Over the last decade, India has experienced rapid and unplanned urbanisation. Due to the migration of poor people from rural to urban areas to maintain a livelihood, most cities in India have seen a constant rise in slum populations [1,2]. Increasing population disproportional to the available resources, preexisting occupational and social vulnerability and poorly developed health infrastructure have led to poor health outcomes among slum populations in Nagpur, Maharashtra [3,4]. The majority of the health indicators, including childhood illnesses, malnutrition and infant and under-five mortality rate, are worse among the urban poor (i.e., mostly slum-dwellers) when compared to their non-slum-dwelling counterparts [5]. Despite better availability of health facilities in urban regions, inequity in distribution resulting in lack of health access for slum-dwellers leads to poor health status among them.
The Government of India launched National Urban Health Mission (NUHM) in 2013 to streamline health care delivery systems in urban areas, with an emphasis on slums [6].
Under NUHM, urban primary health centres (UPHCs) are the first point-of-contact fixed facilities to provide comprehensive health services on an outpatient basis. However, since it was felt that fixed facilities could not meet the health needs of all urban people, especially in densely populated slums, Urban Health and Nutrition Day (UHND) was introduced by NUHM as a routine outreach activity to provide a convergence platform where a package of preventive, promotive and basic curative services could be provided by community health workers (CHW) at the doorsteps of the urban poor. UHNDs also provide an opportunity to improve community empowerment and ownership through an Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) and Mahila Aarogya Samiti (MAS) members from the community [7,8]. Thus, the smooth functioning of UHND is of utmost importance to improving the overall health of the urban poor [9].
NUHM activities are being implemented in phases in various cities of India. In Nagpur, it is in a nascent stage, operationalised since 2016. Anecdotal evidence from monthly reports of auxiliary nurse midwives (ANM) reflects that implementation of UHNDs is not as per recommendations. To date, to the best of our knowledge, no implementation research or external monitoring has been conducted in the current setting to assess the actual performances of UHND. Further, the perspectives of CHWs regarding bottlenecks in implementing the UHND have not been explored. Any endeavour to streamline the conduct of UHND requires baseline information. With this background, this study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the current implementation status of UHND sessions in areas served by selected UPHCs in the Nagpur district of Maharashtra and to explore perceived bottlenecks and solutions from the CHWs’ point of view.
The study was conducted at Nandanvan UPHC, located in Nagpur, which caters to about 80,000 people, including 52,000 slum dwellers. The community-based outreach services of Nandanvan UPHC are provided through 28 UHNDs, which are held once a month on pre-specified dates. They are usually organised in Anganwadi centres (AWCs), primary schools or other suitable community spaces, where a package of services are provided by Anganwadi workers (AWW) and ANM, whereas community mobilisation is carried out by ASHA and MAS members. One nongovernmental organisation (NGO) also works in collaboration with health authorities to coordinate UHND activities. To get a broad insight into the study topic, professional diversity was considered in selecting the participants. ANMs, ASHAs, AWWs and an NGO representative involved in the UHND sessions were included as participants in the qualitative inquiry and are termed as CHWs.
This mixed-method study was conducted using a triangulation design, and data were collected between November 2019 and January 2020.
For the qualitative interviews, all ANMs, staff nurses involved in service delivery, were included, and ASHAs were approached based on their expressed willingness to participate in the study. An initial gap assessment was carried out quantitatively using an observation checklist as the first study tool to assess quality of care. The checklist was prepared according to the guidelines proposed by NUHM for conducting UHND [9]. Data were filled by trained epidemiologists for each observed session. Terms of references (TOR) included domains under the implementation of maternal and child health care; curative care for common conditions; screening and continuity of care for NCDs; raising awareness toward preventive and promotive health; provision of family planning services; and access to essential drugs and testing facility. To assess recent regularity and use of services, data on regularity of sessions, number of beneficiaries in each session, due list and follow-up details, availability of logistics and so on were obtained using a structured data extraction form from the last six months of reports prepared by ANMs.
