Acceso abierto

Spatial expansion pattern of black cherry Padus serotina Ehrh. in suburban zone of Białystok (NE Poland)


Cite

Chmura D. 2004. Penetration and naturalisation of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 60: 3-11.Search in Google Scholar

Deckers B., Verheyen K., Vanhellemont M., Maddens E., Muys B. & Hermy M. 2008. Impact of avian frugivores on dispersal and recruitment of the invasive Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape. Biol. Invasions 10: 717-727.10.1007/s10530-007-9164-3Search in Google Scholar

Dormann C. F. 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 129-138.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00279.xSearch in Google Scholar

Faliński J. B. 1968. Stadia neofityzmu i stosunek neofitów do innych komponentów zbiorowiska. Mater. Zakł. Fitosoc. Stos. Uniw. Warszawskiego 25: 15-23.Search in Google Scholar

Halarewicz A. 2011a. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) na siedliskach borowych. Sylwan 155(8): 530-534.Search in Google Scholar

Halarewicz A. 2011b. Przyczyny i skutki inwazji czeremchy amerykańskiej Prunus serotina w ekosystemach leśnych. Leśne Pr. Bad. 72(3): 267-272.10.2478/v10111-011-0026-5Search in Google Scholar

Hastings A., Cuddington K., Davies K. F., Dugaw C. J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A., Harrison S., Holland M., Lambrinos J., Malvadkar U., Melbourne B. A., Moore K., Taylor C. & Thomson D. 2005. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Letters 8: 91-101.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.xSearch in Google Scholar

Higgins S. I. & Richardson D. M. 1996. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecol. Model. 87(1-3): 249-265.10.1016/0304-3800(95)00022-4Search in Google Scholar

Jackowiak B. 1998. Struktura przestrzenna flory dużego miasta. Studium metodyczno-problemowe. Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin UAM w Poznaniu 8: 1-227. Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań.Search in Google Scholar

Křivánek M., Pyšek P. & Jarošík V. 2006. Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv. Biol. 20(5): 1487-1498.Search in Google Scholar

Nathan A. & Muller-Landau H. C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Tree 15(7): 278-285.Search in Google Scholar

Pearson R. G. & Dawson T. P. 2005. Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change. Biol. Conserv. 123(3): 389-401.Search in Google Scholar

Pyšek P., Jarošik V. & Kučera T. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 104: 13-24.10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00150-1Search in Google Scholar

Richardson D. M. & Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invisibility. Prog. Phys. Geog. 30(3): 409-431.Search in Google Scholar

Rouget M. & Richardson D. M. 2003. Understanding patterns of plant invasion at different spatial scales: quantifying the roles of environment and propagule pressure. In: L. E. Child, J. H. Brock, G. Brundu, K. Prach, P. Pyšek, P. M. Wade & M. Williamson (eds.). Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions, pp. 3-15. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Search in Google Scholar

Sebert-Cuvillier E., Simon-Goyheneche V., Paccaut F., Chabrerie O., Goubet O. & Decocq G. 2008. Spatial spread of an alien tree species in a heterogeneous forest landscape: a spatially realistic simulation model. Landscape Ecol. 23: 787-801.10.1007/s10980-008-9237-4Search in Google Scholar

Stypiński P. 1977. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.) w lasach na Pojezierzu Mazurskim. Sylwan 121(10): 47-57.Search in Google Scholar

Thiele J. & Otte A. 2008. Invasion patterns of Heracleum mantegazzianum in Germany on the regional and landscape scales. J. Nat. Conserv. 16(2): 61-71.Search in Google Scholar

Thuiller W., Alberta C., Araújob M. B., Berryc P. M., Cabezad M., Guisane A., Hic klerf T., Mid gleyg G. F., Patersonc J., Schurrh F. M., Sykesf M. T. & Zimmermanni N. E. 2008. Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 9(3-4): 137-152.10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Tilman D. & Kareiva P. M. 1997. Spatial ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. 368 pp. Princeton University Press, Ptrinceton.10.1515/9780691188362Search in Google Scholar

Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005. The Establishment and Spread of Alien Plant Species (Kenophytes) in the Flora of Poland. Prace naukowe Uniw. Śląskiego w Katowicach 2372: 1-192.Search in Google Scholar

Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W. & Hołdyński C. 2012. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. 197 pp. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

With K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv. Biol. 16(5): 1192-1203.Search in Google Scholar

Wołkowycki D. 2004. The influence of some features of the landscape structure on the flora of alien woody species. Ecol. Questions 4: 133-140.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1897-2810
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Life Sciences, Zoology, Ecology