Analysis of the Class 1 Integrons, Carbapenemase Genes and Biofilm Formation Genes Occurrence in Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates
Artikel-Kategorie: Original Paper
Online veröffentlicht: 29. Mai 2024
Seitenbereich: 189 - 197
Eingereicht: 09. Dez. 2023
Akzeptiert: 28. März 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-017
Schlüsselwörter
© 2024 Yu Xiu et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Two hundred and sixty-nine non-repetitive clinical
Following the supplier’s instructions, total genomic DNA was isolated using the Ezup Column Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., China). Common carbapenemase genes, including
Primers used in this study.
Primer | Primer sequence (5’–3’) | Target gene | References |
---|---|---|---|
intF | CCAAGCTCTCGGGTAACATC | Wang et al. 2023 | |
P2R | CCCGAGGCATAGACTGTA | ||
5CS | GGCATCCAAGCAGCAAG | variable region | Wang et al. 2023 |
3CS | AAGCAGACTTGACCTGA | ||
AACF | ATCTCATATCGTCGAGTGG | Wang et al. 2023 | |
AACR | TGCGTGTTCGCTCGAATGC | ||
AADAF | GCAGCGCAATGACATTCTTG | Wang et al. 2023 | |
AADAR | ATCCTTCGGCGCGATTTTG | ||
CATF | TTACTCTGGCTACTATCAC | Wang et al. 2023 | |
CATR | TGATGGCATAAGGCTCTAC | ||
KPC-F | CGTCTAGTTCTGCTGTCTTG | Wang et al. 2023 | |
KPC-R | CTTGTCATCCTTGTTAGGCG | ||
VIM-F | GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA | Wang et al.2023 | |
VIM-R | CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG | ||
NDM-F | GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC | Wang et al. 2023 | |
NDM-R | CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC | ||
OXA-23-like-F | CCGTCGTTTACGACATTCA | Wang et al.2023 | |
OXA-23-like-R | AAAGAGCGCATTGCTTTGAT | ||
IMP-F | GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAAYTCTC | Wang et al.2023 | |
IMP-R | GGTTTAAYAAAACAACCACC | ||
bfmS-F | ATATATGCGGGGCTGGTAATTC | Cai et al. 2017 | |
bfmS-R | ATGCAGGTGCTTTTTTATTGGT | ||
cusE-F | ATGCATGTTCTCTGGACTGATGTTGAC | Cai et al. 2017 | |
cusE-R | CGACTTGTACCGTGACCGTATCTTGATAAG | ||
bap-F | CGTTTCCTGGGTCTGATGTATT | Cai et al. 2017 | |
bap-R | GTTATTGAAGGCTTCTTTAGTG | ||
abal-F | GTGGCTCAAGACAGAGAATC | Wang and Ye 2021 | |
abal-R | TCAATCATCATTGGTGGACC | This study |
Primers intF and P2R (Table I) were used in PCR screening for the class 1 integron integrase gene (
Using TaKaRa LA Taq® DNA Polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) and primers intF or 5CS and 3CS (Table I), variable regions of class 1 integrons in
The whole-genome sequencing of the
The whole genome of the isolate was submitted to PubMLST (
SPSS statistical software 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Student’s test and Fisher’s exact tests were carried out for data analysis.
Two hundred and nineteen isolates of CRAB were mainly collected from the ICU (Intensive Care Unit, 72/219), NICU (Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit, 54/219), and EICU (Emergency Intensive Care Unit, 50/219). A total of 176 (80.37%) CRAB isolates were collected from these three wards. While only 44.00% (22/50) of CSAB isolates were from ICU (8/50), EICU (8/50), and NICU (6/50) (Fig. 1). Both CRAB and CSAB were mainly isolated from sputum or throat swabs (CRAB 86.76%, CSAB 88.00%) (Fig. 2).

Clinical ward distribution of CRAB and CSAB isolates.

Clinical specimen type distribution of CRAB and CSAB isolates.
In addition to resistance to the carbapenem antibiotics imipenem and meropenem, 219 isolates of CRAB also had a drug resistance rate of 100% to ticacillin/ clavulanate. The drug resistance rates to ceftazidime (99.54%), ciprofloxacin (99.09%), doxycycline (98.63%), and tobramycin (94.06%) were over 90%. CRAB isolates resistant to tigacycline (5.02%) and colistin (1.37%) also appeared in this study. The resistance rates of 50 CSAB isolates to these commonly used antibiotics were only 10% to 16%, and the resistance rate to minocycline was 4%. All these CSAB isolates were sensitive to tigacycline and colistin (Table II).
Resistance rates of CRAB and CSAB isolates to commonly used antibiotics.
Antibiotics | CRAB (n = 219) | CSAB (n = 50) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Rate (%) | No. | Rate (%) | ||
CAZ | 218 | 99.54 | 6 | 12.00 | 0.000* |
CIP | 217 | 99.09 | 6 | 12.00 | 0.000* |
TOB | 206 | 94.06 | 6 | 12.00 | 0.000* |
DOX | 216 | 98.63 | 6 | 12.00 | 0.000* |
SXT | 166 | 75.80 | 8 | 16.00 | 0.000* |
LVX | 175 | 79.91 | 5 | 10.00 | 0.000* |
AMK | 131 | 59.82 | 6 | 12.00 | 1.000 |
FEP | 169 | 77.17 | 6 | 12.00 | 0.384 |
MNO | 78 | 35.62 | 2 | 4.00 | 0.000* |
TGC | 11 | 5.02 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.226 |
COL | 3 | 1.37 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.000 |
CAZ – ceftazidime, CIP – ciprofloxacin, TOB – tobramycin, DOX – doxycycline, SXT – trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, LVX – levofloxacin, AMK – amikacin, FEP – cefepime, MNO minocycline, TGC – tigecycline, COL – colistin, CRAB – carbapenem-resistant
n – the number of strains in the group
* –
The
Virulence- and resistance-gene-carrying status of CRAB and CSAB.
Genes | CRAB (n = 219) | CSAB (n = 50) | |
---|---|---|---|
204 | 19 | 0* | |
– | 15 | 31 | |
140 | 31 | 0.798 | |
– | 79 | 19 | |
193 | 5 | 0* | |
– | 26 | 45 | |
170 | 24 | 0* | |
– | 49 | 26 | |
218 | 0 | 0* | |
– | 1 | 50 |
CRAB – carbapenem-resistant
n – the number of strains in the group
* –
In CRAB, the drug resistance rate of
Correlations between virulence genes and antibiotic resistance in 219 CRAB isolates.
Antibiotics | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+ (n = 204) | – (n = 15) | + (n = 140) | – (n = 79) | + (n = 170) | – (n = 49) | + (n = 193) | – (n = 26) | |||||
MNO | 72 | 6 | 0.782 | 47 | 31 | 0.4 | 59 | 19 | 0.6 | 68 | 10 | 0.747 |
DOX | 201 | 15 | 1 | 139 | 77 | 0.296 | 168 | 48 | 0.534 | 191 | 25 | 0.317 |
SXT | 154 | 12 | 1 | 98 | 68 | 0.008* | 124 | 42 | 0.066 | 145 | 21 | 0.528 |
CIP | 202 | 15 | 1 | 139 | 78 | 1 | 168 | 49 | 1 | 192 | 25 | 0.224 |
LVX | 163 | 12 | 1 | 109 | 66 | 0.313 | 141 | 34 | 0.037* | 152 | 23 | 0.246 |
TOB | 191 | 15 | 0.607 | 129 | 77 | 0.142 | 161 | 45 | 0.494 | 185 | 21 | 0.011* |
AMK | 125 | 6 | 0.105 | 79 | 52 | 0.173 | 96 | 35 | 0.06 | 119 | 12 | 0.13 |
TGC | 11 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 0.335 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.369 |
CAZ | 203 | 15 | 1 | 139 | 79 | 1 | 169 | 49 | 1 | 192 | 26 | 1 |
FEP | 156 | 13 | 0.74 | 112 | 57 | 0.184 | 141 | 28 | 0* | 148 | 21 | 0.641 |
COL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.534 | 2 | 1 | 0.317 |
CAZ – ceftazidime, CIP – ciprofloxacin, TOB – tobramycin, DOX – doxycycline, SXT – trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, LVX – levofloxacin, AMK – amikacin, FEP – cefepime, MNO minocycline, TGC – tigecycline, COL – colistin, CRAB – carbapenem-resistant
n – the number of strains in the group
* –
There were 75
The resistance rates of the 219 CRAB isolates to commonly used antibiotic agents are shown in Table V. Compared with the
Correlation between class 1 integron and antibiotic resistant rates in 219 CRAB isolates.
