[
Bajt, V., 2016. Who “Belongs”? Migration, Nationalism and National Identity in Slovenia. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies 76, 49–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balibar, É., 2002a. Politics and the Other Scene. Verso, London, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balibar, É., 2002b. The Nation Form: History and Ideology. In P. Essed & D. T. Goldberg (eds.) Race Critical Theories. Blackwell, Malden (MA), 220–230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balibar, É., 2004. We, the People of Europe?: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balibar, É. & Wallerstein, I., 1991. Race, Nation and Class: Ambiguous Identities. Verso, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berlant, L., 1997. The Queen of America Goes to Washington. Duke University Press, Durham, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P., 2014. On the State: Lectures at the College de France 1989–1992. Polity Press, Cambridge, Malden (MA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P., 2018. Classification Struggles: General Sociology, Volume 1. Lectures at the College de France 1981–82. Polity Press, Cambridge, Medford (MA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia 33 (1991).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eriksen, T. H., 1993. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives. Pluto Press, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farris, S., 2017. In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Duke University Press, Durham (NC).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 1978. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. Pantheon Books, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 1984. Nadzorovanje in kaznovanje. Delavska enotnost, Ljubljana.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 2000. The Risks of Security. In J. D. Faubion Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. 3. New Press, New York, 365–381.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M., 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. M. Senellart (ed.). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorjanc, V. & Fišer, D., 2018. Twitter in razmerja moči: diskurzivna analiza kampanj ob referendumu za izenačitev zakonskih zvez v Sloveniji. Slavistična revija 66 (4), 473–495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hrženjak, M., 2001. Legitimiziranje neenakosti: Interpretacija magnetograma 7. izredne seje Državnega zbora in 5. izredne seje Odbora za zdravstvo, delo, družino, socialno politiko in invalide o zdravljenju neplodnosti z biomedicinsko pomočjo in dostopa do postopkov umetne oploditve. Media Watch, http://mediawatch.mirovni-institut.si/bilten/seznam/11/referendum/#5. (accessed 5 February 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kania, U., 2020. Marriage for All (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of the Marriage Equality Debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies 17 (2), 138–155, DOI:10.1080/17405904.2019.1656656.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhar, R., 2010. Intimno državljanstvo. ŠKUC, Ljubljana.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhar, R., 2015. Konec je sveta, kakšrnega poznamo: populistične strategije nasprotnikov Družinskega zakonika. Časopis za kritiko znanosti 43 (260), 118–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhar, R. & Patternote, D. (eds.), 2017. Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. Rowman & Littlefield, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liebler, M. C., Schwartz, J. & Harper, T., 2009. Queer Tales of Morality: The Press, Same-Sex Marriage, and Hegemonic Framing. Journal of Communication 59 (4), 653–675, DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01451.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malačič, J., 1984. Demografske razmere v Sloveniji. Teorija in praksa 21 (7/8), 683–701.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maljevac, S. & Gobec, L., 2017. Neokonservativni populizem na pohodu: elitizem zakonske zveze. Časopis za kritiko znanosti 45 (267), 291–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mencin Čeplak, M., 2005a. Referendum proti načelu enakosti pred zakonom. In V. Leskošek (ed.) Mi in oni: nestrpnost na Slovenskem. Mirovni inštitut, Ljubljana, 111–129.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mencin Čeplak, M., 2005b. Začaran krog diskriminacije: od moralne diskreditacije homoseksualnosti do neenakosti gejev in lezbijk pred zakonom – in nazaj. Družboslovne razprave 49/50, 175–186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mencin Čeplak, M., 2016. Abortion, or an Everlasting Problem with/for Women. Teorija in praksa 53 (6), 1369–1385.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mencin Čeplak, M. & Kuhar, R., 2010. Boji za enakost: od diskriminacije homoseksualnosti do redefinicije družine. Socialno delo 49 (5/6), 283–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosse, G. L., 1985. Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe. Howard Fertig, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paterson, L. & Coffey-Glover, L., 2018. Discourses of Marriage in Same-Sex Marriage Debates in the UK Press 2011–2014. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7 (2), 175–204, DOI:10.1075/jls.17022.pat.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson, V. S., 1999. Sexing Political Identities/Nationalism as Heterosexism. International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1), 34–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollak, S. & Sobočan, A. M., 2017. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Family Legislation Changes in Slovene Media. In International Corpus Linguistic Conference. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 765–769, http://paulslals.org.uk/ccr/CL2017ExtendedAbstracts.pdf (accessed 2 November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puar, J., 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Duke University Press, Durham (NC).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajgelj, B., 2010. Razmerja v istospolnih družinah – kje smo in kam lahko gremo? Socialno delo 49 (5/6), 305–318.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rožman, S., 2009. Geneza pravice do umetne prekinitve nosečnosti v nekdanji Jugoslaviji. Ars et Humanitas 3 (1/2), 301–325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salecl, R., 2002. The Spoils of Freedom: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Ideology after the Fall of Socialism. Routledge, London, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobočan, A. M. & Pollak, S., 2016. Manifestacije moralne panike v medijskih podobah novele družinske zakonodaje. Časopis za kritiko znanosti 44 (266), 163–187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
State Election Commission, 2012. Zakonodajni referendum o družinskem zakoniku – 25. marec 2012, https://www.dvk-rs.si/index.php/si/arhiv-referendumi/zakonodajni-referendum-o-druzinskem-zakoniku (accessed 2 November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
State Election Commission, 2015. Referendum o Zakonu o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o zakonski zvezi in družinskih razmerjih, https://www.dvk-rs.si/arhivi/zzzdr2015 (accessed 2 November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, S. B., 2008. Citizenship, Reproduction and the State: International Marriage and Human Rights. Citizenship Studies 12 (1), 45–54, DOI:10.1080/13621020701794166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vezovnik, A., 2015. Slovenski predlog Družinskega zakonika in njegovi politični argumenti. Teorija in praksa 52 (6), 1191–1211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weissman, A. L., 2017. Repronormativity and the Reproduction of the Nation-State: The State and Sexuality Collide. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 13 (3), 277–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuval-Davis, N., 1996. Women and the Biological Reproduction of “the Nation”. Women’s Studies International Forum 19 (1/2), 17–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuval-Davis, N., 1997. Gender and Nation. University of East London, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
