[1. Agamben, Giorgio. “Absolute Immanence”: 220-239. In: idem. Potentialities. Ed., trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Agamben, Giorgio. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2005.10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Agamben, Giorgio. The Open: Man and Animal. Trans. Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Benjamin, Walter. “Theologico-Political Fragment”: 312-313. In: idem. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. Ed. Peter Demetz. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken Books, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Berkmanas, Tomas. “Images of the Crown: Depersonified Governmentalities, a New Multitude, and Primitive Thinking”: 113-141. In: Leonidas Donskis and J.D. Mininger, eds. Politics Otherwise; Shakespeare as Social and Political Critique. Value Inquiry Books Series. A Volume in Philosophy, Literature, and Politics. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language”: 60-81. In: A.J. Ayer, ed. Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press, 1959.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Derrida, Jacques. Politics of Friendship. Trans. George Collins. London, New York: Verso, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method. London: Verso, 1975.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Gray, John. Straw Dogs; Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals. London: Granta Books, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hayek, F. A. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London & New York: Routledge, 2013.10.4324/9781315887685]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Heidegger, Martin. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: HarperCollins Publisher, Inc., 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Heidegger, Martin. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finititude, Solitude. Trans. William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Trans. Max Knight. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kress, Gunther, and Robert Hodge. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Loughlin, Martin. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274727.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Neilson, Brett. “Potenza Nuda? Sovereignty, Biopolitics, Capitalism.” Contretemps No. 5 (2004): 63-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Newton, Isaac. “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy.” In: Robert Maynard Hutchins, ed. Great Books of the Western World. Chicago, London, Toronto: William Benton, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1952.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Popper, Karl Raimund. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York, 1965.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy. Ed., trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2004.10.1215/9780822385769]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2005.10.7208/chicago/9780226738901.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Trans. George Schwab. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Virno, Paolo. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. Trans. Isabella Bertoletti, James Cascaito, Andrea Casson. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. Brian McGuinness & David Pears. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. ]Search in Google Scholar