After quantitative assessment, qualitative techniques were used to understand the bottlenecks and barriers in implementing the services. Researchers trained in qualitative methods collected the data. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were carried out among eight purposively selected ASHAs, eight AWWs, four ANMs and one NGO representative, all in the regional language, using a pre-tested, unstructured interview guide as second study tool. An IDI guide included questions related to all the terms of reference. Interviews were continued until data saturation. Field observations and IDIs were followed by focus group discussion (FGDs) among ASHAs. After the briefing on the objectives of the exercise, two free-listing exercises were conducted involving ASHAs on: (1) Activities carried out in their UHND session, and (2) activities expected to be carried out in UHND. After free listing, one FGD was carried out among 11 ASHAs present on that day with the help of a predesigned FGD guide (the third study tool). The domains unearthed in the IDIs were used in the FGD guide. Each TOR was discussed among the group, and for each domain, gaps were identified, possible reasons and ways to address such gaps as perceived by ASHAs were considered. Multiple probes were given in the vernacular language whenever clarification was needed. The entire FGD exercise lasted 90 minutes and was audio recorded; a transcript was prepared on the same day by the person who took notes in the FGD.
The flow of integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in data collection and analysis is depicted in Fig 1.
The proportion of UHND sessions providing each component of services was presented by number and percentage. The free listing exercise on expected and actual services delivered in UHND was analysed in Anthropac to get the salience score. Smith’s salience score is an index that indicates the importance and centrality of the specific item. A score close to 1 indicates high salience, and a score close to zero indicates less salience [10]. The audio-recorded clips were transcribed into English and read several times iteratively by two independent researchers. Identification of relevant codes and thematic analysis content was carried out manually to identify patterns of meaning across the transcripts.
Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before each interview. To ensure privacy, the confidentiality of the opinion and participants’ comfort, interviews were conducted at a place and time convenient to them, and no identifiers were included in the transcript. The transcripts and audio-recording clips were stored in password-protected files accessible only to the study investigators. The study was undertaken after obtaining clearance from the Institute Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences Nagpur (Reg No-EC/Dept of Comm Med/AIIMS/Nagpur, Dated 21/02/19).
A total of 28 UHND sessions were observed and findings from this evaluation are organised as per the following:
Availability of drug and contraceptives at UHND sessions
Sl No | Name of the drug that need to be supplied | Current availability status | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ORS sachet | Available | Regular supply# |
2 | IFA tablet | Available | Regular supply* |
3 | IFA tablet (small) | Not available | Not supplied |
4 | IFA syrup | Not available | Irregularly supplied |
5 | Anti-malarial syrup/tablet | Not available | Not supplied |
6 | Cotrimoxazole tablet/ syrup | Not available | Not supplied |
7 | Paracetamol tablet | Available | |
8 | Pediatric Paracetamol syrup | Not available | Not supplied |
9 | Albendazole tablet/ syrup | Available | Regular supply |
10 | Zinc tablet | Not available | Supplied, but not brought to the session by ANM; not available in the field. |
11 | Calcium tablet for pregnant women | Not available | Irregular supply |
Contraceptives: | |||
1 | Mala-N | Not available | Not supplied |
2 | Chhaya (Centchromen) | Not available | Supplied to UHTC, but asked by Municipality to return back to store; no supply in this moment |
3 | Antara (Medroxyprogesterone injection) | Not available | Injection given at UHTC; not supplied for field use |
4 | Condom | Not available | Supply available at UHTC; not distributed to ASHA/ANM till date. |
5 | Emergency Contraceptive Pills | Not available | Available at UHTC; not supplied for UHND session |
* Not for distribution among lactating mothers.
#Supply in last six months was considered for assessing regularity.
