[[1] Eliáš P. Ecological and social functions of vegetation. Ekológia (Bratislava). 1983;2:93-104. DOI: 147.213.211.222/node/3806.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos. 2007;116:882-892. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Hodgson JG, Wilson PJ, Hunt R, Grime JP, Thompson K. Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos. 1999;85:282-294. DOI: 10.2307/3546494.10.2307/3546494]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O. Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci. 1999;10:609-620. DOI: 10.2307/3237076.10.2307/3237076]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot. 2003;51:335-380. DOI: 10.1071/BT02124.10.1071/BT02124]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Reich PB, Wright IJ, Lusk CH. Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: A global GLOPNET analysis. Ecol Appl. 2007;17:1982-1988. DOI: 10.1890/06-1803.1.10.1890/06-1803.1]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Májeková M, de Bello F, Dolezal J, Lepš J. Plant functional traits as determinants of population stability. Ecology. 2014;95(9):2369-2374. DOI: 10.1890/13-1880.1.10.1890/13-1880.1]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Májeková M., Janeček Š, Mudrák O, Horník J, Janečková P, Bartoš M, et al. Consistent functional response of meadow species and communities to land-use changes across productivity and soil moisture gradients. Appl Veg Sci. 2016 (in press).10.1111/avsc.12223]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Májeková M, Vykouková I, Masarovičová E. Leaf turgor loss point in relation to soil moisture and leaf dry matter content. Phytopedon (Bratislava). 2015;14(1):1-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997;12:474-478. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6.10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Westoby M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil. 1998;199:213-227. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004327224729.10.1023/A:1004327224729]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol. 2002;16:545-556. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Diaz S, Cabido M. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J Veg Sci. 1997;8:463-474. DOI: 10.2307/3237198.10.2307/3237198]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Masarovičová E., Májeková M., Vykouková I. Functional traits and plasticity of the plants. In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of Photosynthesis. Third edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC; 2015 (in press).10.1201/b19498-36]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Sultan SE. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci. 2000; 5:537-542. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0.10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Miklos GLG, Rubin GM. The role of the genome project in determining gene function: insights from model organisms. Cell. 1996;86:521-529. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80126-9.10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80126-9]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Trewavas AJ, Malhó R. Signal perception and transduction: the origin of the phenotype. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1181-1195. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1181.10.1105/tpc.9.7.118115699012237382]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Schlichting CD. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1986;17:667-693. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097012.10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.003315]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Sultan SE. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol Biol. 1987;21:127-178. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6986-2_7.10.1007/978-1-4615-6986-2_7]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Bradshaw AD, Hardwick K. Evolution and stress: genotypic and phenotypic components. Biol J Linn Soc. 1989;37:137-155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02099.x.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02099.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Funct Ecol. 1996;10:44-50. DOI: 10.2307/2390260.10.2307/2390260]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Sultan SE, Wilczek AM, Bell DL, Hand G. Physiological response to complex environments in annual Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Oecologia. 1998;115:564-578. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050554.10.1007/s00442005055428308277]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Ryser P, Eek L. Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources. Am J Bot. 2000;87:402-411. http://www.amjbot.org/content/87/3/402.10.2307/2656636]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Emery RJN, Chinnappa CC, Chmielewski JG. Specialization, plant strategies, and phenotypic plasticity in populations of Stellaria longipes along an elevational gradient. Int J Plant Sci. 1994;155:203-219. www.jstor.org/stable/2995565.10.1086/297160]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Küppers M. Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a central European hedgerow. I. Photosynthetic characteristics. Oecologia. 1984;64:332-343. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379131.10.1007/BF0037913128311449]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Deregibus VA, Sanchez RA, Casal JJ. Effects of light quality on tiller production in Lolium spp. Plant Physiol. 1983;72:900-902. DOI: 10.1104/pp.72.3.900.10.1104/pp.72.3.900106634116663106]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Poorter H, Van de Vijver CADM, Boot RGA, Lambers H. Growth and carbon economy of a fast-growing and a slow-growing grass species as dependent on nitrate supply. Plant Soil. 1995;171:217-227. DOI: 10.1007/BF00010275.10.1007/BF00010275]Search in Google Scholar