[1. Dallon JC, Ehrlich HP. A review of fibroblast collagen lattices. Wound Repair Regen. 2008; 16:472-9.10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00392.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Friess W. Collagen-biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998; 45:113-36.10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00017-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Lynn IVY, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2004; 71B: 343-54.10.1002/jbm.b.30096]Search in Google Scholar
[4. O’Leary R, Wood E. A novel in vitro dermal woundhealing model incorporating a response to mechanical wounding and repopulation of a fibrin provisional matrix. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology- Animal. 2003; 39:204-7.10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0204:ANIVDW>2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Hsu FY, Chueh SC, Wang YJ. Microspheres of hydroxyapatite/reconstituted collagen as supports for osteoblast cell growth. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:1931-6.10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00095-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Huang Y-C, Wang T-W, Sun J-S, Lin F-H. Epidermal morphogenesis in an in-vitro model using a fibroblastsembedded collagen scaffold. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2005; 12:855-67.10.1007/s11373-005-9018-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Angele P, Abke J, Kujat R, Faltermeier H, Schumann D, Nerlich M, et al. Influence of different collagen species on physico-chemical properties of crosslinked collagen matrices. Biomaterials. 2004; 25:2831-41.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.066]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Shanmugasundaram N, Ravikumar T, Babu M. Comparative physico-chemical and in vitro properties of fibrillated collagen scaffolds from different sources. J Biomater Appl. 2004; 18:247-6410.1177/0885328204040945]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[9. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979; 76:1274-8.10.1073/pnas.76.3.1274]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Zeugolis DI, Paul RG, Attenburrow G. Factors influencing the properties of reconstituted collagen fibers prior to self-assembly: animal species and collagen extraction method. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 86:892-904.10.1002/jbm.a.31694]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[11. Pieper JS, Oosterhof A, Dijkstra PJ, Veerkamp JH, van Kuppevelt TH. Preparation and characterization of porous crosslinked collagenous matrices containing bioavailable chondroitin sulphate. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:847-58.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00240-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Rajan N, Habermehl J, Cote M-F, Doillon CJ, Mantovani D. Prep aration o f read y-to -use, storab le and reconstituted type I collagen from rat-tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nat Protocols. 2007; 1:2753-58.10.1038/nprot.2006.430]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227:680-5.10.1038/227680a0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Piboonniyom SO, Timmermann S, Hinds P, Munger K. Aberrations in the MTS1 tumor suppressor locus in oral squamous cell carcinoma lines preferentially affect the INK4A gene and result in increased cdk6 activity. Oral Oncol. 2002; 38:179-86.10.1016/S1368-8375(01)00042-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983; 65: 55-63.10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Lin YK, Liu DC. Comparison of physical-chemical properties of type I collagen from different species. Food Chemistry. 2006; 99:244-51.10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.053]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 1077-86.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Berthod F, Saintigny G, Chretien F, Hayek D, Collombel C, Damour O. Optimization of thickness, pore size and mechanical properties of a biomaterial designed for deep burn coverage. Clin Mater. 1994; 15:259-65.10.1016/0267-6605(94)90055-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Lee JE, Park JC, Hwang YS, Kim JK, Kim JG, Sub H. Characterization of UV-irradiated dense/porous co llag en me mb ran es: mo rpho log y, enzy mat ic degradation, and mechanical properties. Yonsei Med J. 2001; 42:172-9.10.3349/ymj.2001.42.2.172]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Faraj KA, van Kuppevelt TH, Daamen WF. Construction of collagen scaffolds that mimic the three-dimensional architecture of specific tissues. Tissue Eng. 2007; 13:2387-9410.1089/ten.2006.0320]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005; 26:433-41.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Rhee S, Grinnell F. Fibroblast mechanics in 3D collagen matrices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007; 59:1299-305.10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Eckes B, Zigrino P, Kessler D, Holtkotter O, Shephard P, Mauch C, et al. Fibroblast-matrix interactions in wound healing and fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2000; 19: 325-32. 10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00077-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar