Cardiac stress-perfusion MRI: ready for primetime?

1 Kilner P. Personal communication to the author, 22 Oct 2012. KilnerP Personal communication to the author 22 Oct 2012 Search in Google Scholar

2 Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JCC, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 29–34. GrothuesF SmithGC MoonJCC CollinsP KleinHU PennellDJ Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy Am J Cardiol 2002 90 29 34 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02381-0 Search in Google Scholar

3 Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: twenty-first century solutions in cardiology. Clinical Medicine 2003; 3: 273–8. PennellDJ Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: twenty-first century solutions in cardiology Clinical Medicine 2003 3 273 8 10.7861/clinmedicine.3-3-273495245612848266 Search in Google Scholar

4 Geva T. MRI Is the Preferred Method for Evaluating Right Ventricular Size and Function in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 7: 190–197. GevaT MRI Is the Preferred Method for Evaluating Right Ventricular Size and Function in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014 7 190 197 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000553400637424449548 Search in Google Scholar

5 Te Riele ASJM, Tandri H, Sanborn DM, Bluemke DA. Noninvasive Multimodality Imaging in ARVD/C. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 597–611. Te RieleASJM TandriH SanbornDM BluemkeDA Noninvasive Multimodality Imaging in ARVD/C JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015 8 597 611 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.007475558525937197 Search in Google Scholar

6 Karamitsos TD, Arvanitaki A, Karvounis H, Neubauer S, Ferreira VM. State-of-the-Art Review: Myocardial Tissue Characterization and Fibrosis by Imaging. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020. 13: 1221–1234. KaramitsosTD ArvanitakiA KarvounisH NeubauerS FerreiraVM State-of-the-Art Review: Myocardial Tissue Characterization and Fibrosis by Imaging JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2020 13 1221 1234 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.03031542534 Search in Google Scholar

7 Gulsin GS, A. Singh A, McCann GP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of heart valve disease BMC Med Imaging. 2017; 17: 67. GulsinGS A. SinghA McCannGP Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of heart valve disease BMC Med Imaging 2017 17 67 10.1186/s12880-017-0238-0574709729284450 Search in Google Scholar

8 Taylor AJ, Salerno M, Dharmakumar R, Jerosch-Herold M. State-of-the-Art Paper. T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications. JACC: Cardiovasc Imag 2016; 9: 67–81. TaylorAJ SalernoM DharmakumarR Jerosch-HeroldM State-of-the-Art Paper. T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications JACC: Cardiovasc Imag 2016 9 67 81 Search in Google Scholar

9 Khalique Z, Ferreira PF, Scott AD, Nielles-Vallespin S, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. State-of-the-Art Review: Diffusion Tensor Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Perspective JACC: Cardiovasc Imag 2020; 13: 1235–55. KhaliqueZ FerreiraPF ScottAD Nielles-VallespinS FirminDN PennellDJ State-of-the-Art Review: Diffusion Tensor Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Perspective JACC: Cardiovasc Imag 2020 13 1235 55 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.01631607663 Search in Google Scholar

10 Hamon M, Fau G, Née G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:29–38. HamonM FauG NéeG EhtishamJ MorelloR HamonM Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010 12 29 38 10.1186/1532-429X-12-29289068220482819 Search in Google Scholar

11 Charoenpanichkit, C., Hundley, W.G. The 20 year evolution of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010. 12, 59. CharoenpanichkitC. HundleyW.G. The 20 year evolution of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010 12 59 10.1186/1532-429X-12-59298457520977757 Search in Google Scholar

12 Abbott BG, Case JA, Dorbala S et al. Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging—Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Circulation: Cardiovasc. Imag. 2018; 11: e000020. AbbottBG CaseJA DorbalaS Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging—Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Circulation: Cardiovasc. Imag. 2018 11 e000020 10.1161/HCI.000000000000002030354679 Search in Google Scholar

13 Einstein A. Effects of Radiation Exposure From Cardiac Imaging: How Good Are the Data? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 553–565. EinsteinA Effects of Radiation Exposure From Cardiac Imaging: How Good Are the Data? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 59 553 565 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.079327262722300689 Search in Google Scholar

