Molecular Epidemiology and Horizontal Transfer Mechanism of optrA -Carrying Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
Artikel-Kategorie: ORIGINAL PAPER
Online veröffentlicht: 13. Sept. 2024
Seitenbereich: 349 - 362
Eingereicht: 01. Apr. 2024
Akzeptiert: 06. Juli 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-031
Schlüsselwörter
© 2024 Peini Yang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Linezolid, the first synthetic oxazolidinone antimicrobial drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in 2000, binds to the V domain of the 23S rRNA component in the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit. As a result, it inhibits the initial assembly of ribosomes and protein synthesis in various Grampositive bacteria, thereby achieving an antimicrobial effect (Egan et al. 2020). Because of its unique mechanism of action and broad antimicrobial spectrum, linezolid is considered a drug of last resort for the treatment of serious infections caused by multidrugresistant Gram-positive bacteria, particularly those caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant
To date, two mechanisms of
Although the vast majority of Gram-positive bacteria are susceptible to linezolid and its resistance remains uncommon, different antimicrobial surveillance studies or programs in recent years have shown an increase in the number of LRE strains (Cui et al. 2016; Deshpande et al. 2018; Mendes et al. 2018). For example, according to the latest data from the German Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance System, the LRE detection rate increased from 0.6% in 2019 to 1.2% in 2021 (Bender et al. 2024). The increase in the LRE detection rate warrants marked attention. Horizontal transfer of the transferable
In this study, 30 strains of
Antibiotics | Abbreviations | Measurement range (μg/ml) |
---|---|---|
1 Linezolid | LZD | 0.5–8 |
2 Ampicillin | AMP | 2–32 |
3 Penicillin | PEN | 0.12–64 |
4 Erythromycin | ERY | 0.25–8 |
5 Clindamycin | CLI | 0.25–8 |
6 Tigecycline | TGC | 0.12–2 |
7 Tetracycline | TET | 1–16 |
8 Gentamicin – high concentration | GEH | S/R |
9 Streptomycin – high concentration | STH | S/R |
10 Ciprofloxacin | CIP | 0.5–8 |
11 Levofloxacin | LVX | 0.12–8 |
12 Moxifloxacin | MFX | 0.25–8 |
13 Vancomycin | VAN | 0.5 |
14 Nitrofurantoin | NIT | 16–512 |
GEH – the high concentrations of gentamicin is 500 μg/ml,
STH – the high concentrations of streptomycin is 1,000 μg/ml
S – susceptible, R – resistant
Additional confirmation of all LREfs was performed by the disk-diffusion susceptibility test. The antibiotics used in the disk-diffusion susceptibility test were chloramphenicol, teicoplanin, and minocycline, all at a concentration of 30 μg. To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of linezolid against

Electrophoresis of polymerase chain reaction products of the
Isolate | Ward | Type of specimen | Isolation time | ST | LZD MIC (ug/ml) | Resistance genes | Virulence genes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 A1 | urology | blood | 2018/10/19 | 16 | 8 | ||
2 A2 | urology | urine | 2018/11/02 | 585 | 8 | ||
3 A3 | urology | urine | 2018/11/18 | 330 | 16 | ||
4 A5 | urology | urine | 2019/01/12 | 974 | 8 | ||
5 A6 | ICU | drainage | 2019/01/17 | 123 | 8 | ||
6 A7 | urology | urine | 2019/03/13 | 16 | 8 | ||
7 A8 | ICU | urine | 2019/03/17 | 16 | 8 | ||
8 A9 | urology | urine | 2019/04/09 | 16 | 8 | ||
9 A10 | urology | urine | 2019/04/22 | 69 | 8 | ||
10 A13 | urology | urine | 2019/07/01 | 16 | 8 | ||
11 A15 | urology | urine | 2019/07/23 | 16 | 8 | ||
12 A20 | general surgery | drainage | 2019/12/20 | 902 | 8 | ||
13 A22 | hepatobiliary surgery | drainage | 2020/07/07 | 535 | 16 | ||
14 A23 | urology | urine | 2020/07/29 | 1287 | 8 | ||
15 A26 | ICU | drainage | 2020/06/05 | 619 | 16 | ||
16 L3 | burn | wound secretion | 2020/11/06 | 480 | 8 | ||
17 L4 | hepatobiliary surgery | pus | 2020/10/21 | 902 | 8 | ||
18 L9 | nephrology | urine | 2020/12/01 | 585 | 8 | ||
19 L13 | urology | urine | 2020/09/27 | 480 | 8 | ||
20 B2 | urology | urine | 2021/08/12 | 16 | 8 | ||
21 B3 | dermatovenereology | wound secretion | 2021/08/30 | 207 | 8 | ||
22 B7 | urology | urine | 2021/10/09 | 632 | 8 | ||
23 B9 | urology | urine | 2021/10/14 | 816 | 16 | ||
24 B10 | ICU | bile | 2021/10/23 | 968 | 8 | ||
25 B11 | burn | wound secretion | 2021/10/23 | 300 | 8 | ||
26 B12 | urology | urine | 2021/11/06 | 179 | 8 | ||
27 B13 | hematology | wound secretion | 2021/11/07 | 16 | 8 | ||
28 B15 | urology | drainage | 2021/12/05 | 660 | 8 | ||
29 B18 | TCM | pus | 2021/08/13 | 631 | 8 | ||
30 B19 | gastroenterology | urine | 2021/12/03 | 585 | 8 |

