Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Vegetation map of the nature reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna (Ukraine)

  
01. Sept. 2025

Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN

Figure 1:

Map of study area: A – position in Europe; B – schematic map of the nature reserve “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”: 1 – “old territory” of the reserve, 2 – “strictly protected steppe”, 3 – “new territory” of the reserve.Slika 1: Zemljevid raziskovanega območja: A – položaj v Evropi; B – shematski zemljevid naravnega rezervata “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”: 1 - “staro ozemlje” rezervata, 2 - “strogo zaščitena stepa”, 3 - “novo ozemlje” rezervata.
Map of study area: A – position in Europe; B – schematic map of the nature reserve “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”: 1 – “old territory” of the reserve, 2 – “strictly protected steppe”, 3 – “new territory” of the reserve.Slika 1: Zemljevid raziskovanega območja: A – položaj v Evropi; B – shematski zemljevid naravnega rezervata “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”: 1 - “staro ozemlje” rezervata, 2 - “strogo zaščitena stepa”, 3 - “novo ozemlje” rezervata.

Figure 2:

Vegetation map of the nature reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna based on the research data (2021–2023).Slika 2: Vegetacijska karta naravnega rezervata Mihailivska Tsilina narejena na podlagi raziskav v letih 2021–2023.
Vegetation map of the nature reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna based on the research data (2021–2023).Slika 2: Vegetacijska karta naravnega rezervata Mihailivska Tsilina narejena na podlagi raziskav v letih 2021–2023.

Figure 3:

Percentage ratio between the areas occupied by the main complexes of phytocenoses of the reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna.Remarks: A – old territory of the reserve (OT), B – new territory of the reserve (NT), the number(s) in brackets – the number(s) of the complex(es) in the map legend listed above.Slika 3: Razmerje v odsotkih med površinami, ki jih pokrivajo glavni kompleksi fitocenoz v rezervatu Mykhailivska Tsilyna.Opombe: A – staro ozemlje rezervata (OT), B – novo ozemlje rezervata (NT), številka(-e) v oklepaju – številka(-e) kompleksa( ov) v zgoraj navedeni legendi karte.
Percentage ratio between the areas occupied by the main complexes of phytocenoses of the reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna.Remarks: A – old territory of the reserve (OT), B – new territory of the reserve (NT), the number(s) in brackets – the number(s) of the complex(es) in the map legend listed above.Slika 3: Razmerje v odsotkih med površinami, ki jih pokrivajo glavni kompleksi fitocenoz v rezervatu Mykhailivska Tsilyna.Opombe: A – staro ozemlje rezervata (OT), B – novo ozemlje rezervata (NT), številka(-e) v oklepaju – številka(-e) kompleksa( ov) v zgoraj navedeni legendi karte.

Figure 4:

Generalized changes of the vegetation in the old territory of the nature reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna. Remarks: A – state of the vegetation in 2011 (Tkachenko & Fitsailo, 2016), B – state of the vegetation in 2022, 1 – meadow-steppe communities, 2 – shrub-steppe communities, 3 – meadow communities, 4 – tree and shrub communities, 5 – ruderal and forb communities.Slika 4: Splošne spremembe vegetacije na starem ozemlju naravnega rezervata “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”. Opombe: A – stanje vegetacije v letu 2011 (Tkachenko & Fitsailo, 2016), B – stanje vegetacije v letu 2022, 1 – travniško-stepske združbe, 2 – grmiščno-stepske združbe, 3 – travniške združbe, 4 – drevesne in grmiščne združbe, 5 – ruderalne združbe in združbe steblik.
Generalized changes of the vegetation in the old territory of the nature reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna. Remarks: A – state of the vegetation in 2011 (Tkachenko & Fitsailo, 2016), B – state of the vegetation in 2022, 1 – meadow-steppe communities, 2 – shrub-steppe communities, 3 – meadow communities, 4 – tree and shrub communities, 5 – ruderal and forb communities.Slika 4: Splošne spremembe vegetacije na starem ozemlju naravnega rezervata “Mykhailivska Tsilyna”. Opombe: A – stanje vegetacije v letu 2011 (Tkachenko & Fitsailo, 2016), B – stanje vegetacije v letu 2022, 1 – travniško-stepske združbe, 2 – grmiščno-stepske združbe, 3 – travniške združbe, 4 – drevesne in grmiščne združbe, 5 – ruderalne združbe in združbe steblik.

Figure 5.