14 https://www.nice.org.uk/sharedlearning/ct-coronary-angiography https://www.nice.org.uk/sharedlearning/ct-coronary-angiography Search in Google Scholar

15 Danad I., Szymonifka J., Twisk J.W.R. et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2017; 38: 991–998. DanadI. SzymonifkaJ. TwiskJ.W.R. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis Eur. Heart J 2017 38 991 998 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw095538159427141095 Search in Google Scholar

16 Siontis GCM, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP et al. Outcomes of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2018;360:k452. SiontisGCM MavridisD GreenwoodJP Outcomes of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials BMJ 2018 360 k452 10.1136/bmj.k504582064529467161 Search in Google Scholar

17 Jivan A, Lee DC. Is stress perfusion CMR ready for prime time? https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2017/12/08/10/32/is-stress-cmr-ready-for-prime-time Accessed online 30/01/2021. JivanA LeeDC Is stress perfusion CMR ready for prime time? https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2017/12/08/10/32/is-stress-cmr-ready-for-prime-time Accessed online 30/01/2021. Search in Google Scholar

18 Asher A, Ghelani R, Thornton G et al. UK perspective on the changing landscape of non-invasive cardiac testing. Open Heart. 2019; 6: e001186 AsherA GhelaniR ThorntonG UK perspective on the changing landscape of non-invasive cardiac testing Open Heart 2019 6 e001186 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001186692751331908814 Search in Google Scholar

19 Francis, Sanjeev F, Cohen J, Olchanski N et al. Stress CMR myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) is cost-effective compared to nuclear SPECT: a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012, 14 (Suppl 1): 03. Francis, SanjeevF CohenJ OlchanskiN Stress CMR myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) is cost-effective compared to nuclear SPECT: a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 14 Suppl 1 03 10.1186/1532-429X-14-S1-O3 Search in Google Scholar

20 Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR et al. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1395–1407. MaronDJ HochmanJS ReynoldsHR Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease N Engl J Med 2020 382 1395 1407 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922726383332227755 Search in Google Scholar

21 Shaw L, Kwong R, Nagel E et al. Cardiac Imaging in the Post-ISCHEMIA Trial Era: A Multisociety Viewpoint. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:1815–1833. ShawL KwongR NagelE Cardiac Imaging in the Post-ISCHEMIA Trial Era: A Multisociety Viewpoint JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020 13 1815 1833 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.00132762886 Search in Google Scholar

22 Onciul S, Popa O, Nicolaesu R et al. Stress perfusion CMR – a report of an initial Romanian Experience. Romanian J Cardiol 2021, 31: 1–11. OnciulS PopaO NicolaesuR Stress perfusion CMR – a report of an initial Romanian Experience Romanian J Cardiol 2021 31 1 11 10.47803/rjc.2021.31.1.52 Search in Google Scholar

23 Google search performed on 30/01/2021, using the key words “rezonanţă magnetică nucleară” and “Bucureşti” (nuclear magnetic resonance and Bucharest). Google search performed on 30/01/2021, using the key words “rezonanţă magnetică nucleară” and “Bucureşti” (nuclear magnetic resonance and Bucharest) Search in Google Scholar

24 https://www.wales.nhs.uk/ourservices/directory/Hospitals accessed on 30/01/2021, for list of major hospitals. The figure of only 5 hospitals which offer CMR comes from the author’s knowledge of the service structure in Wales. https://www.wales.nhs.uk/ourservices/directory/Hospitals accessed on 30/01/2021, for list of major hospitals. The figure of only 5 hospitals which offer CMR comes from the author’s knowledge of the service structure in Wales Search in Google Scholar

25 https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ accessed online on 29/01/2021. https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ accessed online on 29/01/2021 Search in Google Scholar

26 Petersen, S.E., Matthews, P.M., Francis, J.M. et al. UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 18: 8. PetersenS.E. MatthewsP.M. FrancisJ.M. UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015 18 8 10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4473670326830817 Search in Google Scholar