[ALAKUKKU, L. – ELONEN, P. 1995. Long-term effects of a single compaction by heavy field traffic on yield and nitrogen uptake of annual crops. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 36, no. 3–4, pp. 141–152.]Search in Google Scholar
[ANTILLE, D. L. – CHAMEN, W. C. T. – TULLBERG, J. N. – LAL, R. 2015. The potential of controlled traffic farming to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon sequestration in arable land: a critical review. In Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 707–731.]Search in Google Scholar
[BENNETT, J. MCL. – WOODHOUSE, N. P. – KELLER, T. – JENSEN, T. A. – ANTILLE, D. L. 2015. Advances in cotton harvesting technology: a review and implications for the John Deere round baler cotton picker. In Journal of Cotton Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 225–249.]Search in Google Scholar
[BLACKWELL, P. – HAGAN, J. – DAVIES, S. – RIETHMULLER, G. – BAKKER, D. – HALL, D. – KNIGHT, Q. – LEMON, J. – YOKWE, S. – ISBISTER, B. 2013. Pathways to more grain farming profit by controlled traffic farming in WA. 2013 WA Crop Updates. Barton, ACT, Australia : Grains Research and Development Corporation.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOCHTIS, D. D. – SØRENSEN, C. G. – GREEN, O. – MOSHOU, D. – OLESEN, J. 2010. Effect of controlled traffic on field efficiency. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 14–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOTTA, G. F. – POZZOLO, O. – BOMBEN, M. – ROSATTO, H. – RIVERO, D. – RESSIA, M. – TOURN, M. – SOZA, E. – VAZQUEZ, J. 2007. Traffic alternatives for harvesting soybean (Glycine max L.): Effect on yields and soil under a direct sowing system. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 96, no. 1–2, pp. 145–154.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURT, E. C. – REEVES, D. W. – RAPER, R. L. 1994. Energy utilization as affected by traffic in a conventional and conservation tillage system. In Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 759–762.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. 2006. Controlled traffic farming: literature review and appraisal of potential use in the U.K. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Research Review N. 59. Kenilworth, U.K. : Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. 2011. The effects of low and controlled traffic systems on soil physical properties, yields and the profitability of cereal crops on a range of soil types. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cranfield, U.K. : Cranfield University.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, T. 2015. Controlled traffic farming – from worldwide research to adoption in Europe and its future prospects. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 64–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAMEN, W. C. T. – MOXEY, A. P. – TOWERS, W. – BALANA, B. – HALLETT, P. D. 2015. Mitigating arable soil compaction: a review and analysis of available cost and benefit data. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 146, PA, pp. 10–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[DÍAZ-ZORITA, M. – DUARTE, G. A. – GROVE, J. H. 2002. A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Pampas of Argentina. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAOSTAT. 2015. Country profile – Argentina: economic indicators. Retrieved from: http://faostat.fao.org/CountryProfiles/Country_Profile/Direct.aspx?lang=en&area=9. Accessed 01 July 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRIEDRICH, T. – DERPSCH, R. – KASSAM, A. 2012. Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Report, 6 (1 SPL).]Search in Google Scholar
[GASSO, V. – SØRENSEN, C. A. G. – OUDSHOORN, F. W. – GREEN, O. 2013. Controlled traffic farming: a review of the environmental impacts. In European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 48, pp. 66–73.]Search in Google Scholar
[GODWIN, R. J. 2015. Potential of “no-till” systems for arable farming. Report to the Worshipful Company of Farmers, 44 pp. Newport, Shropshire, U.K. : Soil and Water Management Centre, Harper Adams University. Retrieved from: https://cdn.harper-adams.ac.uk/document/project/Potential-of-No-till-Systems-for-Arable-Farming-Report.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[GODWIN, R. – MISIEWICZ, P. – WHITE, D. – SMITH, E. – CHAMEN, T. – GALAMBOŠOVÁ, J. – STOBART, R. 2015. Results from recent traffic systems research and the implications for future work. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 57–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[IMHOFF, S. C. 2015. Proyecto PIP: Tránsito controlado de la maquinaria: efecto sobre las propiedades del suelo y los cultivos en las zonas contiguas a las sendas de circulación. Personal communication. Esperanza, Argentina : Universidad Nacional del Litoral.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISBISTER, B. – BLACKWELL, P. – RIETHMULLER, G. – DAVIES, S. – WHITLOCK, A. – NEALE, T. 2013. Controlled traffic farming technical manual. WA, Australia : Northern Agricultural Catchments Council. Retrieved from: http://nacc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/NACC_Controlled_Traffic_Farming_Technical_Manual.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[KASSAM, A. – FRIEDRICH, T. – SHAXSON, F. – PRETTY, J. 2009. The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. In International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 292–320.]Search in Google Scholar