Influence of cessation of mowing on the steppe vegetation of the reserve. Remarks: A – vegetation of AFLs (every year mown area), B – vegetation of EMS (area that was not mown during 11 years), C – vegetation of SPS (area that was not mown during 75 years).Slika 5: Vpliv opustitve košnje na stepsko vegetacijo rezervata. Opombe: A – vegetacija AFL (površina pokošena vsako leto), B – vegetacija EMS (površina, ki ni bila pokošena 11 let), C – vegetacija SPS (površina, ki ni bila pokošena 75 let).
Influence of cessation of mowing on the steppe vegetation of the reserve. Remarks: A – vegetation of AFLs (every year mown area), B – vegetation of EMS (area that was not mown during 11 years), C – vegetation of SPS (area that was not mown during 75 years).Slika 5: Vpliv opustitve košnje na stepsko vegetacijo rezervata. Opombe: A – vegetacija AFL (površina pokošena vsako leto), B – vegetacija EMS (površina, ki ni bila pokošena 11 let), C – vegetacija SPS (površina, ki ni bila pokošena 75 let).

Changes in abundance of dominant species in the reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna during the period 1927 – 2011 under different regimes of preservation_Tabela 2: Spremembe abundance dominantnih vrst v rezervatu Mykhailivska Tsilyna v obdobju 1927–2011 v različnih režimih ohranjanja_

Not reserved Periodically mown steppe
1927 1956 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
Festuca stricta subsp. sulcata (dom.), Agrostis vinealis, Carex humilis F. stricta subsp. sulcata (dom.), Stipa capillata (dom.), Bromopsis inermis (>), Calamagrostis epigejos (>) B. inermis (dom.), C. epigejos (>) tussock grasses (<) Poa angustifolia (<) Elytrigia repens (>), Cytisus ruthenicus (>) B. inermis (<) C. epigejos (<) tussock grasses (<) C. ruthenicus (dom.), E. repens (>) P. angustifolia (<) Arrhenatherum elatius (dom.), C. ruthenicus (<), E. repens (>) P. angustifolia (>) A. elatius (dom.), E. repens (<), tussock grasses (>)

non-controlled mow. & gra. mow. 1 time per 5 years mow. 1 time per 4 years mow. 1 time per 3 years mow. 1 time per 2 years mow. 4 times per 5 years

Strictly protected steppe
1956 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011

B. inermis (dom.), tussock grasses B. inermis (dom.), C. epigejos (>), P angustifolia (>), tussock grasses (<) B. inermis (dom.), E. repens (>), P. angustifolia (<), tussock grasses (<) E. repens (dom.), mesic forb species (>), B. inermis (<) Urtica dioica (dom.), E. repens (<), C. ruthenicus (>) U. dioica (<), E. repens (<), C. ruthenicus (<) C. epigejos (>), Prunus spinosa (>)

Changes of synphytoindication indexes (according to Ya_ P_ Didukh scale) of plant communities in the old territory of the reserve Mykhailivska Tsilyna during 95 years_Tabela 1: Spremembe sinfitoindikacijskih indeksov (po lestvici Ya_ P_ Didukha) rastlinskih združb na starem ozemlju rezervata Mykhailivska Tsilyna v 95 letih_

Author V. S. Tkachenko, H. M. Lysenko & A. P. Vakal H. M. Lysenko M. S. Larionov
Year 1927 1971 1991 2003 2022
Index Mean Mean PMS SPS Mean PMS SPS Mean Min Max AFLs EMS
Hd 8.90 ± 0.14 9.60 ± 0.60 9.60 ± 0.21 9.70 ± 0.24 10.11 ± 0.65 9.92 ± 0.15 10.23 ± 0.29 10.18 9.02 12.6 9.85 ± 0.04 10.04 ± 0.03
Rc 8.66 ± 0.21 8.27 ± 0.22 8.25 ± 0.09 8.23 ± 0.08 7.90 ± 0.24 7.99 ± 0.05 7.82 ± 0.11 8.23 7.26 8.65 8.47 ± 0.02 8.33 ± 0.02
Nt 4.36 ± 0.18 4.71 ± 0.40 4.72 ± 0.15 4.76 ± 0.13 5.04 ± 0.38 4.90 ± 0.09 5.12 ± 0.18 6.25 4.87 7.64 5.64 ± 0.03 5.88 ± 0.02
Sl 8.43 ± 0.24 8.25 ± 0.20 8.20 ± 0.06 8.36 ± 0.07 8.00 ± 0.22 7.99 ± 0.05 8.07 ± 0.06 - - - 8.18 ± 0.03 8.20 ± 0.03
Tm 8.82 ± 0.09 8.65 ± 0.20 8.64 ± 0.06 8.57 ± 0.07 8.40 ± 0.17 8.51 ± 0.06 8.44 ± 0.05 7.06 6.2 7.93 8.76 ± 0.02 8.70 ± 0.2

Regime NR, mow.+ gra. mow.+ strict mow. strict mow.+ strict mow. strict mow.+ strict - - mow. strict
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Botanik, Ökologie, Biologie, andere