A belief revision approach for argumentation-based negotiation agents

Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2): 510-530.10.2307/2274239Search in Google Scholar

Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y. and Moraitis, P. (2007). A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation, 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), Honolulu, HI, USA, p. 158.Search in Google Scholar

Amgoud, L., Parsons, S. and Maudet, N. (2000). Arguments, dialogue and negotiation, inW. Horn (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), IOS Press, Berlin, pp. 338-342.Search in Google Scholar

Amgoud, L. and Vesic, S. (2011). A formal analysis of the outcomes of argumentation-based negotiations, 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1237-1238.Search in Google Scholar

Bonanno, G., Delgrande, J., Lang, J. and Rott, H. (2009). Special issue on formal models of belief change in rational agents, Journal of Applied Logic 7(4): 363.10.1016/j.jal.2009.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Dix, J., Hansson, S.O., Kern-Isberner, G. and Simari, G.R. (2013). Belief change and argumentation in multi-agent scenarios (Dagstuhl seminar 13231), Dagstuhl Reports 3(6): 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

Dung, P.M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77(2): 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-XSearch in Google Scholar

Falappa, M., Garcia, A., Kern-Isberner, G. and Simari, G. (2011). On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation, Knowledge Engineering Review 26(1): 35-43.10.1017/S0269888910000391Search in Google Scholar

Fermé, E., Saez, K. and Sanz, P. (2003). Multiple kernel contraction, Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic 73(2): 183-195.10.1023/A:1022927828817Search in Google Scholar

Hansson, S. (1994). Kernel contraction, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 59(3): 845-859.10.2307/2275912Search in Google Scholar

Hansson, S. (1999). A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Applied Logic Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-007-0814-3Search in Google Scholar

Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Wooldridge, M. (2001). Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges, International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199-215.10.1023/A:1008746126376Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, S., Sycara, K. and Evenchik, A. (1998). Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2): 1-69.10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Jennings, N.R. (1998). Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3): 261-292.10.1093/logcom/8.3.261Search in Google Scholar

Pasquier, P., Hollands, R., Rahwan, I., Dignum, F. and Sonenberg, L. (2011). An empirical study of interest-based negotiation, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 22(2): 249-288.10.1007/s10458-010-9125-6Search in Google Scholar

Pilotti, P., Casali, A. and Chesñevar, C. (2014). Incorporating object features in collaborative argumentation-based negotiation agents, Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)/Encontro Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil, pp. 31-37.Search in Google Scholar

Rahwan, I., Pasquier, P., Sonenberg, L. and Dignum, F. (2007). On the benefits of exploiting underlying goals in argument-based negotiation, 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 116-121.Search in Google Scholar

Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Mcburney, P., Parsons, S. and Sonenberg, L. (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Argumentation-based negotiation, Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4): 343-375.10.1017/S0269888904000098Search in Google Scholar

Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R. and Sierra, C. (2003).Search in Google Scholar

Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach, Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 9-17.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenschein, J.S. and Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Sadri, F., Toni, F. and Torroni, P. (2001). Logic agents, dialogues and negotiation: An abductive approach, Proceedings of the AISB’01 Convention, York, UK, pp. 5-12.Search in Google Scholar

Sakama, C. (2011). Dishonest reasoning by abduction, 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1063-1064.Search in Google Scholar

Sierra, C. and Debenham, J.K. (2007). The logic negotiation model, 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), Honolulu, HI, USA, p. 243.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D. (2010). A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining, Artificial Intelligence 174(16-17): 1307-1322.10.1016/j.artint.2010.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Foo, N., Meyer, T. and Kwok, R. (2004). Negotiation as mutual belief revision, Proceedings of AAAI04, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 317-322. Search in Google Scholar