Case Report. Practical Advantages of CBCT in the Surgical Treatment of Impacted Lower Third Molar

1. Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;95(3):267-76.10.1177/002203451561585726561441Search in Google Scholar

2. Huang GJ, Cunha-Cruz J, Rothen M, Spiekerman C, Drangsholt M, Anderson L, Roset GA. A Prospective Study of Clinical Outcomes Related to Third Molar Removal or Retention. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(4):728-234.10.2105/AJPH.2013.301649402569924524521Search in Google Scholar

3. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, The Management of Impacted Third Molar Teeth, 2013Search in Google Scholar

4. Chandak S, Shetty CM - Comparative Study of Dentascan and Radiography for Radiological Evaluation of Impacted Teeth, J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): RC01-RC05.10.7860/JCDR/2014/7997.4618414912625177620Search in Google Scholar

5. Sansare K, Khanna V, Karjodkar - Early Victims of X-rays: a Tribute and Current Perception, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011, 40(2): 123-125.10.1259/dmfr/73488299352029821239576Search in Google Scholar

6. Miles DA - Metoda Imagistică cu Fascicul Conic - “De ce Atâta Agitaţie în Legătură cu Doza de Radiaţii?”, Revista de Imagistică Dentară, 2010, 2: 14-22.Search in Google Scholar

7. Matzen LH, Wenzel A - Efficacy of CBCT for Assessment of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: a Review - Based on a Hierarchical model of evidence, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2015, 44(1): 20140189.10.1259/dmfr.20140189427743725135317Search in Google Scholar

8. Gonzalez SM - Interpretation Basics of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Wiley Blackwell, Iowa, 2014, 16-22.10.1002/9781119421177Search in Google Scholar

9. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1030-37.10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.02016781335Search in Google Scholar

10. Atieh MA. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:74-82.10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.07420006158Search in Google Scholar

11. Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, Tennant M. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral maxillofacial surgeons. Aust Dent J. 2006;51:64-68.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00403.x16669480Search in Google Scholar

12. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstruction to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1678-1685.10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.03218634957Search in Google Scholar

13. Dodson TB. Role of computerized tomography in management of impacted mandibular third molars. N Y State Dent J. 2005 NovSearch in Google Scholar

14. Bell GW. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:21-2710.1016/S0266-4356(03)00186-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:3-7.10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.21715635549Search in Google Scholar

16. Tuzi A, Di Bari R, Cicconetti A. 3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jul-Dec; 3(3-4): 123-131.Search in Google Scholar

17. Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1212-121810.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01736.x19719735Search in Google Scholar

18. Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Comparison of cone beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol End. 2008;105:633-42.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.04118299225Search in Google Scholar

19. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Review. Clin Oral Invest. 2008;12:291-30210.1007/s00784-008-0200-118446390Search in Google Scholar

20. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:83-88.10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.05217174769Search in Google Scholar

21. Suomalainen A, Esmaeili EP, Robinson S - Dentomaxillofacial Imaging with Panoramic Views and Cone Beam CT, Insights Imaging, 2015, 6(1): 1-16.10.1007/s13244-014-0379-4433023725575868Search in Google Scholar

22. Pippi R. A case of inferior alveolar entrapment in the roots of a partially erupted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1170-1173. 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.00720185220Search in Google Scholar