Phylogenetic tree of 30
The phylogenetic tree of 30
Strain | MIC (μg/ml) | ST | Conjugation frequency | Resistance genes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RA | FFC | LZD | CHL | ERY | CLI | TET | GEH | STH | ||||
128 | 8 | 2 | S | ≤ 0.25 | ≤ 6 | ≤ 0.12 | < 500 (S) | ≤ 1,000 (S) | 8 | – | – | |
2 | 128 | 8 | 6 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 16 (R) | < 500 (S) | ≥ 1,000 (R) | 16 | – | ||
128 | 128 | 8 | 6 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 16 (R) | ≥ 500 (R) | ≥ 1,000 (R) | 8 | 1.2 × 10−4 | ||
2 | 128 | 8 | 6 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 17 (R) | ≥ 500 (R) | < 1,000 (S) | 207 | – | ||
128 | 128 | 8 | 6 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 16 (S) | ≥ 500 (S) | < 1,000 (S) | 8 | 2.0 × 10−4 | ||
0.5 | 128 | 8 | 7 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 16 (R) | ≥ 500 (R) | ≥ 1,000 (R) | 968 | – | ||
128 | 128 | 8 | 6 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 8 (R) | ≥ 16 (R) | ≥ 500 (R) | < 1,000 (S) | 8 | 1.2 × 10−5 |
RA – rifampicin, FFC – florfenicol, CHL – chloramphenicol

Evolutionary tree constructed using SNP comparison files of 30

Genetic background of the
Enterococci are not only naturally resistant to a wide range of antibiotics, including cephalosporins and sulfonamides, but also acquire additional resistance through plasmid and transposon transfer, leading to further spread in the hospital setting, and are thus considered to be a significant challenge in hospital infection control.
Genomic Features | ||
---|---|---|
Genome size (bp) | 3,171,404 | 2,989,374 |
Number of plasmids | 2 | 1 |
Size range of plasmid(s) (bp) | 62,351 (PB2-1) | 105,222 |
GC content of plasmid(s) (%) | 34.89 (PB2-1) | 34.32 |
Coding genes of plasmid(s) | 70 (PB2-1) | 115 |
Location of the |
46108–48021 | 97914–99827 |
According to the drug-sensitivity results, the 39 LREfs all showed multidrug resistance, with high rates of resistance to tetracycline, clindamycin, minocycline, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol (all above 80%), and low rates of resistance to penicillin, ampicillin, furotoxin, vancomycin, tigecycline, and teicoplanin (all below 2.6%), which was in line with the results of a previous study (Deshpande et al. 2018). Typically, the
The virulence genes in
In this study, MLST analysis revealed a high genetic diversity of 30
Since its first discovery, the detection rate of the
The results of the conjugation experiments showed that only three of the 10
WGS analysis revealed that the
This study also has some limitations. First, the number of LREfs included in the study was relatively small given that cases of linezolid-resistance in
In this study, we analyzed the molecular characteristics and transmission mechanism of