[Ambrose, D. (2005). Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations. Insight from beyond our field. Roeper Review, 27, 137-143.10.1080/02783190509554307]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, M., & Freedman, D. (Eds.) (2011). The assault on universities. A manifesto for resistance. London: Pluto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauer, H. H. (2012). Dogmatism in science and medicine. How dominant theories monopolize research and stifle the search for truth. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02]Search in Google Scholar
[Hil, R. (2012). Whackademia: an insider’s account of the troubled university. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nocella, A. J., Best, S., & McLaren, P. (Eds.) (2010). Academic repression. Reflections from the academic industrial complex. Oakland, CA: AK Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, R. S. (2012). Increasing self-awareness, decreasing dogmatism and expanding disciplinary horizons: synthesising a plan of action towards culture sensitivity. Gifted and Talented International, 27, 1, 135-154.10.1080/15332276.2012.11673622]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, R. S. (2013). Who decides what giftedness is? International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 2, 27-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rider, S., & Hasselberg, A. (Eds.). (2013). Transformations in research, higher education and the academic market. The breakdown of scientific thought. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Science.10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Segerstråhle, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth. The battle for science in the socio-biology debate and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
