[
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Candea, M. (2007). Arbitrary locations: In defence of the bounded field–site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 167–184.10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doyle, P. (2013). History of parks in Cheetham, Broughton and Salford. Understanding everyday participation. University of Manchester.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagles, S. (2009). Thomas Coglan Horsfall, and Manchester art museum and university settlement. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/settlements/manchester_art_museum_and_university_settlement.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, G. (2012). Practising participant observation: An anthropologist’s account. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1(1), 96–106.10.1108/20466741211220697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living knowledge (pp. 1–182). Retrieved from https://connected-communities.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Creating-Living-Knowledge.Final.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilmore A. (2017). The park and the commons: Vernacular spaces for everyday participation and cultural value, Cultural Trends, 26(1), 34–46. https://doi-org.manchester.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1274358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilmore, A., & Doyle, P. (2019). Histories of public parks in Manchester and Salford and their role in cultural policies for everyday participation. In E. Belfiore & L. Gibson (Eds.), Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance. Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/978-1-137-55027-9_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gidwani, V., & Baviskar, A. (2011). Urban Commons. Review of urban affairs: Economic & Political Weekly, 46(50).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graham, H. (2017).The art of taking part: Participation at the museum. ARKEN Bulletin, 7, 150–167. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/arken_museum/docs/bulletin_2017_fe4c9dee90af81
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graham, H. (2019). How the exhibition became co-produced: Attunement and participatory ontologies for museums. In P. Bjerregaard (Ed.), Exhibitions as research: Experimental methods in museums (pp. 181–194). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016). State of the UK public parks research report. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heumann Gurian, E. (2005). Threshold fear. In S. Macleod(Ed.), Reshaping Museum Space. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hine, D. (2015). Friendship and the Commons, in The European Cultural Foundation and Krytyka Politycz (Eds) Build the city: Perspectives on commons and culture, August 2015, Amsterdam: European Cultural Foundation, 32-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Historic England. (2017). Cheetham Park Shelter. Retrieved from https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1446330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(5), 500–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.70940310.1080/13604813.2012.709403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyde, L. (2012). Common as Air: Revolution, Art and Ownership London: Union Books
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jordan, H. (1994). Public Parks, 1885-1914. Garden History, 22, 85–113.10.2307/1587004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khonsari, T. (2015). ‘About’ Cheetham (Elizabeth Street) Park Project, https://cheethampark.wordpress.com/about/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lang, L. (2018). Making and enabling the commons: Shared urban spaces and civic engagement in North Manchester. In C.10.7228/manchester/9781526100733.003.0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis & J. Symons (Eds.), Realising the city: Urban ethnography in Manchester (pp. 107–128). Manchester University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linebaugh, P. (2009). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. California: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop Thief! The commons, enclosures and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manchester City Council. (2018, May 24) Update on Manchester parks strategy: 2017–2026: Report to Communities and Equalities Scrutiny Committee. Manchester: Manchester City Council.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGuirk, J. (2015, June 15). Urban commons have radical potential – it’s not just about community gardens. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/15/urban-common-radical-community-gardens
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nesta. (2016). Learning to rethink parks. London: Nesta.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Reilly, C. (2019). The greening of the city: Urban parks and public leisure, 1840-1939. CRC Press.10.4324/9781315866840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savage, M. (2013). The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A critical introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 3–21.10.1177/0263276413486160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. London: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Standing, G. (2019). Plunder of the commons: A manifesto for sharing public wealth. Penguin Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Star, S. & Griesemer, J. (1989). “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39”. Social Studies of Science. 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.10.1177/030631289019003001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Parks Agency. (2017, December 25). In austerity Britain people need parks, open letter. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2017/dec/25/in-austerity-britain-people-need-parks
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wacquant, L. (1989). For a socio-analysis of intellectuals: On homo academicus. An interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yardley, A. (2008). Piecing together – A methodological bricolage. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 31. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/416/903.
]Search in Google Scholar
