parameters relate to macroinvertebrate metrics? Prospects for river water quality assessment. Pol J Ecol. 2014;62:111-122. DOI: 10.3161/104.062.0111.10.3161/104.062.0111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Rajfur M, Kłos A. Use of algae in active biomonitoring of surface waters. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21(4):561-576. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2014-0040.10.1515/eces-2014-0040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Bis B, Zdanowicz A, Zalewski M. Effects of catchment properties on hydrochemistry, habitat complexity and invertebrate community structure in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia. 2000;422/423:369-387. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017002923173.10.1023/A:1017002923173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Pistocchi A, Udias A, Grizzetti B, Gelati E, Koundouri P, Ludwig R, et al. An integrated assessment framework for the analysis of multiple pressures in aquatic ecosystems and the appraisal of management options. Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:1477-1488. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.020.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Valero E, Alvarez X, Picos J. An assessment of river habitat quality as an indicator of conservation status. A case study in the Northwest of Spain. Ecol Indic. 2015;57:131-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.032.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.032Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Raport o stanie środowiska województwa lubelskiego w 2003 roku. [Report on the state of the environment of Lublin Voivodship in 2003]. Lublin: Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska; 2004. http://www.wios.lublin.pl/srodowisko/raporty-o-stanie-srodowiska/.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Hooper FF, Kohler SL. Measurement of stream velocity and discharge. Chapter 19. In: Schneider JC, editor. Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: With Periodic Updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor; 2000; 1-5. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/SMII_Assembled_Doc_2017_final_552610_7.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Oglęcki P, Pawłat H. The index method of small lowland river environmental evaluation. Annals of Warsaw Agriculture University. SGGW, Land Reclamation, 2000;30:37-43.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ilnicki P, Lewandowski P. Ekomorfologiczna waloryzacja dróg wodnych Wielkopolski. [Ecomorphological evaluation of waterways in Wielkopolska]. Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu; 1997; 128. ISBN: 8390860503, 9788390860503.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Hermanowicz W, Dożańska W, Dojlido J, Koziorowski B. Fizyczno-chemiczne badanie wody i ścieków. [Physical-chemical investigations of water and sewage]. Warszawa: Arkady Press; 1999; 848. ISBN: 9788321340678.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 9 listopada 2011 r. w sprawie sposobu klasyfikacji stanu jednolitych części wód powierzchniowych oraz środowiskowych norm jakości dla substancji priorytetowych. [Regulation of the Polish Ministry of the Environment of 9 November 2011. on the methods of classification of surface waters and environmental quality standards for priority substances]. Dziennik Ustaw Nr 257, poz. 1545. isap.sejm.gov.pl/Download?id=WDU20112571545&type=2.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Montusiewicz M, Chomczyńska J, Malicki J, Łagód G. Biofilm sampling for bioindication of municipal wastewater treatment. In: Pawłowski L, Dudzińska MR, Pawłowski A. editor. Environmental Engineering III. London: CRC Press; 2010; 491-496. ISBN: 9780415548823.10.1201/b10566-78Search in Google Scholar

[32] Quigley M. Invertebrates of Stream and Rivers. Edward Arnold, London, 1977. ISBN-13: 978-0713100914.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Cranston PS. A key to the larvae of the British Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae). Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication; 1982; 152. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19830680229.10.1002/iroh.19830680229Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Wiederholm T. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 1, Larvae. Entomol Scand. Supplement 19;1983.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Extence CA, Bates AJ, Forbes WJ, Barham PJ. Biologically based water quality management. Environ Pollut. 1987;45:221-236. DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(87)90059-5.10.1016/0269-7491(87)90059-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Kownacki A, Soszka H, Fleituch T, Kudelska D. The ecological assessment of river quality in Poland on the basis of communities of benthic invertebrates, In: Kownacki A, Soszka H, Fleituch T, Kudelska D, editors. River Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrate Communities. Warszawa-Kraków: Institute of Environmental Protection; 2002; 71-88. ISBN: 8385444904.Search in Google Scholar