[KELLER, T. – ARVIDSSON, J. 2004. Technical solutions to reduce the risk of subsoil compaction: effects of dual wheels, tandem wheels and tyre inflation pressure on stress propagation in soil. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 191–205.]Search in Google Scholar
[KELLER, T. – DÉFOSSEZ, P. – WEISSKOPF, P. – ARVIDSSON, J. – RICHARD, G. 2007. SoilFlex: A model for prediction of soil stresses and soil compaction due to agricultural field traffic including a synthesis of analytical approaches. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 391–411.]Search in Google Scholar
[KINGWELL, R. – FUCHSBICHLER, A. 2011. The whole-farm benefits of controlled traffic farming: an Australian appraisal. In Agricultural Systems, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 513–521.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOOLEN, A. J. – LERINK, P. – KURSTJENS, D. A. G. – VAN DEN AKKER, J. J. H. – ARTS, W. B. M. 1992. Prediction of aspects of soil-wheel systems. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 24, pp. 381–396.]Search in Google Scholar
[KROULÍK, M. – KUMHÁLA, F. – HŮLA, J. – HONZÍK, I. 2009. The evaluation of agricultural machines field trafficking intensity for different soil tillage technologies. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 171–175.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUTZBACH, H. D. 2000. Trends in power and machinery. In Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 237–247.]Search in Google Scholar
[LENCE, S. H. 2010. Chapter 14. The agricultural sector in Argentina: major trends and recent developments. In Alston, J. – Babcock, B. – Pardey, P. (Eds). The Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide. Ames, Iowa : Midwest Agribusiness Trade and Research Information Center, Iowa State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, Y. – TULLBERG, J. N. – FREEBAIRN, D. M. 2001. Traffic and residue cover effects on infiltration. In Soil Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 239–247.]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, Y. X. – TULLBERG, J. N. – FREEBAIRN, D. M. 2007. Wheel traffic and tillage effects on runoff and crop yield. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 282–292.]Search in Google Scholar
[LI, Y. X. – TULLBERG, J. N. – FREEBAIRN, D. M. – MCLAUGHLIN, N. B. – LI, H. W. 2008. Effects of tillage and traffic on crop production in dryland farming systems: II. Long-term simulation of crop production using the PERFECT model. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 100, no. 1–2, pp. 25–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[LIPIEC, J. – STĘPNIEWSKI, W. 1995. Effects of soil compaction and tillage systems on uptake and losses of nutrients. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 35, no. 1–2, pp. 37–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOGSDON, S. D. – ALLMARAS, R. R. – NELSON, W. W. – VOORHEES, W. B. 1992. Persistence of subsoil compaction from heavy axle loads. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 23, no. 1–2, pp. 95–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[MANUEL-NAVARRETE, D. – GALLOPÍN, G. C. – BLANCO, M. – DÍAZZORITA, M. – FERRARO, D. O. – HERZER, H. – LATERRA, P. – MURMIS, M. R. – PODESTÁ, G. P. – RABINOVICH, J. – SATORRE, E. H. – TORRES, F. – VIGLIZZO, E. F. 2009. Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: the case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 621–638.]Search in Google Scholar
[MAŠEK, J. – KROULÍK, M. – CHYBA, J. – NOVÁK, P. – KUMHÁLA, F. 2014. Traffic intensity in fields and technical possibilities for reduction of machinery passes. In Engineering for Rural Development, vol. 13, pp. 216–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCHUGH, A. D. – TULLBERG, J. N. – FREEBAIRN, D. M. 2009. Controlled traffic farming restores soil structure. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 164–172.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPHEE, J. E. – BRAUNACK, M. V. – GARSIDE, A. L. – REID, D. J. – HILTON, D. J. 1995. Controlled traffic for irrigated double cropping in a semi-arid tropical environment: Part 1, Machinery requirements and modifications. In Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 60, pp. 175–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPHEE, J. E. – NEALE, T. – AIRD, P. L. 2013. Controlled traffic for vegetable production: Part 2. Layout considerations in a complex topography. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 171–178.]Search in Google Scholar
