Internal quality evolution of a large test system – an industrial study

[1] A. Chatzigeorgiou, A. Manakos, Investigating the evolution of bad smells in object-oriented code. Proc. 2010 Seventh International Conference on the Qual­ity of Information and Communications Technology, QUATICTO, pp. 106 115, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. IEEE Computer Society. 219. 232, 233, 23610.1109/QUATIC.2010.16Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. E. Conway. How do committees invent?, Datamation, 14,5 (1968) 28-31. <http://www.melconway.com/research/committees.html> [accessed 26-Aug-2015]. ⇒234Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. v. Deursen, L. Moonen, A. v. d. Bergh, G. Kok, Refactoring test code, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes (XP2001), pp. 92-95. University of Cagliari, 2001. ⇒220Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. Fowler, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1999. ⇒218Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Israeli, D. G. Feitelson, The Unux kernel as a case study in software evolution, J. Syst. Softw., 83, 3 (2010) 485-501. ⇒220, 23510.1016/j.jss.2009.09.042Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. Izurieta, J. Bieman, The evolution of freebsd and linux, Proc. 2006 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESEm pp. 204-211, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. ⇒220, 23510.1145/1159733.1159765Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. Johari, A. Kaur, Effect of software evolution on software metrics: An open source case study, SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 36, 5 (2011) 1-8. ⇒220, 23510.1145/2020976.2020987Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. F. Kemerer, S. Slaughter, An empirical approach to studying software evolu­tion, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 25, 4, (1999) 493-509. ⇒220, 23510.1109/32.799945Search in Google Scholar

[9] F. Khomh, M. Di Penta, Y.-G. Gueheneuc, An exploratory study of the impact of code smells on software change-proneness, Proc. 16th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, WCRE’09, pp. 75-84, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society. ⇒21810.1109/WCRE.2009.28Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. J. Lawrence, An examination of evolution dynamics, Proc. 6th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE’82, pp. 188-196, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1982. IEEE Computer Society Press. ⇒219, 235Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. M. Lehman, The programming process, 1969. IBM Research Report RC 2722. ⇒235Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. M. Lehman, Laws of software evolution revisited, Proc. 5th European Work­shop on Software Process Technology, EWSPT ’96, pp. 108-124. London, UK, UK, 1996, Springer-Verlag. ⇒23510.1007/BFb0017737Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. M. Lehman, Feast/2 final report grant number gr/m44101, 2001. ⇒ 220, 235Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. M. Lehman, J. F. Ramil, Towards a theory of software evolution - and its practical impact (working paper), Proc. IntL Symposium on Principles of Softw. Evolution (invited talk). ISPSE 2000, 1-2 Nov, pp. 2 11. Press, 2000. ⇒219Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. M. Lehman, J. F. Ramil, Evolution in software and related areas, Proc. 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, IWPSE’01, pages 1-16, New York, NY, USA, 2001, ACM. ⇒219, 23510.1145/602461.602463Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. M. Lehman, J. F. Ramil, Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management, Ann. Softw. Eng., 11, I (2001) 15-44.⇒219, 233, 234, 235Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. M. Lehman, J. F. Ramil, D. E. Perry, On evidence supporting the feast hypothesis and the laws of software evolution, Proc. 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics, METRICS ’98, pp. 84 -, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society. ⇒ 220, 235Search in Google Scholar

[18] I. Macia, J. Garcia, D. Popescu, A. Garcia, N. Medvidovic, A. von Staa, Are automatically-detected code anomalies relevant to architectural modularity?: An exploratory analysis of evolving systems, Proc. Ilth Annual International Con­ference on Aspect-oriented Software Development, AOSD T2. pp. 167 178. New York, NY, USA. 2012, ACM. ⇒21810.1145/2162049.2162069Search in Google Scholar

[19] N. Moha, Y.-G. Gueheneuc, L. Duchien, A.-F. Le Meur, Decor: A method for the specification and detection of code and design smells, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.36, I (2010) 20-36. ⇒21810.1109/TSE.2009.50Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. Moser, P. Abrahamsson, W. Pedrycz, A. Sillitti, G. Succi, A case study on the impact of refactoring on quality and productivity in an agile team, in Balancing Agility and Formalism in Software Engineering, pp. 252 266, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. ⇒21810.1007/978-3-540-85279-7_20Search in Google Scholar