Antibiotics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Rate (%) | No. | Rate (%) | ||
CAZ | 75 | 100 | 143 | 99.31 | 1.000 |
CIP | 75 | 100 | 142 | 98.61 | 0.548 |
TOB | 75 | 100 | 132 | 91.67 | 0.009* |
DOX | 74 | 98.67 | 142 | 98.61 | 1.000 |
SXT | 73 | 97.33 | 93 | 64.58 | 0.000* |
LVX | 62 | 82.67 | 113 | 78.47 | 0.462 |
AMK | 58 | 77.33 | 78 | 54.17 | 0.001* |
FEP | 44 | 58.67 | 125 | 86.81 | 0.000* |
MNO | 36 | 48 | 42 | 29.17 | 0.006* |
TGC | 1 | 1.33 | 10 | 6.94 | 0.103 |
COL | 1 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.39 | 1.000 |
CAZ – ceftazidime, CIP – ciprofloxacin, TOB – tobramycin, DOX – doxycycline, SXT – trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, LVX – levofloxacin, AMK – amikacin, FEP – cefepime, MNO minocycline, TGC – tigecycline, COL – colistin CRAB – carbapenem-resistant
n – the number of strains in the group
* –
Correlation between class 1 integron and virulence and resistance genes in 219 CRAB isolates.
Genes | |||
---|---|---|---|
75 | 129 | 0.003* | |
– | 0 | 15 | |
53 | 87 | 0.134 | |
– | 22 | 57 | |
72 | 121 | 0.009* | |
– | 3 | 23 | |
53 | 116 | 0.088 | |
– | 22 | 28 | |
75 | 143 | 1.000 | |
– | 0 | 1 |
CRAB – carbapenem-resistant
n – the number of strains in the group
* –
The isolate AB-134 was reconfirmed by in silico methods using SpeciesFinder v2.0 in CGE. The drug-resistance genes
Results of multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
Oxford | ST | |||||||
3272 | 1 | 12 | 56 | 1 | 1 | 385 | 26 | |
Pasteur | ST | |||||||
2520 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 95 |
CRAB is a significant cause of nosocomial infections that are associated with high mortality rates. It is commonly spread in ICUs (Chukamnerd et al. 2022). This is consistent with the report in this study. CRAB was mostly isolated from intensive care wards, while CSAB was widely distributed in different wards. The reason for this may be that most patients in intensive care wards have primary diseases, severe diseases with many complications, long hospitalization times, long-term indwelling catheters, and have been subjected to invasive operations for examination or treatment. In addition, the long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics increases the chance of infection. Sputum or throat swabs were the primary sources of the isolates, which is consistent with previous reports in our hospital (Xiao et al. 2019). It may be because
The mechanisms of drug resistance in
Bacteria can also spread drug-resistance genes between different isolates through horizontal gene transfer, spreading bacterial resistance. This gene transfer occurs through gene-moving elements such as plasmids or transposons. A large-scale survey in Colombia (Villegas et al. 2007) found that 33.6% of
In this study, whole-genome sequencing analysis of a
One of the most important virulence factors of
Integrons can capture and express resistance gene cassettes through site-specific recombination and play important roles in the production and spread of drug resistance genes (Lee et al. 2017). In this study, we screened for
In this study, the Pc promoters of the variable regions in 78
Because the Pc of class 1 integrons is opposite to the promoter of integrase, there is mutual interference, and studies have shown that the stronger Pc of class 1 integrons can affect the expression of integrase (Lacotte et al. 2017). The SOS stress response system regulates the expression of intI1, and binding the LexA protein to the adjacent sites of the −10 region of the
In summary,