Distribution of UHND sessions according to the availability of logistics in the session: (n=28)
Sl No | Logistics that need to be available | Number of sites where available (%) | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hand gloves | 28 (100) | Limited number of gloves available |
2 | Red bag for disposal | 28 (100) | |
3 | Black bag for disposal | 28 (100) | |
4 | Absorbent cotton | 28 (100) | |
5 | Cotton bandage | 0 | |
6 | Blank MCP cards | 28 (100) | |
7 | Due list of beneficiaries | 28 (100) | |
8 9 | Adult weighing machine available Adult weighing machine functioning properly and calibrated | 22 (78.6) 19 (67.9) | All the six sessions organised outside AWCs surement don’t facilities have weight/height mea- |
10 | Salter’s scale/digital paediatric weighing machine | 22 (78.6) | |
11 | Salter’s scale/digital paediatric weighing machine in usable condition available | 17 (60.7) | In five sites machine either out of order or not calibrated |
12 | Height measurement scale (any type) | 20 (71.4) | |
13 | Examination table, screen for privacy, stethoscope, digital sphygmomanometer, , foetoscope, thermometer, inch tape, MUAC tape, haemoglobin testing kit, RDK kit, needle/lancet, pregnancy testing (Nischay) kit, urine testing kit (Uristix), test tube, urine collection container, sputum collection container, IMNCI chart booklet | 0 | Digital sphygmomanometer pregnancy testing (Nischay) kit: available in UPHC, but not brought in UHND session site |
Number of beneficiaries attending UHND varied based on location (slum vs. non-slum). Median (IQR) attendance in non-slum UHNDs was seven (4–15) as against 52 (18–65) in slum UHNDs. All sites offered services like registration of pregnant women, immunisation of pregnant women and children under five years of age, and distribution of iron folic acid (IFA) and calcium tablets to pregnant women. Details of key services provided at UHND sessions, as described in Fig. 2 revealed that antenatal services are predominately restricted to pregnancy registration and IFA tablet distribution, whereas among postnatal services only dietary counselling and registration of conditional cash transfer schemes were carried out. Among child health service components, only immunisation and filling of MCP cards were carried out. No reproductive health services were available except interpersonal counselling. Basic investigations such as testing for malaria, urine albumin/ sugar, haemoglobin estimation, screening for diabetes and hypertension, sputum collection and qualitative iodine test kits were not available in any of the UHND sessions. As depicted in the result of the free listing, most of the CHWs opined that the outreach sessions are organised to provide immunisation and registration of pregnant women (salience score of 0.786 and 0.510, respectively). Other components of UHND were grossly ignored by the providers. (Table 3.)
Activities actually performed and that need to be made available at UHND session: free listing as per ASHA’s perspective
Activities performed in a routine UHND session | Activities that should be performed/facilities that need to be available | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sl No | Items | Frequency (%) | Salience | Sl No | Items | Frequency (%) | Salience |
1 | Immunisation for 0-5 yr child | 91.7 | 0.786 | 1 | Supplementary nutrition for children | 33.3 | 0.319 |
2 | Registration of pregnant mother and providing MCP card | 75.0 | 0.510 | 2 | Involving beneficiaries not having permanent address | 33.3 | 0.222 |
3 | Educating mother on newborn and child care, nutrition | 83.3 | 0.351 | 3 | BP measurement | 33.3 | 0.161 |
4 | Antenatal care | 33.3 | 0.300 | 4 | Ensure supply of floor mat | 16.7 | 0.150 |
5 | Inj TT to pregnant women | 41.7 | 0.296 | 5 | Calcium supplementation | 25.0 | 0.144 |
6 | TT injection for 10 and 15 yr child | 33.3 | 0.142 | 6 | Proper sitting arrangement and space | 33.3 | 0.143 |
7 | Educating antenatal women on diet and other issues | 33.3 | 0.135 | 7 | IFA supplementation | 25.0 | 0.141 |
8 | IFA distribution to pregnant women | 16.7 | 0.127 | 8 | Ensure supply of weighing machine | 16.7 | 0.117 |
9 | Advising postnatal women on contraceptives | 25.0 | 0.103 | 9 | Health education/counselling session | 16.7 | 0.117 |
