Acceso abierto

Education for Entrepreneurship – A Challenge for School Practice


Cite

Blaumeiser, H. (1996). Interpretative Methoden. In H. Hierdeis & T. Hug, Taschenbuch der Pädagogik (616-633). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. Entrepreneurship in education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/entrepreneurship_enSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2016). Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

European Council. (2015). Council conclusions on entrepreneurship in education and training. EUR-Lex. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015XG0120(01)Search in Google Scholar

Franks, A., & Meteyard, J. (2007). Liminality: the transforming grace of in-between places. Pastoral Care Counsel, 61(3), 215-22.10.1177/154230500706100306Search in Google Scholar

Gennep, A., van. (1997). Přechodové rituály. Systematické studium rituálů. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Search in Google Scholar

Goins, J. (2013). The in-between: Embracing the tension between now and the next big thing. Chicago: Moody Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, M. (2005). “But Peter’s in it for the money” - the liminality of entrepreneurial scientists. VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 18(1-2),49-75.Search in Google Scholar

Hanover Research. (2011). A Crosswalk of 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://www.hanoverresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/A-Crosswalk-of-21st-Century-Skills-Membership.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Jůvová, A. et al. (2015). Reflection of Constructivist Theories in Current Educational Practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(5), 345-349. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2015.030506Search in Google Scholar

Jůvová, A. (2017). The Guerrilla Literacy Learners Project: Development of literacies through informal learning, Acta Educationis Generalis, 7(1), 82-92. doi: 10.1515/atd-2017-0005Search in Google Scholar

Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). Základy výzkumu chování. Praha: Academia.Search in Google Scholar

Malach, J. (2008). Výchova k podnikavosti a vysoké školy. Aula, 16(2), 41-62.Search in Google Scholar

Malach, J. (Ed.). (2007). Teach&ESPRIT. Rozvoj podnikavosti v přípravě učitelů odborného vzdělávání v evropských zemích. Příručka a materiály. Ostrava: PdF OU.Search in Google Scholar

Marešová, H., Rudolf, J., & Hladík, T. (2014). Výchova k podnikavosti. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. (1993). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Neumajer, O. (2014). Inovativní výukové aktivity pro rozvoj dovedností pro 21. století. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta.Search in Google Scholar

Oxbridge Academy. Debate. Benefits of Speech & Debate. Retrieved from https://www.oapb.org/student-life/academic-teams-clubs-activities/debateSearch in Google Scholar

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap: Why Even Our Best Schools Don’t Teach the New Survival Skills Our Children Need-and What We Can Do About It. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2585-7444
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
3 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Social Sciences, Education, Theory and History of Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other, Social Pedagogy, Social Work