Login
Registrieren
Passwort zurücksetzen
Veröffentlichen & Verteilen
Verlagslösungen
Vertriebslösungen
Themen
Allgemein
Altertumswissenschaften
Architektur und Design
Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Buchwissenschaft
Biologie
Chemie
Geowissenschaften
Geschichte
Industrielle Chemie
Informatik
Jüdische Studien
Kulturwissenschaften
Kunst
Linguistik und Semiotik
Literaturwissenschaft
Materialwissenschaft
Mathematik
Medizin
Musik
Pharmazie
Philosophie
Physik
Rechtswissenschaften
Sozialwissenschaften
Sport und Freizeit
Technik
Theologie und Religion
Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Veröffentlichungen
Zeitschriften
Bücher
Konferenzberichte
Verlage
Blog
Kontakt
Suche
EUR
USD
GBP
Deutsch
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Warenkorb
Home
Zeitschriften
Romanian Journal of Cardiology
Band 31 (2021): Heft 4 (December 2021)
Uneingeschränkter Zugang
The Current Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging According to European Society of Cardiology Guidelines and Statements
(Third part)
Ramona Bica
Ramona Bica
,
Virgil Ionescu
Virgil Ionescu
,
Jan Bogaert
Jan Bogaert
und
Anca Florian
Anca Florian
| 05. Mai 2022
Romanian Journal of Cardiology
Band 31 (2021): Heft 4 (December 2021)
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Artikel
Figuren und Tabellen
Referenzen
Autoren
Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Vorschau
PDF
Zitieren
Teilen
Article Category:
Review
Online veröffentlicht:
05. Mai 2022
Seitenbereich:
819 - 829
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47803/rjc.2020.31.4.819
© 2021 Ramona Bica et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Cine (A, C) and LGE (B, D) images in two device patients with subsequent first diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis based on the CMR findings. In the first case (A, B), with pace-maker implantation for third degree atrioventricular block (lead artifact in RA, RV), extensive subepicardial to transmural LGE can be depicted in the septum and lateral wall (red arrows) as well as in the RV apex (white arrow), raising the suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis. In the second case (C, D), with secondary prophylactic ICD (RV lead artifact) implantation after resuscitated cardiac arrest, subepicardial LGE in the hypertrophied basal anteroseptum can be seen (red arrows), also raising the suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis. Note the signal loss (*) and artifact in the (not assessable) basal anterior wall (arrow head) caused by the larger generator of the ICD, not present in the case of the pacemaker.
Figure 2
CMR images in a patient with bicuspid aortic valve (fusion of the right and left coronary cusps, B) and severe, eccentric, aortic valve regurgitation (red arrows, A), as shown in the cine images (A, B). The analysis of the flow CMR measurement in the proximal ascending aorta provided a regurgitation fraction of 52%, as calculated by the ratio between regurgitant and systolic (forward) volumes (C). CMR contrast angiography, here as 3D-volume rendering (D), revealed an associated aneurysm of the ascending aorta.
Figure 3
CMR images in a patient with atrial septal defect, superior sinus venosus type. In the cine images (A, B, C), a communication in the upper part of the atrial septum can be seen between the confluence of superior vena cava (VCS) to right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA). In addition, partial anomalous venous return of the superior right pulmonary vein to VCS (C) and middle right pulmonary vein to the confluence of superior vena cava (VCS) to right atrium (RA) (B) is associated. Flow quantification in the proximal pulmonary artery and ascending aorta revealed a relevant left to right shunt, with a Qp/Qs of 2.3 (D).
Figure 4
CMR images in a patient with severe pulmonary valve regurgitation after Fallot tetralogy repair. In the cine images (A, B) a wide, almost free, regurgitant jet can be observed (white arrows). A “through plane” flow CMR measurement in the proximal pulmonary artery (C) was planned on the cine images (red lines, A, B) and its analysis revealed a regurgitation fraction of 56% as well as a positive end-diastolic flow suggestive of a “RV restrictive physiology”, i.e. increased RV end-diastolic pressure (D).
Figure 5
Edema sensitive T2-STIR (A, C) and LGE images (B, D) in a patient with acute pericarditis at baseline (A, B) and follow-up (FU; C, D), after a 3-month course of cortisone and colchicine. At baseline, marked, circular pericardial edema (T2-hyperintensity, A, white arrows) and LGE (B, red arrows) together with a small pericardial effusion (B, arrow heads) are depicted. At FU, an obvious regression of the above changes is noticed, with only minimal residual pericardial edema (C, white arrows) and LGE (D, red arrows) and no effusion.
Vorschau