[BALDOCK, J.A. ‒ NELSON, P.N. 1999. Soil Organic matter. In SUMMER, M.E. (Ed) Handbook of Soil Science. Boca Raton : CRC Press. pp. B25‒B84. ISBN 0-8493-3136-6]Search in Google Scholar
[BARANČÍKOVÁ, G. ‒ BEZÁK, P. ‒ DODOK, R. ‒ CHLPÍK, J. ‒ KOBZA, J. ‒ MAKOVNÍKOVÁ, J. ‒ PÍŠ, V. 2011. Methods of determining indicators of agrochemical soil properties. In HRIVŇÁKOVÁ, K. ‒ MAKOVNÍKOVÁ, J. (Eds) Integrated procedures of soil analyse. Bratislava : VUPOP. pp. 52‒115. ISBN 978-80-89128-89-1]Search in Google Scholar
[BARANČÍKOVÁ, G. 2014. Monitoring of quantitative and qualitative composition of soil organic mater. In KOBZA, J. (Ed) Soil monitoring of the Slovak republic. Actual state and development og monitoring soil properties as the basis for their protection and land use (the period 2007-2012). Bratislava : NPPC-VUPOP. pp. 53‒89. ISBN 978-80-8163-004-0]Search in Google Scholar
[BARANČÍKOVÁ, G. ‒ MAKOVNÍKOVÁ, J. 2015. Comparison of two methods of soil organic carbon determination. In Polish Journal of Soil Science, vol. XLVIII/I, pp. 47‒56. DOI: 10.1795/pjss/2015.48.1.47]Search in Google Scholar
[BIELEK, P. 2014. Compendium of practically oriented soil science. Nitra : Slovenská Poľnohospodárska univerzita. pp. 135‒143. ISBN-978-80-552-1155-8]Search in Google Scholar
[DASON, J.J.C. ‒ SMITH, P. 2007. Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land-use management. In Review Science of the Total Environment, vol. 382, pp. 165‒190. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.02310.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.023]Search in Google Scholar
[DOANE, T.A. ‒ DEVEVRE, O.C. ‒ HORWATH, W.R. 2003. Short-term soil carbon dynamics of humic fractions in low-input and organic cropping systems. In Geoderma, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 319‒331. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00047-8]Search in Google Scholar
[ENEV, V. ‒ POSPÍŠILOVÁ, Ľ. ‒ KLUČÁKOVÁ, M. ‒ LIPTAJ, T. ‒ DOSKOČIL, L. 2014. Spectral characterization of selected humic substances. In Soil and Water Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9‒17.]Search in Google Scholar
[FIALA, K. 1999. Partial monitoring system – soil: obligatory methods. Bratislava : VUPOP. pp. 54‒57. ISBN 80-85361-55-8]Search in Google Scholar
[GELAW, M.A. ‒ SINGH, B.R. ‒ LAL, R. 2014. Soil organic matter and total nitrogen stocks under different land uses in semi-arid watershed in Tigray. Northern Ethiopia. In Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 118, pp. 256‒263. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agle.2014.02.035]Search in Google Scholar
[GERZEBEK, M.H. ‒ ANTIL, R.S. ‒ KOGEL-KNABNER, I. ‒ KNICKER, H. ‒ KIRSCHMANN, H. ‒ HABERHAUER, G. 2006. How are soil use and management reflected by soil organic matter characteristics: a spectroscopic approach. In European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 485‒494. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.0079.x]Search in Google Scholar
[GONZALES-PEREZ, M. ‒ MILORI, D.M.B.P. ‒ COLNAGO, L.A. ‒ MARTIN-NETO, L. ‒ MELO, W.J. 2007. A laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopic study of organic matter in a Brazilian Oxisols under different tillage systems. In Geoderma, vol. 138, no. 1‒2, pp. 20‒24. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.01010.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.010]Search in Google Scholar
[GUO, L.B. ‒ GIFFORD, R.M. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. In Global Change Biology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 345‒360. DOI:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x]Search in Google Scholar
