[Chmura D. 2004. Penetration and naturalisation of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 60: 3-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deckers B., Verheyen K., Vanhellemont M., Maddens E., Muys B. & Hermy M. 2008. Impact of avian frugivores on dispersal and recruitment of the invasive Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape. Biol. Invasions 10: 717-727.10.1007/s10530-007-9164-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Dormann C. F. 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 129-138.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00279.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Faliński J. B. 1968. Stadia neofityzmu i stosunek neofitów do innych komponentów zbiorowiska. Mater. Zakł. Fitosoc. Stos. Uniw. Warszawskiego 25: 15-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halarewicz A. 2011a. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) na siedliskach borowych. Sylwan 155(8): 530-534.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halarewicz A. 2011b. Przyczyny i skutki inwazji czeremchy amerykańskiej Prunus serotina w ekosystemach leśnych. Leśne Pr. Bad. 72(3): 267-272.10.2478/v10111-011-0026-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Hastings A., Cuddington K., Davies K. F., Dugaw C. J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A., Harrison S., Holland M., Lambrinos J., Malvadkar U., Melbourne B. A., Moore K., Taylor C. & Thomson D. 2005. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Letters 8: 91-101.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Higgins S. I. & Richardson D. M. 1996. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecol. Model. 87(1-3): 249-265.10.1016/0304-3800(95)00022-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackowiak B. 1998. Struktura przestrzenna flory dużego miasta. Studium metodyczno-problemowe. Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin UAM w Poznaniu 8: 1-227. Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Křivánek M., Pyšek P. & Jarošík V. 2006. Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv. Biol. 20(5): 1487-1498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nathan A. & Muller-Landau H. C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Tree 15(7): 278-285.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearson R. G. & Dawson T. P. 2005. Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change. Biol. Conserv. 123(3): 389-401.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pyšek P., Jarošik V. & Kučera T. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 104: 13-24.10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00150-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson D. M. & Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invisibility. Prog. Phys. Geog. 30(3): 409-431.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rouget M. & Richardson D. M. 2003. Understanding patterns of plant invasion at different spatial scales: quantifying the roles of environment and propagule pressure. In: L. E. Child, J. H. Brock, G. Brundu, K. Prach, P. Pyšek, P. M. Wade & M. Williamson (eds.). Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions, pp. 3-15. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sebert-Cuvillier E., Simon-Goyheneche V., Paccaut F., Chabrerie O., Goubet O. & Decocq G. 2008. Spatial spread of an alien tree species in a heterogeneous forest landscape: a spatially realistic simulation model. Landscape Ecol. 23: 787-801.10.1007/s10980-008-9237-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Stypiński P. 1977. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.) w lasach na Pojezierzu Mazurskim. Sylwan 121(10): 47-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thiele J. & Otte A. 2008. Invasion patterns of Heracleum mantegazzianum in Germany on the regional and landscape scales. J. Nat. Conserv. 16(2): 61-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thuiller W., Alberta C., Araújob M. B., Berryc P. M., Cabezad M., Guisane A., Hic klerf T., Mid gleyg G. F., Patersonc J., Schurrh F. M., Sykesf M. T. & Zimmermanni N. E. 2008. Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 9(3-4): 137-152.10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilman D. & Kareiva P. M. 1997. Spatial ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. 368 pp. Princeton University Press, Ptrinceton.10.1515/9780691188362]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005. The Establishment and Spread of Alien Plant Species (Kenophytes) in the Flora of Poland. Prace naukowe Uniw. Śląskiego w Katowicach 2372: 1-192.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W. & Hołdyński C. 2012. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. 197 pp. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[With K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv. Biol. 16(5): 1192-1203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wołkowycki D. 2004. The influence of some features of the landscape structure on the flora of alien woody species. Ecol. Questions 4: 133-140.]Search in Google Scholar