1. bookVolumen 7 (2013): Heft 4 (August 2013)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1875-855X
Erstveröffentlichung
01 Jun 2007
Erscheinungsweise
6 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Brief communication (Original). Multimodal imaging fiducial markers for kinematic measurement of joint models

Online veröffentlicht: 04 Feb 2017
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 7 (2013) - Heft 4 (August 2013)
Seitenbereich: 509 - 516
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1875-855X
Erstveröffentlichung
01 Jun 2007
Erscheinungsweise
6 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

1. Ammirati M, Gross JD, Ammirati G, Dugan S. Compariosn of registration accuracy of skin- and bone-implanted fiducials for frameless stereotaxis of the brain: a prospective study. Skul Base. 2002; 12: 125-30.10.1055/s-2002-33458-1165693817167664Search in Google Scholar

2. Armsby HP. The principles of animal nutrition. J. Wiley and Sons, New York; 1908.Search in Google Scholar

3. Barnden L, Kwiatek R, Lau Y, Hutton B, Thurfjell L, Pile K, et al. Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000; 27: 147-54.10.1007/s00259005002010755719DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

4. Choi Y, Ahn SH, Lee HS, Hur WJ, Yoon JH, Kim TH, et al. Clinical usefulness of implanted fiducial markers for hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2011; 29:91-8.10.3857/jkstro.2011.29.2.91DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

5. Cloutier G, Soulez G, Quanadli SD, Allard L, Qin Z, Cloutier F, et al. A multimodality vascular imaging phatom with fiducial markers visible in DSA, CTA, MRI, and ultrasound. Med Phys. 2004; 31:1424-33.10.1118/1.173930015259645DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

6. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, and Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:114-30.10.1097/01.blo.0000062385.79828.7212771822Search in Google Scholar

7. Gendrin C, Markelj P, Pawiro SA, Spoerk J, Bloch C, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: The comparison of intensity- and gradient-based merit functions using a new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38:1491-502.10.1118/1.3553403308976721520861DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

8. Grayeli AB, Esquia-Medina G, Nguyen Y, Mazalaigue S, Vellin J-F, Lombard B, et al. Use of anatomical or invasive markers in association with skin surface registration in image-guided surgery of the temporal bone. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2009; 129:405-10.10.1080/0001648080257902519153848Search in Google Scholar

9. Hendee WR, and Morgan CJ. Magnetic resonance imaging. Part I-physical principles. West J Med. 1984; 141:491-500.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ho JU, Chen MF, Chen WC. The feasibility study of customized fiducial markers in image fusion and position markers for radiation therapy. Proceedings of Korean Radio Therapiest Association Conference. 2008; 43:99-100.Search in Google Scholar

11. King DM, Fagan AJ, Moran CM, Browne JE. Comparative imaging study in ultrasound, MRI, CT, and DSA using a multimodality renal artery phantom. Med Phys. 2011; 38:565-73.10.1118/1.353367421452693DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

12. Kolind SH, Mackay AL, Munk PL, Xiang QS. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20:487-95.10.1002/jmri.2014415332257DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

13. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 410:69-81.10.1097/01.blo.0000062384.79828.3b12771818Search in Google Scholar

14. Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng Online. 2008; 7:6.10.1186/1475-925X-7-6DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

15. Li G, Defrate LE, Rubash HE, Gill TJ. In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weight-bearing knee flexion. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23:340-4.10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.006DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

16. Li G, Wuerz TH, Defrate LE. Feasibility of using orthogonal fluoroscopic images to measure in vivo joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126:314-8.10.1115/1.1691448DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

17. Parker CC, Damyanovich A, Haycocks T, Haider M, Bayley A, Catton CN. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tommography co-registration. Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66:217-24.10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00407-3DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

18. Pawiro SA, Markelj P, Pernus F, Gendrin C, Figl M, Weber C, et al. Validation for 2D/3D registration I: A new gold standard data set. Med Phys. 2011; 38: 1481-90.10.1118/1.3553402309101721520860DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

19. Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17:69-76.10.3109/10929088.2012.65482322348659DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

20. Vikhoff-Baaz B, Bergh AC, Starck G, Ekholm S, Wikkelso C. A new set of fiducial markers for MRI, CT and SPET alignment. Nucl Med Commun. 1997; 18:1148-54.10.1097/00006231-199712000-000069481761DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

21. West JJ, Patel AR, Kramer CM, Helms AS, Olson ES, Rangavajhala V, et al. Dynamic registration of preablation imaging with a catheter geometry to guide ablation in a Swine model: validation of image integration and assessment of catheter navigation accuracy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:81-7.10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01572.x19682169Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo