[Bakutytė, R., Ušeckienė, L., & Iliško, Dz. (2016). The development of implementation of learner – centered assessment in pedagogical requalification studies. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach, 56–62. doi: 10.21277/sw.v2i6.264.10.21277/sw.v2i6.264]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Broks, A. (2000). Systemology of Education. Riga: RaKa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bio ecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.) Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of Child Psychology. (pp. 793–828.). New York: Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: MA Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674028845]Search in Google Scholar
[Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructions. London: Rout ledge.10.4324/9780203299968]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooney, A. (2010). Choosing between Glaser and Strauss: an example. Nurse Research, 17 (4), 18–28.10.7748/nr2010.07.17.4.18.c7921]Search in Google Scholar
[Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). (3rd Ed.). The SAGE hand book of qualitative research. Thousandd Oaks, California: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drengson, A., & Inoue, Y. (1995). (Eds.). The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology. Berkeley: North Atlantic Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.), (pp. 191–216.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallberg, L. (2006). The core category of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(3), 141–148.10.1080/17482620600858399]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodder, I. (2000). (2nd Ed.). The interpretations of documents and material culture. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 703–715.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, G., & Gürtler, L. (2013). AQUAD 7. Manual: the analysis of qualitative data. Tübingen: Softwarevertrieb Günter Huber. Retrieved from http://www.aquad.de/materials/manual_aquad7/manual-e.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, G.L., & Gürtler, L. (2004). AQUAD six: Manual for the analysis of qualitative data. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mollenhauer, K. (1973). Education and emancipation. München: Juventa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Næss, A., & Haukeland, P.I. (2008). Life’s philosophy: reason & feeling in a deeper world. Athens GA, University of Georgia press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Naess, A. (1991). Ecology, community and lifestyle. London: Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothenberg, D. (1996). No world but in things: The poetry of Naess’s concept contents. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 39(2), 255–272.10.1080/00201749608602420]Search in Google Scholar
[Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Zariņa, S., & Oļehnoviča, E. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education course development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 135–153.10.1515/jtes-2016-0020]Search in Google Scholar
[Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–17.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Salīte, I. (1998). An eco-centric paradigm: An important tool for teachers of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 81–85.10.1017/S0814062600003979]Search in Google Scholar
[Schostak, J. F. (2002). Understanding, designing and conducting qualitative research in Education: framing the Project. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steger, B. M. (2009). (2nd Ed.). Globalization: a very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for Developing grounded theory: second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tudge, J., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B., & Karnik, R. (2009). (Ed.). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioeclogical theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 198–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (2002). Education, public awareness and training for sustainability: Input to the Report of the Secretary General to the Second Preparatory Session for the World Summit on Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved from: http://www.earthcharter.org]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, D. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–558.10.1177/1049732305285972]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, K. (2006). Research in constructivist frameworks using ethnographic techniques, Library Trends, 55(1), 83–101.10.1353/lib.2006.0054]Search in Google Scholar