[37] King D, Ball RC. A quantitative biological measure of stream pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1964;36:650-653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25035074.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Goodnight C. Use of aquatic macroinvertebrates as indicators of stream pollution. T Am Microsc Soc. 1973;92:1-13. DOI: 10.2307/3225166.10.2307/3225166Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[39] Wiederholm T. Use of benthos in lake monitoring. J Wat Poll Control. 1980;52:537-547. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25040750.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5.). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, 2002. www. http://edepot.wur.nl/405659.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Ter Braak CJF. Canonical community ordination. Part I: Basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience. 1994;1(2):127-140. DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237.10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Hammer Ř, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4(1):9pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Łagód G, Chomczyńska M, Montusiewicz A, Malicki J, Bieganowski A. Proposal of measurement and visualization methods for dominance structures in the saprobe communities. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2009;16(3):369-377. http://tchie.uni.opole.pl/freeECE/S_16_3/LagodChomczynska_16(3).pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Łagód G, Chomczyńska M, Montusiewicz A, Malicki J, Stransky D. Methods applied for measurement and visualization of changes in biodiversity. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21(4):593-604. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2014-0042.10.1515/eces-2014-0042Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Grzybowski M, Endler Z. Hydro-morphological evaluation of the Łyna River along the Kotowo-Ardapy section. Quaest Geograph. 2012;31(1):51-65. DOI: 10.2478/v10117-012-0008-6.10.2478/v10117-012-0008-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Buffagni A, Erba S, Cazzola M, Kemp JL. The AQEM multimetric system for the southern Italian Apennines: assessing the impact of water quality and habitat degradation on pool macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:313-329. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025273.15958.6a.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025273.15958.6aOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot PFM. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:1-20. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025255.70009.a5.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025255.70009.a5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] Lorenz A, Hering D, Feld CK, Rolauffs P. A new method for assessing the impact of morphological degradation on the benthic invertebrate fauna for streams in Germany. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:107-127. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[49] Gorzel M, Kornijów R. The response of zoobenthos to “natural channelization” of a small river. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 2007;7:261-272. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359307701891.10.1016/S1642-3593(07)70189-1Search in Google Scholar

[50] Koperski P. Reduced diversity and stability of chironomid assemblages (Chironomidae, Diptera) as the effect of moderate stream degradation. Pol J Ecol. 2009;57:125-138. aeu.miiz.waw.pl/pliki/article/ar57_1_10.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Wyżga B, Oglęcki P, Radecki-Pawlik A, Skalski T, Zawiejska J. Hydromorphological complexity as a driver of the diversity of benthic invertebrate communities communities in the Czarny Dunajec River, Polish Carpathians. Hydrobiologia. 2012;696:29-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1180-3.10.1007/s10750-012-1180-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[52] Ji ZG. Hydrodynamics and Water Quality: Modeling Rivers, Lakes, and Estuaries. 2nd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley Sons; 2017. ISBN: 978-1-118-87715-9.Search in Google Scholar

[53] De Pauw N, Ghetti PE, Manzani P, Spaggiari R. Biological assessment methods for running water. In: Newman P, Piavaux NA, Sweeting RA, editors. River Water Quality. Ecological Assessment and Control. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities; 1992:217-248.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993. ISBN 0412022516. DOI: 10.2307/1467358.10.2307/1467358Search in Google Scholar

[55] Fleituch T, Soszka H, Kudelska D, Kownacki A. Macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality in rivers: a scientific basis for Polish standard method. Large Rivers. 2002;13:225-239. DOI: 10.1127/lr/13/2002/225.10.1127/lr/13/2002/225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[56] Raczyńska M, Żurawska J, Chojnacki JC. The problem of quality assessment of surface lotic waters as exemplified by rivers Tywa and Rurzyca. EJPAU. 2000;3:1-17. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume3/issue1/fisheries/art-03.html.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hynes HBN. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press;1960; 202. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19610460321.10.1002/iroh.19610460321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1898-6196
Idioma:
Inglés