[HATCHER, P.G. ‒ SCHNITZER, M. ‒ DENNIS, L.M. ‒ MACIEL. G.E. 1981. Aromaticity of humic substances in soils. In Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1089‒1094. DOI:10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060016x10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060016x]Search in Google Scholar
[JANZEN, H.H. 2006. The soil carbon dilemma: shall we hoard it or use it. In Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 419‒424. DOI:10.1016/j.soil-bio.2005.10.008]Search in Google Scholar
[MANU, V. ‒ WHITBREAD, A. ‒ BLAIR, N. ‒ BLAIR, G. 2014. Carbon status and structural stability of soils from different land use systems in the Kingdom of Tonga. In Soil Use and Management, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 517‒523. DOI:10.1111/sum.1213510.1111/sum.12135]Search in Google Scholar
[MICHELI, E. ‒ OWENS, P.R. ‒ LANG, V. ‒ FUCHSHEMPEL, J. 2014. Organic carbon as a major differentiation criterion in soil classification systems. In HARTEMINK, A. ‒ MCSWEENEY, K. (Eds) Soil Carbon. Heildelberg : Springer Cham. pp. 37‒43. ISBN 978-3-319-04083-710.1007/978-3-319-04084-4_4]Search in Google Scholar
[MINASNY, B. ‒ MCBRANDAN, A.B. ‒ MALONE, B.P. ‒ LACOSTE, M. ‒ WALTER, C. 2014. Quantitatively predicting soil carbon across landscapes. In HARTEMINK, A. ‒ MCSWEENEY, K. (Eds) Soil Carbon. Heildelberg : Springer Cham. pp. 45‒57. ISBN 978-3-319-04083-710.1007/978-3-319-04084-4_5]Search in Google Scholar
[NOVÁK, F. ‒ HRABAL, R. 2011. Quantitative 13C NMR spectroscopy of humic acids. In Chemické listy, vol. 105, pp.752‒760.]Search in Google Scholar
[ONO, K. ‒ HIRAI, K. ‒ MORITA, S. ‒ OHSE, K. ‒ HIRADATE, S. 2009. Organic carbon accumulation processes on a forest floor during an early humification stage in a temperate deciduous forest in Japan: Evaluation of chemical composition changes by 13C NMR and their decomposition rates from litterbag experiment. In Geoderma, vol. 151, no. 3‒4, pp. 351‒356. DOI:10.1016j.geoderma.2009.05.00110.1016/j.geoderma.2009.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[PEREZ, G.M. ‒ MARTIN-NETO, L. ‒ SAAB, S.C. ‒ NOVOTNY, E.H. ‒ MILORI, D.M.B.P. ‒ BAGNATO, V.S. ‒ COLNAGO, L.A. ‒ MELO, W.J. ‒ KNICKER, H. 2004. Characterization-of humic acids from a Brazilian Oxisol under different tillage systems by EPR. 13C NMR. FTIR and fluorescence spectroscopy. In Geoderma, vol. 118, no. 3‒4, pp. 181‒190. DOI:10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00192-710.1016/S0016-7061(03)00192-7]Search in Google Scholar
[SANFRORD, G.R. 2014. Perennial grasslands are essential for long term SOC storage in the Mollisols of the North Central USA. In HARTEMINK, A. ‒ MCSWEENEY, K. (Eds) Soil Carbon. Heildelberg : Springer Cham. pp. 281‒288. ISBN 978-3-319-04083-710.1007/978-3-319-04084-4_29]Search in Google Scholar
[SMITH, P. 2014. Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon? In Global Change Biology. vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2708‒2011. DOI:10.1111/gcb.1256110.1111/gcb.1256124604749]Search in Google Scholar
[SOCIETAS PEDOLOGICA SLOVACA. 2014. Morphogenetic Soil Classification System of Slovakia. Bratislava : NPPC-VUPOP, 96 p. ISBN 978-80-8163-005-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistical Yearbook of the Slovak Republic (1994). Veda. Bratislava. 734p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistical Yearbook of the Slovak Republic (2014). Veda. Bratislava, 669p.]Search in Google Scholar
[STOLBOVOY, V. ‒ MONTANARELLA, L. 2008. Application of soil organic carbon status indicators for the policy-decision making in the EU. In TOTH, G. ‒ MONTANARELLA, L. ‒ RUSCO. J. (Eds) Threats to soil quality in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 87‒99. ISBN 978-92-79-09529-0. DOI:10.2788/8647]Search in Google Scholar
[THAN, H.K. 2003. Humic matter in soil and in the environment. New York : Marcel Dekker. pp. 127‒135. ISBN 0-8247-4272-9]Search in Google Scholar