Measuring the Aesthetic Success of Books: Can User-driven Databases Fill the Gap?

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997Search in Google Scholar

Beck, J. (2006). The sales effect of word of mouth: A model for creative goods and estimates for novels. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31, 5-23.10.1007/s10824-006-9029-0Search in Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1975). Extension to Indian subjects of a study of exploratory and verbal responses to visual patterns. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 316-330.10.1177/002202217563004Search in Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1976). Similarity and preference judgments of Indian and Canadian subjects exposed to Western paintings. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 43-55.10.1080/00207597608247346Search in Google Scholar

Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 197-222.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50.10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Search in Google Scholar

Chandler, O. (2013, July 23). Goodreads grows to 20 million readers [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/blog/show/425-goodreads-grows-to-20-million-readersSearch in Google Scholar

Child, I. L. (1981). Bases of transcultural agreement in response to art. In Advances in Intrinsic Motivation and Aesthetics (pp. 415-432). Boston, MA: Springer US.Search in Google Scholar

Clement, M., Proppe, D., & Sambeth, F. (2006). Der Einfluss von Meinungsführern auf den Erfolg von hedonischen Produkten [The impact of opinion leaders on the success of hedonic products]. Journal of Business Economics, 76, 797-824.10.1007/s11573-006-0038-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clerides, S. K. (2002). Book value: Intertemporal pricing and quality discrimination in the US market for books. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1385-1408.10.1016/S0167-7187(02)00004-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1-12.10.1371/journal.pone.0121945Search in Google Scholar

Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 35-40.10.1037/a0038688Search in Google Scholar

Form, S. (2017). Reaching wuthering heights with brave new words: The influence oforiginality of words on the success of paramount bestsellers. Journal of creative behavior, accepted. Search in Google Scholar

Form, S., Schlichting, K., & Kaernbach, C. (2017). Mentoring functions: Interpersonal tensions are associated with mentees’ creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, accepted.10.1037/aca0000103Search in Google Scholar

Fidelman, M. (2012, October 16). These are top 25 book reviewers on Goodreads (infographic). Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/markfidelman/2012/10/16/goodreads-ceo-these-top-25-book-reviewers-represent-the-future-infographic/?ss=strategies-solutionsSearch in Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21-28.10.1037/a0017863Search in Google Scholar

Hittner, J., May, K., & Silver, N. C. (2003). A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations. The Journal of General Psychology, 130, 149-168.10.1080/00221300309601282Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83-91.10.1080/10400419.2012.649237Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223-233.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178.10.1080/10400410802059929Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332-340.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. (N. L. K. Alan S. Kaufman, Ed.), Essentials Psychological Assessment Series. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Keuschnigg, M. (2012). Das Bestseller-Phänomen: Die Entstehung von Nachfragekonzentration im Buchmarkt [The bestseller phenomenon: The emergence of demand concentration in the book market]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1995). Fame more fickle than fortune: On the distribution of literary eminence. Poetics, 23, 219-234.10.1016/0304-422X(94)00026-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morra, S., & Lazzarini, S. (2002). A cross-cultural study of response to Icelandic and Italian folktales. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 61-82.10.2190/RJAD-Q740-TE4M-EHR5Search in Google Scholar

Nell, V. (1988a). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3vk3Search in Google Scholar

Nell, V. (1988b). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 6-50.10.2307/747903Search in Google Scholar

Pénet, P., & Lee, K. (2014). Prize & price: The Turner Prize as a valuation device in the contemporary art market. Poetics, 43(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.01.00310.1016/j.poetic.2014.01.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Plucker, J. a., Holden, J., & Neustadter, D. (2008). The criterion problem and creativity in film: Psychometric characteristics of various measures. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 190-196.10.1037/a0012839Search in Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47-68.10.1348/000712609X414204Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Stölting, C., Blömeke, E., & Clement, M. (2011). Success drivers of fiction books: An empirical analysis of hardcover and paperback editions in Germany. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 24-47.10.1080/08997764.2011.549428Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Masterpieces in music and literature: Historiometric inquires. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_210.1207/s15326934crj1102_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Film as art versus film as business: Differential correlates of screenplay characteristics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 93-117.10.2190/DM5Y-FHEM-CXQT-UEXWSearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2007). Film music: Are award-winning scores and songs heard in successful motion pictures? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 53-60.10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.53Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2009a). Cinematic success, aesthetics, and economics: An exploratory recursive model. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 128-138.10.1037/a0014521Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2009b). Cinematic success criteria and their predictors: The art and business of the film industry. Psychology & Marketing, 26, 400-420.10.1002/mar.20280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2014). Significant samples-not significance tests! The often overlookedsolution to the replication problem. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 11-12.10.1037/a0035849Search in Google Scholar

Sorensen, A. T. (2007). Bestseller lists and product variety. The Journal of Industrial Ec onomics, 55, 715-738.10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00327.xSearch in Google Scholar

Staw, B. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations (pp. 161-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75-101. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01223.xSearch in Google Scholar

The top 100 bestselling books of all time: How does Fifty Shades of Grey compare? (2012, August). The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/aug/09/best-selling-books-all-time-fifty-shades-grey-compareSearch in Google Scholar

Top-selling 100 books of all time. (2011, January). The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/jan/01/top-100-books-of-all-time#dataSearch in Google Scholar