[MISIEWICZ, P. A. – BLACKBURN, K. – RICHARDS, T. E. – BRIGHTON, J. L. – GODWIN, R. J. 2015. The evaluation and calibration of pressure mapping system for the measurement of the pressure distribution of agricultural tyres. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 130, pp. 81–91.]Search in Google Scholar
[NEALE, T. 2011. The cost of grain harvester compaction. Precision Agriculture, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.precisionagriculture.com.au/news-and-articles.php. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[RADFORD, B. J. – YULE, D. F. – MCGARRY, D. – PLAYFORD, C. 2001. Crop responses to applied soil compaction and to compaction repair treatments. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 61, pp. 157–166.]Search in Google Scholar
[RADFORD, B. J. – YULE, D. F. – MCGARRY, D. – PLAYFORD, C. 2007. Amelioration of soil compaction can take 5 years on a Vertisol under no till in the semi-arid subtropics. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 249–255.]Search in Google Scholar
[RATAJ, V. – GALAMBOŠOVÁ, J. – VAŠEK, M. 2013. Determining the guidance system accuracy with the support of a large GNSS dataset. In Research in Agricultural Engineering, vol. 59, pp. S65–S70.]Search in Google Scholar
[RUSER, R. – FLESSA, H. – RUSSOW, R. – SCHMIDT, G. – BUEGGER, F. – MUNCH, J. C. 2006. Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting. In Soil Biology Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 263–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[SADS. 2015. Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nacion (2015): Programa de Acción Nacional de Lucha Contra la Desertificación-PAN. Sección 5.4: Ley No. 22.428 de Fomento a la Conservación de Suelos. Retrieved from: http://www.ambiente.gob.ar/?idarticulo=610. Accessed 30 June 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIIA. 2015. Sistema Integrado de Información Agropecuaria (2015): Series temporales. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca de la República Argentina. Retrieved from: http://www.siia.gov.ar/series. Accessed 30 June 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, E. K. – MISIEWICZ, P. A. – GIRARDELLO, V. – ARSLAN, S. – CHANEY, K. – WHITE, D. R. – GODWIN, R. J. 2014. Effects of traffic and tillage on crop yield (winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.) and the physical properties of a sandy loam soil. ASABE Paper No. 14-1912652. St. Joseph, Mich. : ASABE.]Search in Google Scholar
[SOANE, B. D. – VAN OUWERKERK, C. 1995. Implications of soil compaction in crop production for the quality of the environment. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 35, no. 1–2, pp. 5–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPOOR, G. – TIJINK, F. G. J. – WEISSKOPF, P. 2003. Subsoil compaction: risk, avoidance, identification and alleviation. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 73, no. 1–2, pp. 175–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[TITMARSH, G. – WATERS, D. – WILSON, A. – WOCKNER, G. – BURGIS, M. – CONNOLLY, R. 2003. Experiences in runoff and erosion of controlled traffic farming systems, southern Queensland. In Proc. 16th Triennial Conf., International Soil and Tillage Research Organisation. Brisbane, Australia : ISTRO, pp. 1235–1240.]Search in Google Scholar
[TULLBERG, J. 2010. Tillage, traffic and sustainability – A challenge for ISTRO. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 26–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[TULLBERG, J. – MCHUGH, A. D. – KHABBAZ, B. G. – SCHEER, C. – GRACE P. 2011. Controlled traffic/permanent bed farming reduces GHG emissions. In Proc. 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture 2011: Resilient Food Systems for a Changing World. Canberra, Australia : Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[TULLBERG, J. N. 2000. Wheel traffic effects on tillage draught. In Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 375–382.]Search in Google Scholar
[TULLBERG, J. N. – YULE, D. F. – MCGARRY, D. 2007. Controlled traffic farming – From research to adoption in Australia. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 272–281.]Search in Google Scholar
[TULLBERG, J. N. – ZIEBARTH, P. J. – LI, Y. X. 2001. Tillage and traffic effects on runoff. In Soil Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 249–257.]Search in Google Scholar