[21] H. Neukirchen, M. Bisanz, Utilising code smells to detect quality problems in ttcn-3 test suites, Proc. 19th IFIP TC6/WG6.1 International Conference, and 7th International Conference on Testing of Software and Communicating Sys­tems, TestCom,07/FATES,07, pp. 228-243, Berlin. Heidelberg. 2007, Springer- Verlag. ⇒21810.1007/978-3-540-73066-8_16Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Olbrich D. S. Cruzes, V. Basili, N. Zazworka, The evolution and impact of code smells: A case study of two open source systems, Proc. 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM ’09, pp. 390 400, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society. ⇒21810.1109/ESEM.2009.5314231Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. L. Parnas, Software aging, Proc. 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’94, pp. 279-287, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1994. IEEE Com­puter Society Press. ⇒ 219Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Peters, A. Zaidman, Evaluating the lifespan of code smells using software repository mining. Proc. 2012 16th European Conference on Software Mainte­nance and Reengineering, CSMR’12, pp. 411-416, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. IEEE Computer Society. 219, 232, 233, 23610.1109/CSMR.2012.79Search in Google Scholar

[25] D. I. K. Sjoberg, A. Yamashita, B. Anda, A. Mockus, T. Dyba, Quantifying the effect of code smells on maintenance effort, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 39, 8 (2013) 1144-1156. ⇒21810.1109/TSE.2012.89Search in Google Scholar

[26] K. Szabados, Structural analysis of large ttcn-3 projects. Proc. 21st IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on Testing of Software and Communication Systems and 9th International FATES Workshop, TESTCOM ’09/FATES ’09, pp. 241 246, Berlin. Heidelberg, 2009, Springer-Verlag. ⇒217, 220, 236Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Szabados, Titanium, <https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/titan>, 2015. [On­line; accessed 26-Aug-2015]. ⇒221Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Szabados, A. Kovács, Advanced ttcn-3 test suite validation with titan, Proc. 9th Conference on Applied Informatics, pp. 273-281, 2014. ⇒217, 236Search in Google Scholar

[29] K. Szabados, A. Kovács, Test software quality issues and connections to interna­tional standards, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Informatica, 5, I (2014) 77 102. ⇒217, 220, 23610.2478/ausi-2014-0006Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Szabados and A. Kovács, Up-to-date list of code smells, <http://compalg>. inf.eltG.hu/~attila/TestingAtScale.htm, 2015. [Online; accessed 26-Aug- 2015]. ⇒220,224,225Search in Google Scholar

[31] C. Taube-Schock, R. J. Walker, I. H. Witten, Can we avoid high coupling?, Proc. 25th European Conference on Objectoriented Programming, ECOOPTI, pp. 204 228, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, Springer-Verlag. ⇒22010.1007/978-3-642-22655-7_10Search in Google Scholar

[32] W. M. Turski, The reference model for smooth growth of software systems re­visited, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 28, 8, (2002) 814-815. ⇒220, 23510.1109/TSE.2002.1027802Search in Google Scholar

[33] E. Van Emden, L. Moonen, Java quality assurance by detecting code smells, Proc. Ninth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE’02) pp. 97 106, Washington, DC, USA, 2002. IEEE Computer Society. ⇒218Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Yamashita, L. Moonen, Do code smells reflect important maintainability as­pects?, Proc. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM T2, pp. 306-315.Washington, DC, USA, 2012. IEEE Computer Society. ⇒219, 23610.1109/ICSM.2012.6405287Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. Yamashita, L. Moonen, Do developers care about code smells? an exploratory survey, Proc. 20th Working Conference on Conference: Reverse Engineering, pp. 242 251. IEEE Computer Society, 2013. ⇒219, 232, 233, 23610.1109/WCRE.2013.6671299Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Yamashita, L. Moonen, Exploring the impact of inter-smell relations on soft­ware maintainability: An empirical study, Proc. 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, IC1SE *13, pp. 682 691, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013. IEEE Computer Society Press. ⇒219, 23610.1109/ICSE.2013.6606614Search in Google Scholar

[37] A. Yamashita, L. Moonen, To what extent can maintenance problems be predicted by code smell detection? - an empirical study, Inf. Softw. Technoi., 55, 12 (2013) 2223-2242. ⇒21810.1016/j.infsof.2013.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. Zaidman, B. Rompaey, A. Deursen5 S. Demeyer, Studying the co-evolution of production and test code in open source and industrial developer test processes through repository mining, Empirical Softw. Engg., 16, 3 (2011) 325-364. ⇒ 22010.1007/s10664-010-9143-7Search in Google Scholar

[39] B. ZeiC5 D. Vega5 I. Scheferdecker5 H. Neukirchen5 J. Grabowski5 Applying the ISO 9126 Quality Model to Test Specifications Exemplified for TTCN-3 Test Specifications, Software Engineering 2007. Lecture Notes in Informatics. Copy­right Gesellschaft für Informatik5 Mar. 2007. ⇒ 220 Search in Google Scholar