[1. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Setting of the Predicted Difficult Airway // Anesthesiology, 2012; 116:629-636]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Baker P. Assessment Before Airway Management // Anesthesiol Clin, 2015; 33:257-278]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Cavus E, Thee C, Moeller T, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Wagner K. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia // BMC Anesthesiol, 2011; 11:6]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cook TM, Macdougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management // Br J Anaesth, 2012; 10910.1093/bja/aes39323242753]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cortellazzi P, Minati L, Falcone C, Lamperti M, Caldiroli D. Predictive value of the El-Ganzouri multivariate risk index for difficult tracheal intubation: A comparison of Glidescope® videolaryngoscopy and conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy // Br J Anaesth, 2007; 99:906-911]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Eiamcharoenwit J, Itthisompaiboon N, Limpawattana P, Siriussawakul A. The Performance of the Intubation Difficulty Scale among Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Section // Biomed Res Int, 2017; 201710.1155/2017/3075756529915628246593]Search in Google Scholar
[7. El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index // Anesth Analg, 1996; 82:1197-1204]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Naguib M, Scamman FL, O’Sullivan C, et al. Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: A doubleblind, case-controlled study // Anesth Analg, 2006; 102:818-824]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: A topical review of the literature //. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2010; 54:1050-106110.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02285.x20887406]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Selvi O, Kahraman T, Senturk O, Tulgar S, Serifsoy E, Ozer Z. Evaluation of the reliability of preoperative descriptive airway assessment tests in prediction of the Cormack-Lehane score: A prospective randomized clinical study // J Clin Anesth, 2017; 36:21-26]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: A randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways // Minerva Anestesiol, 2013; 79:121-129]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with videoassisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope // Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010; 27:24-30]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A, & Na; Predicting Difficult Intubation in Apparently Normal Patients // Anesthesiology, 2005; 103: 429-43710.1097/00000542-200508000-0002716052126]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Sulser S, Ubmann D, Brueesch M, et al. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with conventional laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation at the emergency department: study protocol // Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2015; 23:38.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Teoh WHL, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia ATH. Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MACTM, Glidescope® vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation // Anaesthesia, 2010; 65:1126-1132]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Xue F-S, Li H-X, Liu Y-Y, Yang G-Z. Current evidence for the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adult airway management: a review of the literature //Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2017; 13: 831-841]Search in Google Scholar