10 | Information on government schemes | 16.7 | 0.093 | 10 | Supplementary nutrition for pregnant mothers | 16.7 | 0.111 |
11 | Searching and vaccinating left-out population | 16.7 | 0.090 | 11 | Ensuring drinking water facility | 16.7 | 0.108 |
12 | Reminder for immunisation | 16.7 | 0.080 | 12 | Weighing of children | 16.7 | 0.107 |
13 | Weighing of pregnant women | 16.7 | 0.074 | 13 | Health camp | 8.3 | 0.083 |
14 | Registration for family planning | 8.3 | 0.073 | 14 | Separate room for check-up of pregnant mothers | 8.3 | 0.083 |
15 | Postnatal care | 8.3 | 0.063 | 15 | Medical check-up by doctor | 8.3 | 0.083 |
16 | Calcium distribution to pregnant women | 8.3 | 0.046 | 16 | Nutritional counselling | 8.3 | 0.083 |
17 | Weighing of children | 16.7 | 0.026 | 17 | Weighing of pregnant women | 16.7 | 0.081 |
18 | Ask ANC mother to bring Adhar card | 8.3 | 0.014 | 18 | paediatric facility | 8.3 | 0.067 |
19 | Giving vitamin A | 8.3 | 0.014 | 19 | Ensure supply of height measurement scale | 8.3 | 0.050 |
20 | Advise on hygiene | 8.3 | 0.012 | 20 | Iron supplementation for children | 8.3 | 0.042 |
21 | Deworming | 8.3 | 0.028 | ||||
22 | Distribution of syrup for children | 8.3 | 0.019 | ||||
23 | Diagnostic/testing facility | 8.3 | 0.017 | ||||
24 | Temperature check | 8.3 | 0.014 | ||||
25 | Antenatal check up | 8.3 | 0.009 |
Thematic analysis of the transcripts revealed the following bottlenecks and barriers faced by the CHWs.
Striking variation in the number of beneficiaries per UHND session has been noted in the slum and non-slum settings. In all five sessions organised in non-slum-predominant areas, poor community involvement and compliance have been noted. One of ANM said, “Most of the people here prefer private practitioners. Even those who go to the government facility, they get all the facilities in the UPHC which is five minutes from here.” The ASHAs seconded this and added, “The number of beneficiaries who are not attending the sessions remain very high during every month. To cover this up, I need to make home visits for counselling and tracking their immunisation status. That increases my workload manifold.”
The geographic boundary of each UHND location was not clear-cut to the service providers. When data collection was done for this study, they did not have a line list of beneficiaries. For ease of work, CHWs divided the population catered to by the said UPHC arbitrarily into some “areas” catering to 1,000 to 1,200 people, roughly based on the number and residence of ASHAs. However, due to constant in-migration, such areas have been expanding, posing great challenges to existing manpower. Often, the CHWs were not being updated regarding slums included or excluded. This resulted in some unserved and left-out pockets as well as some duplication of beneficiaries. When ASHAs were asked about their beneficiary lists, it was observed that in four areas the number of beneficiaries was much less (<50%) than expected (i.e., as calculated based on area population and age distribution) [12]. ANMs also reported that many people come to UHND sessions from adjacent slum areas, outside the catchment area, where no UHNDs are carried out. The ANMs/AWWs had to provide services to these attendees without entering it in the record or portal. Thus a true picture is not being reflected in the records.
As depicted in the free listing (Table 3), most of the CHWs opined that the outreach sessions were organised to provide immunisation and registration of pregnant women (salience score of 0.786 and 0.510, respectively). Other components of UHND were grossly ignored.
Though the basic Module of ASHA [13] was expected to cover the scope for UHND, some ASHAs said, “We did not undergo any formal training on different components of UHND.” Many of them are not aware of all the components of UHND. In free listing their perceptions on the services that need to be available, very few participants listed components like supplementation of iron syrup to children or deworming (salience score of 0.042 and 0.028, respectively). Also, few ASHAs reported that “they felt UHND as a separate program organised on a different date in AWCs.”
A tendency to complete all the sessions before the 15th of every month was observed. On exploration, they replied, “We plan our sessions to complete within the initial two weeks so that we can utilise the remaining days of the month for preparing the reports. Further, if I can finish up my quota, I can take charge of that of one of my colleagues, who might be on leave or deputed for some other work, which happens very commonly.” Except for two sites where the supervisor from the central immunisation team had visited for quality assurance, none of the other sites had regular supervision and monitoring. A medical officer of UPHC commented, “Since some of the days in the first two weeks do have even three sessions on the same day, monitoring or logistic adjustment becomes challenging.”
With the majority being located inside slums, the UHND session sites are plagued with a space crunch. Nine out of the 28 sessions could barely accommodate five or six adults and those sessions conducted in open places had privacy issues. One ANM said, “We cannot carry out any abdominal examination for the pregnant ladies. We conduct sessions even in an open park/courtyard, which does not have privacy or logistics. How will it be possible then? Moreover, during monsoon, it becomes almost impossible to carry out the sessions.”
The supply of supplements (like IFA, calcium and vitamin A) were found to be irregular and inadequate. “The amount of calcium tablets supplied gets over within one to two sessions and most of the beneficiaries don’t get it. … [S]upplies of iron tablets are not adequate. If beneficiaries are already taking iron tablets from private, we have to ask them to continue so,“ commented one ANM. Due to insufficient supply, sometimes CHWs distributed fewer tablets than should be according to norms. Home delivery of iron and calcium tablets by ASHAs to pregnant and lactating women were not carried out.
No MAS member was found to be present in any UHND session. On exploration, the coordinator for the MAS replied, “Development of MAS is in a very primitive stage in most of the slum areas. The liaison between the ASHAs and the MAS members are not in place and we are in process of addressing this issue, sometimes by redistributing the MAS members.” ASHAs and ANMs have no idea about the role of MAS in UHND. Representatives from Urban Local Bodies (ULB) did not interact with CHW in coordinating UHND activities. Lack of community awareness on services provided in UHND and very poor community engagement were observed.
Frequently, ASHAs and ANMs were involved in other survey/ services, which resulted in discontinuation of routine services. Numbers of ASHAs present were much fewer than required per the NUHM norm. Lack of coordination between ASHA, AWW and ANM and internal conflict about job distribution among them was also noted. Currently, contraceptives are expected to be distributed and monitored through Family Planning–Logistics Management Information System (FP-LMISF).14 Training on this online portal was given to only select CHWs. According to one ANM, “ASHAs are unable to use this system as they did not have training and they do not understand its functionality. All don’t have a smartphone to use this application. The IT support team did not provide user-ID for everyone.”
In this study, the current status of the UHNDs’ functioning was evaluated along with the barriers CHWs perceived to implementing services. The supply of logistics and space was inadequate to deliver the package of services. Moreover, lack of clarity on the part of CHWs about their role, technical inefficiency, internal conflict on job distribution and coordination, poor community participation and community ownership were found to be major bottlenecks. As a result, only a few components (immunisation and pregnancy registration) are provided. There are few published studies in India that evaluate UHNDs. Though operational challenges are largely context-specific and noncomparable between different settings, some common issues have been raised during the evaluation of UHND in other settings. Tripathy et al. evaluated UHND sessions in slums in Berhampur, Odisha, and observed poor AWW involvement, inadequate space and logistics and poor supervision hindering its optimum performance [15]. In a process evaluation survey in Vadodara, Gujarat, Mehta et al. observed that identification of high-risk pregnancy, abdominal examination, blood pressure measurement and haemoglobin estimation were not carried out in UHND.16 Kotecha et al. evaluated UHND sessions at Bhavnagar, Gujarat, and found inadequate tracking of drop outs, failure to update growth charts and unsatisfactory performance by ANMs delivering services [17]. Supply of vaccines was adequate (100%) in this study setting, but it was found to be 70% and 94.7% in studies carried out at Uttarakhand and Vadodara, respectively [16,18].
The main strength of this study lies in its qualitative design for an in-depth understanding of the health care provider’s perceptions of barriers. The inclusion of varied occupational groups helped collect deeper insights into the topic. The results should be interpreted with limited external validity, as UHNDs of only one UPHC were studied here, and most of the challenges might be context specific. As providers’ behaviour may change in the presence of an observer, the possibility of a Hawthorne efect cannot be ruled out. Further, including more UPHCs would have given a broader perspective.
Based on the study findings, the following recommendations can be made: Reallocation of the UHND sessions need to be carried out, preferably in unserved and underserved slums, after suitable vulnerability assessment. There is also an imperative need for scaling up the number of AWWs to avoid the sealing effect. In liaison with ULBs, appropriate places have to be identified, with appropriate provision of logistics and privacy measures. Wherever alternate arrangements cannot be made, ANC women have to be referred to the nearest UPHC. They need to be followed up at their residence by ASHA. Planning and demarcation of areas for individual ASHAs needs to be done. The routine annual enumeration exercise of ASHAs needs to be strictly monitored by AWWs and medical oficers to prevent leaving out slum areas or urban pockets. The citizen charter should be displayed at the UHND session site, clearly depicting the package of services offered in UHND session, date of the session, and contact number of ANM and ASHA for consultation. Supply of drugs (contraceptives, supplements, etc.) and logistics should be ensured for the proper functioning of UHND. Buying materials for sitting arrangements and other low-cost essential logistics can be mobilised from the unutilised fund for MAS members. To expand the services of UHND, all concerned stakeholders (ANMs, ASHAs, MAS members, and MOs) need to be oriented to its scopes and package of services. ASHA and MAS members should be suitably trained in screening for NCDs and basic lab investigations such as rapid diagnostic kits for malaria, haemoglobin estimation, iodination of salt and so on. Nearby designated microscopy centres have to be tied up for making arrangements for outreach sputum collection centres at UHND. The session schedule should be revised, which should spread over all the days instead of the initial two weeks. The duration of the sessions should be increased, and the medical oficer should conduct periodic visits to the sessions.
To sum up, current UHND services focus primarily on registration of pregnancy, vaccination of children, and pregnant women, whereas other components are grossly neglected. Integration of Health, ICDS, and Urban Local Bodies is required for convergent planning, monitoring and supervision. The provision of a full range of services is urgently needed to improve the health status of this vulnerable slum population.
The package of services under Urban Health and Nutrition Day (UHND) are partially implemented, focusing primarily on pregnancy registration and vaccination, whereas other essential components—like growth monitoring, contraceptive services—are grossly neglected.
Intersectoral coordination is grossly lacking, and there is poor coordination between community health workers and Urban Local Body and ICDS staff.
Distribution paradox of UHND sessions reflects an urgent need to reallocate the session sites, preferably in unserved and underserved slums, after suitable vulnerability assessments.
The routine annual enumeration exercise of ASHAs needs to be strictly monitored by AWWs and medical officers to prevent left-out slum areas/urban pockets.
None.
Ethics approval (include appropriate approvals or waivers): Ethical clearence was obtained from institute Ethics Committee.
Consent to participate (include appropriate statements): A written informed consent was obtained from each participants before including them in this study.
Consent for publication (include appropriate statements): This study has not been sent anywhere for publication and was not published anywhere. Consent was obtained from all the participants before sending this article for publication in this esteemed journal.
Availability of data and material (data transparency): All the data collected and used in this study for analysis were kept in a secure passward protected system, which if required can be shared with the editorial board.
Code availability (software application or custom code): In this study Microsoft Excel and Visual Anthropac-freelist were used, both being free software available in public domain.