[1. Anusavice K.J.: Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J. Dent. Educ., 69, 538, 2005.10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.5.tb03941.x]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Boguszewska-Gutenbaum H. et al.: Rozmieszczenie ubytków próchnicowych na poszczególnych powierzchniach w zębach mlecznych u dzieci do 36 miesiąca życia. Czas. Stomat., 50, 795, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brown A., Krause F., Jepsen S.: The influence of the calibration mode of a laser fluorescence device on caries detection. Caries Res., 39, 144, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Chłapowska J., Żmijewska C.: Diagnostyka próchnicy powierzchni stycznych w badaniu klinicznym, transiluminacyjnym i radiologicznym. Stom. Współcz., 6, 32, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Forgie A.H., Pine C.M., Pitts N.B.: The assessment of an intra-oral video camera as an aid to occlusal caries detection. Int. Dent. J., 53, 3, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Haak R., Wicht M.J., Noack M.J.: Conventional, digital and contrastenhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions. Caries Res., 35, 193, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hintze H: Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography, compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children. Caries Res., 27, 499, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hintze H., Wenzel A.: Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemi-sectioning and serial tooth sectioning. Caries Res., 37, 115, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hintze H., Wenzel A., Danielsen B.: Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5- year longitudinal study in young adults. Caries Res., 33, 415, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Huysman M.C, Longbottom C.: The challenges of validating diagnostic methods and selecting appropriate gold standards. J. Dent. Res., 83, C48, 2004.10.1177/154405910408301s1015286122]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Jędrychowska P., Zarzecka J.: Wybrane, współczesne metody diagnozowania początkowych zmian próchnicowych. Por. Stomat. 6, 22, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kulczyk T.: Wykrywanie ognisk próchnicy za pomocą zdjęć skrzydłowo-zgryzowych. Mag. Stomat., 14, 31, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kühnisch J., Bucher K., Hickel R.: The intra/inter-examiner reproducibility of the new DIAGNOdent Pen on occlusal sites. J. Dent., 35, 509, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lussi A. et al.: Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device. Caries Res., 40, 97, 2006.10.1159/00009105416508265]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Marsh P., Martin M.: Mikrobiologia jamy ustnej. PWN Warszawa 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Maupomé G., Sheiham A.: Decisions on diagnosis and management of approximal caries by final‑year dental students. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 26, 107, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Mirska-Miętek M.: Diagnozowanie zmian próchnicowych na powierzchniach stycznych zębów stałych. Ann. Acad. Med. Stetin., 56, 70, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Nyvad B.: Diagnosis versus detection of caries. Caries Res., 38, 192, 2004.10.1159/00007775415153688]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Paruzel-Pliskowska A. et al.: Wykrywanie próchnicy pierwotnej za pomocą zdjęć ortopantomograficznych oraz aparatu DIAGNOcam (KaVo) - doniesienie wstępne. Stom. Współcz., 21, 18, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Pitts N.B.: Clinical diagnosis of dental caries. A European perspective. J. Dent. Educ., 65, 973, 2001.10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03472.x]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Pitts N.B.: Modern concepts of caries measurement. J. Dent. Res., 83, C43, 2004.10.1177/154405910408301s0915286121]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Popoola B.O. et al.: A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis on posterior teeth of children seen at a Nigerian teaching hospital. Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci., 39, 41, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Ratledge D.K., Kidd E.A.M., Beighton D.: A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Part 1: the relationship between cavitation, radiographic lesion depth, the site-specific gingival index and the level of infection of the dentine. Caries Res., 35, 3, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Różyło‑Kalinowska I., Różyło T.K.: Zdjęcia rentgenowskie w stomatologii a narażenie na promieniowanie jonizujące. Mag. Stomat., 12, 40, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Schmid R. et al.: Amine fluoride and monofluorophosphate: I. Historical review of fluoride dentifrices. ASDC J. Dent. Child., 51, 99, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Söchtig F., Hickel R, Kühnisch J.: Caries detection and diagnosis with near-infrared light transillumination: clinical experiences. Quintessence Int.,45, 531, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Szafrańska B, Waszkiel D.: Rozmieszczenie ubytków próchnicowych na poszczególnych powierzchniach zębów mlecznych u dzieci białostockich. Nowa Stom., 14, 68, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Wenzel A., Hintze H.: The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 28, 132, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O: Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res., 26, 188, 1992.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Woźniak J. et al.: Powtarzalność pomiarów fluorescencji za pomocą aparatu Diagnodent® na powierzchniach żujących zębów trzonowych w warunkach in vitro. Dent. Med. Probl., 45, 255, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
