1. bookVolumen 8 (2015): Edición 2 (December 2015)
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
05 Feb 2009
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Acceso abierto

Copyright and Free Speech: The Human Rights Perspective

Publicado en línea: 29 Feb 2016
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 8 (2015) - Edición 2 (December 2015)
Páginas: 182 - 202
Recibido: 02 Dec 2015
Aceptado: 31 Dec 2015
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
05 Feb 2009
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año

1. Adams, Guy. “‘The day I realized my toddler was addicted to the iPad’: Three-year-old William tugged at the duvet and woke his father demanding the tablet… at 4am” (January 2014) // http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2548365/As-revealed-one-three-children-use-tablet-talk-fathers-alarming-story-The-day-I-realised-toddler-addicted-iPad.html.Search in Google Scholar

2. Beas Rodrigues, Edson. The General Exception Clauses of the TRIPS Agreement: Promoting Sustainable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139084222Search in Google Scholar

3. Birnhack, Michael. “Acknowledging Conflict between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act.” Entertainment Law Review 24 (2003): 1–35.10.2139/ssrn.368961Search in Google Scholar

4. Cook, Trevor. “Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 17 (2012): 243–245.Search in Google Scholar

5. Cornish, William. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks & Allied Rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dinwoodie, Graeme. “Copyright Lawmaking Authority: An (Inter)Nationalist Perspective on the Treaty Clause.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 30 (2007): 355–395.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dworkin, Ronald, ed. The Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

8. European Court of Human Rights. “Interlaken Follow-Up” (July 2010) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2010_Interlaken_Follow-up_ENG.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fatima, Shaheed. Using International Law in Domestic Courts. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

10. Geiger, Christophe, ed. Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.10.4337/9781781001646Search in Google Scholar

11. Griffiths, Jonathan, and Uma Suthersanen, eds. Copyright and Free Speech. Comparative and International Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

12. Grosheide, Willem, ed. Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.10.4337/9781849802048Search in Google Scholar

13. Helfer, Laurence, and Graeme Austin. Human Rights and Intellectual Property. Mapping the Global Interface. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511976032Search in Google Scholar

14. Helfer, Laurence. “Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexistence?” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 5 (2003): 47–61.10.2139/ssrn.459120Search in Google Scholar

15. Helfer, Laurence. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 49 (2008): 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lee, Joo-Young. A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015.10.4324/9781315564845Search in Google Scholar

17. MacNaughton, Gillian, and Diane Frey. “Decent Work for All: A Holistic Human Rights Approach.” American University International Law Review 26 (2011): 441–483.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mtima, Lateef ed. Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.10.4337/9781783470259Search in Google Scholar

19. Nimmer, Melville. “Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 17 (1970): 1180–1204.Search in Google Scholar

20. Richards, Neil. Intellectual Privacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

21. Rosati, Eleonora. “Copyright in the EU: In Search of (In)Flexibilities.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9 (2014): 585–598.10.1093/jiplp/jpu034Search in Google Scholar

22. Sadurski, Wojciech. Freedom of Speech and Its Limits. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.10.1007/978-94-010-9342-2Search in Google Scholar

23. Swan, Charles. “When Does Freedom of Speech Trump Copyright?” (February 2013) // http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/feb/13/freedom-speech-trump-copyright.Search in Google Scholar

24. Torremans, Paul, ed. Copyright and Human Rights: Freedom of Expression, Intellectual Property, Privacy. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

25. Torremans, Paul. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Enhanced Edition of Copyright and Human Rights. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

26. Voorhoof, Dirk, and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen. “ECHR: Copyright vs. Freedom of Expression” (January 2013) // http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2013/01/25/echr-copyright-vs-freedom-of-expression/.Search in Google Scholar

27. Waldron, Jeremy. “From Authors to Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values in Intellectual Property.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 68 (1992): 841–887.Search in Google Scholar

1. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal. European Court of Human Rights. 2007, no. 73049/01.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ashby Donald and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 36769/08.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ashdown v. Telegraph Group Ltd. Court of Appeal of England and Wales. 2001, 4 All ER 666.Search in Google Scholar

4. Axel Springer AG v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights. 2012, no. 39954/08.Search in Google Scholar

5. Balan v. Moldova. European Court of Human Rights. 2008, no. 19247/03.Search in Google Scholar

6. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. 1886, 1161 U.N.T.S. 3.Search in Google Scholar

7. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal, 2012, C 326/391.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chassagnou and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 1999, nos. 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/95.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cohen v. California. Supreme Court of the United States. 1971, 403 U.S. 15.Search in Google Scholar

10. Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, 2010, C 326/47.Search in Google Scholar

11. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222.Search in Google Scholar

12. Council Directive 91/250 on the legal protection of computer programmes. Official Journal, 1991, L 122.Search in Google Scholar

13. Council Directive 92/100 on rental and lending rights and certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property. Official Journal, 1992, L 346.Search in Google Scholar

14. Council Directive 93/83 on the co-ordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission. Official Journal, 1993, L 248.Search in Google Scholar

15. Council Directive 93/98 harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Official Journal, 1993, L 290.Search in Google Scholar

16. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Official Journal, 2001, L 167.Search in Google Scholar

17. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of databases. Official Journal, 1996, L 77.Search in Google Scholar

18. Eldred v. Ashcroft. Supreme Court of the United States. 2003, 537 U.S. 186.Search in Google Scholar

19. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises. Supreme Court of the United States. 1985, 471 U.S. 539.Search in Google Scholar

20. Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 40397/12.Search in Google Scholar

21. Peck v. United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 2003, no. 44647/98.Search in Google Scholar

22. Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 1979, no. 6538/74.Search in Google Scholar

23. United Nations Vienna Declaration of Programme of Action. 1993, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/23.Search in Google Scholar

24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948, G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, U.N. Doc. A/RES/217(III).Search in Google Scholar

25. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.Search in Google Scholar

26. Von Hannover v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights, 2004, no. 59320/00.Search in Google Scholar

27. Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2). European Court of Human Rights, 2012, nos. 40660/08; 60641/08.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo