Is the Czech Republic on its Way to Semi-Presidentialism?

1. Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

2. Checkel, Jeffrey T. “Process Tracing”: 114-127. In: Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash, eds. Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cheibub, José Antonio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511813344Search in Google Scholar

4. Cheibub, José Antonio, Zachary Elins, and Tom Ginsburg. “Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science Vol. 44, No. 3 (2014): 515-544 // DOI: 10.1017/S000712341300032X.10.1017/S000712341300032XSearch in Google Scholar

5. Duverger, Maurice. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential”: 142-149. In: Arend Lijphart, ed. Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

6. Elgie, Robert, and Sophia Moestrup, eds. Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.10.4324/9780203954294Search in Google Scholar

7. Elgie, Robert. “Semi-presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice”: 1-20. In: Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup, and Yu-Shan Wu, eds. Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

8. Elgie, Robert. “The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism”: 1-21. In: Robert Elgie, ed. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

9. Franko, Tomáš, Eva Nováčková, and Jakub Šedo. “Nominace kandidátů, průběh a výsledky voleb”: 37-51. In: Jakub Šedo, ed. České prezidentské volby v roce 2013. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Havlík, Vlastimil, and Vít Hloušek. “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: The Story of the Populist Public Affairs Party in the Czech Republic.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society Vol. 15, No. 4(2014): 552-570 // DOI: 10.1080/15705854.2014.945254.10.1080/15705854.2014.945254Search in Google Scholar

11. Havlík, Vlastimil. “Česká republika”: 39-90. In: Stanislav Balík and Vlastimil Havlík, eds. Koaliční vládnutí ve střední Evropě (1990-2010). Brno: muni press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kopeček, Lubomír, and Josef Mlejnek. “Different Confessions, Same Sins? Václav Havel and Václav Klaus as Czech Presidents”: 31-75. In: Vít Hloušek, ed. Presidents above parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Brno: muni press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kopeček, Lubomír, and Vít Hloušek. “Caretaker Governments in Czech Politics: What to do about a Government Crisis.” Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 66 (2014) [forthcoming] // DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941700.10.1080/09668136.2014.941700Search in Google Scholar

14. Krašovec, Alenka, and Damjan Lajh. “The Chameleonic Character of the Slovenian Presidents of the Republic”: 143-165. In: Vít Hloušek, ed. Presidents above parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Brno: muni press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

15. Krouwel, André. “Measuring presidentialism of Central and Eastern European Countries.” Working Papers Political Science (Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit) No. 02/2003: 1-22 // http://www.fsw.vu.nl/en/Images/Globalisation,%20Neoliberalism%20and%20the%20Employment%20Question_tcm31-42728.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kysela, Jan, and Zdeněk Kühn. “Presidential Elements in Government: The Czech Republic.” European Constitutional Law Review Vol. 3, No. 1 (2007): 91-113 // DOI: 10.1017/S1574019607000910.10.1017/S1574019607000910Search in Google Scholar

17. Mahoney, James. “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies Vol. 40, No. 2 (2007): 122-144 // DOI: 10.1177/0010414006296345.10.1177/0010414006296345Search in Google Scholar

18. Millard, Frances. “Presidents and Democratization in Poland: The Roles of Lech Wałęsa and Aleksander Kwaśniewski in Building a New Polity.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics Vol. 16, No. 3 (2000): 39-62 // DOI: 10.1080/13523270008415440.10.1080/13523270008415440Search in Google Scholar

19. Musilová, Markéta, and Jakub Šedo. “Diskuse o zavedení přímé volby prezidenta v České republice a její schválení”: 9-35. In: Jakub Šedo, ed. České prezidentské volby v roce 2013. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work.” European Journal of Political Research Vol. 31, No. 1 (1997): 128-137 // DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00309.10.1111/1475-6765.00309Search in Google Scholar

21. Sartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review Vol. 64, No. 4 (1970): 1033-1053 // DOI: 10.2307/1958356.10.2307/1958356Search in Google Scholar

22. Sartori, Giovanni, Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

23. Sedelius, Thomas, and Sten Berglund. “Towards Presidential Rule in Ukraine: Hybrid regime Dynamics under Semi-Presidentialism.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics Vol. 5, No. 1 (2012): 20-45 // DOI: 10.2478/v10076-012-0002-2.10.2478/v10076-012-0002-2Search in Google Scholar

24. Siaroff, Alan. “Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction.” European Journal of Political Research Vol. 42, No. 3 (2003): 287-312 // DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00084.10.1111/1475-6765.00084Search in Google Scholar

25. Tavits, Margit. Presidents with Prime Ministers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553327.001.0001Search in Google Scholar