<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The Consulting Readiness Index (CRI) is an attempt to assess the stage of development of a country’s management consulting sector by the analysis of indicators shown to vary in proportion to national management consulting markets. This paper outlines the logic applied and includes the key data leading to creation of the CRI.
</abstract>

Towards the Consulting Readiness Index

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This research note introduces newly published research which sets out a basic framework for exploring and explaining national variations in the use of external management consulting. It is based on an extensive search of secondary sources on consulting and on differences in the use of management practices more generally. It concludes by setting up a research agenda and dialogue with practitioners to examine the use and non-use of external consulting empirically in different countries.
</abstract>

National Drivers of Management Consulting Use – A Note on New Research

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Gone are the days when management consultancy projects were arranged due to friendship and networks, based on relationships between a board member and a consultant. Management Consultancy firms have themselves diluted high-personalisation by adopting a policy of commoditisation and workforce leverage in their quest for optimising profitability. Clients have diluted the one-to-one nature of buying by professionalising purchasing practices. Consulting firms nonetheless invest in relationship managers in the belief they rely on these strong relationships for their future business. Using semi-structured interviews to collect data on buyers’ triggers, validation, decision-making and selection processes, the research presented in this paper explores the changes in purchasing practices and examines what they mean with regard to what clients see as successful relationships between consultants and their clients.
</abstract>

Professional Purchasing Provides Professional Projects and Removes Personal Bias. Doesn’t It?

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

We review the concept of organisational resilience from the perspective of a consultant-client relationship. Specifically, we argue that the issue of a client’s resilience in the face of performance-diminishing disruptions needs to be a central theme of any consultant-client relationship. Management consultants have a responsibility to clients to support their resilience capabilities regardless of whether a given assignment explicitly uses the language of resilience. However, our literature review suggests this is a formidable challenge, particularly with larger and more complex client organisations. Understanding the client’s resilience landscape involves learning about the effectiveness of prior responses to disruptions at individual, organizational, and network levels. Advising the client on how to improve their resilience capabilities requires the consultant to think very carefully about the overall type of resilience needed, the reasons behind this stance, the level of implementation and the scope of implementation.
</abstract>

Building Resilience in Client Organisations: The Consultant’s Challenge

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This paper looks into the implications for management consultancies who aren’t implementing effective digital marketing strategies as part of their own advertising campaign.
</abstract>

The Dangerous Discord Between Sentiment and Reality: How Management Consultancies Should be Using Digital Marketing

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 7 (2024): Issue 1 (February 2024)

Volume 6 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 6 (2023): Issue 1 (February 2023)

Volume 5 (2022): Issue 2 (May 2022)

Volume 5 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 4 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 4 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 3 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)

Volume 2 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)

Volume 2 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)

Volume 1 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)

Volume 1 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

Management Consulting Journal

 The Management Consulting Journal (MCJ) focuses on the practice of management consulting and the management consulting sector. It publishes two volumes a year. It welcomes submissions from academics and practitioners. In addition to carrying full academic papers, it also includes ‘consulting shorts’, which are briefer reports and thought leadership pieces on contemporary consulting issues. It is an international journal drawing on research and insight from around the world, and is linked with the International Council of Management Consulting Institutes’ values and aims around standards and professionalism in the sector.   The aims of the journal are to:      Highlight and debate issues pertinent to the management consulting sector and management consulting practice.   Focus mainly on issues which have practical value, rather than discussing conceptual principles and theory.   Promote understanding of the management consulting sector and the practice of management consulting.      Archiving   Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.   Plagiarism Policy   The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 