1. bookVolume 28 (2020): Issue 3 (July 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2284-5623
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Total Errors of TSH results by fluorescent immunoassay technique from dried blood spots in a newborn screening program for congenital hypothyroidism - variations in time

Published Online: 27 Jul 2020
Page range: 325 - 330
Received: 11 Jan 2020
Accepted: 09 Apr 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2284-5623
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Objective:the aim of this study was to evaluate the imprecision of the method used to determine TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) levels from dried blood spots in a newborn screening program and how the value of the coefficient of variation influences the total error of the method.

Methods:A short-term evaluation of imprecision was compared with the imprecision of the method assessed over five years. The coefficient of variation from the best quality control period and the worst quality control period were used. For Bias assessment mean results from the external quality program were used. Total Error was calculated with Bias and Coefficient of Variation values. A freely available software was used for standard deviation and coefficient of variation profiling.

Results:The values of the coefficient of variation for the short-term were lower than values obtained in worst quality control period but higher than in the best quality control period. Total error was higher than the accepted value for low-level control in the worst quality control period. Images obtained with the software showed that for high-level control coefficient of variation is concentration-dependent but this finding is not similar for low-level control.

Conclusions:Total Error of the Method may be subject to change in time. Initial evaluation of imprecision must be performed on a short term analysis but a continuous evaluation should be performed as the performance of a method may change in time. The evaluation should be performed on clinically significant levels for each parameter.

Keywords

1. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Selecting the right SQC procedurein Westgard JO, Basic QC Practices 4th ed. Westgard QC Inc. Madison,WI, 135-152.Search in Google Scholar

2. User verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline - Third Edition. CLSI document EP 15-A3. Wayne,PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Instutitute; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sadler WA. Imprecision Profiling. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29:33-36.Search in Google Scholar

4. Westgard JO. Quality Design and Control applications in Westgard JO. Six Sigma Design and Control 2nd ed. Westgard QC Inc. Madison,WI, 157-197.Search in Google Scholar

5. VFP Variance Function Program, http://www.aacb.asn.au/resources/useful-tools/variance-function-program-v14.Search in Google Scholar

6. Karmisholt J, Andersen S LP. Analytical goals for thyroid function tests when monitoring patients with untreated subclinical hypothyroidism. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010;70(4):264-8. DOI: 10.3109/0036551100378277810.3109/0036551100378277820429701Search in Google Scholar

7. Rawlins ML, Roberts WL. Performance Characteristics of Six Third-Generation Assays for Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone. Clin Chem. 2004;50:2338-44. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.03915610.1373/clinchem.2004.03915615472032Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhang S, Wang W, Zhao H, He F, Zhong K, Yuan S, et al. Status of internal quality control for thyroid hormones immunoassays from 2011 to2016 in China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32;e22154. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2215410.1002/jcla.22154681707728205257Search in Google Scholar

9. Adiga US. Sigma metrics of thyroid hormones. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;2:40-2.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo